it to a negative number). Get rid of the multiplication in the critical
path, and keep the functions as simple as possible.
This commit was SVN r26864.
Among other things, this patch deals with the following issues:
* fix ompi-checkpoint argument parsing
* ompi-restart -showme prints an extraneous "Restarted child with PID"
message. Move around the debug statement to avoid this.
* fixes for the state machine changes
This commit was SVN r26770.
1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler
1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release
1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah"
1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module
This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk.
== More details ==
Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7.
Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey:
* Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort)
* The Fortran J3 committee
* Tobias Burnus/gfortran
* Tony !Goetz/Absoft
* Terry !Donte/Oracle
* ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-(
There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax.
Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time.
As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory:
{{{
ompi/mpi/fortran/
base/ - glue code
mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77
use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90
use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation
use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation
}}}
There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version.
Other things that were done:
* ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included
* Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added
* The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed:
* libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh
* libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi
* The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example:
{{{
shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ...
}}}
All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches).
I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed.
This commit was SVN r26283.
Roll in the ORTE state machine. Remove last traces of opal_sos. Remove UTK epoch code.
Please see the various emails about the state machine change for details. I'll send something out later with more info on the new arch.
This commit was SVN r26242.
together, so implement all functions in the MTL interface for all
MTLs. The only places NULL was still being set was for add_comm/del_comm,
and matched probe, both of which are straight forward to implement (or
return ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED, since the PML can't emulate matched probe).
This commit was SVN r26194.
the ompi_message_t structure to properly initialize convertor (the peer
is available in the request in OB1, and wasn't needed when I did the
original implementation).
* Implement matched probe for the Portals4 MTL and add NULL function pointers
for the other MTLs.
* Add add_comm and del_comm functions to portals4 MTL so that direct call
almost works again.
* Add NEWS item that we've implemented matched probe
This commit was SVN r26180.
- MAJOR! get src descriptor leaks if mca_bml_base_send fails
- minor. descriptor leaked in mca_pml_send_request_start_copy if the btl returns OMPI_ERR_RESOURCE_BUSY.
This commit was SVN r26077.
Uses new CUDA IPC support. Also, a few minor changes in PML to take
advantage of it.
This code has no effect unless user asks for it explicitly via
configure arguments. Otherwise, it is either #ifdef'ed out or
not compiled.
This commit was SVN r26039.
supposed to. I.e., half-baked/not complete stuff.
This commit backs out all of r25545. Sorry folks!
This commit was SVN r25546.
The following SVN revision numbers were found above:
r25545 --> open-mpi/ompi@7f9ae11faf
to make MPI_IN_PLACE (and other sentinel Fortran constants) work on OS
X, we need to use the following compiler (linker) flag:
-Wl,-commons,use_dylibs
So if we're compiling on OS X, test to see if that flag works with the
compiler. If so, add it to the wrapper FFLAGS and FCFLAGS (note that
per a future update, we'll only have one Fortran compiler anyway).
Fixes trac:1982.
This commit was SVN r25545.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 1982 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/1982
To enable the epochs and the resilient orte code, use the configure flag:
--enable-resilient-orte
This will define both:
ORTE_ENABLE_EPOCH
ORTE_RESIL_ORTE
This commit was SVN r25093.
they only add the context id to the tag selection of the underlying
messaging meachinsm.
We would like to enable an MTL to maintain its own context data
per-communicator. This way an MTL will be able to queue incoming eager
messages and rendezvous requests per-communicator basis.
The MTL will be allowed to override comm->c_pml_comm member,
since it's unused in pml_cm anyway.
This commit was SVN r24858.
Instead of returning MPI_SUCCESS every time they are called regardless of the status of the call, they should return a value representative of the action. So similar to MPI_Wait/MPI_Test they will return MPI_SUCCESS if the action was successfull, or the value that matches status.MPI_ERROR for the operation if it is unsuccessful.
This was discussed on the [http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2011/03/9109.php ompi-devel list]
This commit was SVN r24551.
No need for any CMRs to 1.5... that was already done in CMR 2728.
This commit was SVN r24545.
The following SVN revision numbers were found above:
r22841 --> open-mpi/ompi@b400b84162
Note: the ompi_check_libfca.m4 file had to be modified to avoid it stomping on global CPPFLAGS and the like. The file was also relocated to the ompi/config directory as it pertains solely to an ompi-layer component.
Forgive the mid-day configure change, but I know Shiqing is working the windows issues and don't want to cause him unnecessary redo work.
This commit was SVN r23966.
Setup the event API to support multiple bases in preparation for splitting the OMPI and ORTE events. Holding here pending shared memory resolution.
This commit was SVN r23943.
This is a fairly intrusive change, but outside of the moving of opal/event to opal/mca/event, the only changes involved (a) changing all calls to opal_event functions to reflect the new framework instead, and (b) ensuring that all opal_event_t objects are properly constructed since they are now true opal_objects.
Note: Shiqing has just returned from vacation and has not yet had a chance to complete the Windows integration. Thus, this commit almost certainly breaks Windows support on the trunk. However, I want this to have a chance to soak for as long as possible before I become less available a week from today (going to be at a class for 5 days, and thus will only be sparingly available) so we can find and fix any problems.
Biggest change is moving the libevent code from opal/event to a new opal/mca/event framework. This was done to make it much easier to update libevent in the future. New versions can be inserted as a new component and tested in parallel with the current version until validated, then we can remove the earlier version if we so choose. This is a statically built framework ala installdirs, so only one component will build at a time. There is no selection logic - the sole compiled component simply loads its function pointers into the opal_event struct.
I have gone thru the code base and converted all the libevent calls I could find. However, I cannot compile nor test every environment. It is therefore quite likely that errors remain in the system. Please keep an eye open for two things:
1. compile-time errors: these will be obvious as calls to the old functions (e.g., opal_evtimer_new) must be replaced by the new framework APIs (e.g., opal_event.evtimer_new)
2. run-time errors: these will likely show up as segfaults due to missing constructors on opal_event_t objects. It appears that it became a typical practice for people to "init" an opal_event_t by simply using memset to zero it out. This will no longer work - you must either OBJ_NEW or OBJ_CONSTRUCT an opal_event_t. I tried to catch these cases, but may have missed some. Believe me, you'll know when you hit it.
There is also the issue of the new libevent "no recursion" behavior. As I described on a recent email, we will have to discuss this and figure out what, if anything, we need to do.
This commit was SVN r23925.
as an argument to a macro which could result in it
being called twice. I did not observe any issues,
but it should be fixed. Also did some minor refactoring
for clarity and following code convention.
This commit was SVN r23886.
