* Fix potential race condition with starting a new lock epoch if we
were releasing a lock
* Increment the shared counter if we start a shared lock session during
the unlock code
This commit was SVN r15186.
This is required to tighten up the BTL semantics. Ordering is not guaranteed,
but, if the BTL returns a order tag in a descriptor (other than
MCA_BTL_NO_ORDER) then we may request another descriptor that will obey
ordering w.r.t. to the other descriptor.
This will allow sane behavior for RDMA networks, where local completion of an
RDMA operation on the active side does not imply remote completion on the
passive side. If we send a FIN message after local completion and the FIN is
not ordered w.r.t. the RDMA operation then badness may occur as the passive
side may now try to deregister the memory and the RDMA operation may still be
pending on the passive side.
Note that this has no impact on networks that don't suffer from this
limitation as the ORDER tag can simply always be specified as
MCA_BTL_NO_ORDER.
This commit was SVN r14768.
r14703 for the point-to-point component.
* Associate the list of long message requests to poll with the
component, not the individual modules
* add progress thread that sits on the OMPI request structure
and wakes up at the appropriate time to poll the message
list to move long messages asynchronously.
* Instead of calling opal_progress() all over the place, move
to using the condition variables like the rest of the project.
Has the advantage of moving it slightly further along in the
becoming thread safe thing.
* Fix a problem with the passive side of unlock where it could
go recursive and cause all kinds of problems, especially
when progress threads are used. Instead, have two parts of
passive unlock -- one to start the unlock, and another to
complete the lock and send the ack back. The data moving
code trips the second at the right time.
This commit was SVN r14751.
The following SVN revision numbers were found above:
r14703 --> open-mpi/ompi@2b4b754925
Per discussions with Brian and Ralph, make a slight correction in
where components are installed. Use $pkglibdir, not $libdir/openmpi,
so that when compiled in the orte trunk, components are installed to
the right directory (because the component search patch is checking
$pkglibdir).
This commit was SVN r14345.
The following SVN revisions from the original message are invalid or
inconsistent and therefore were not cross-referenced:
r14289
This merge adds Checkpoint/Restart support to Open MPI. The initial
frameworks and components support a LAM/MPI-like implementation.
This commit follows the risk assessment presented to the Open MPI core
development group on Feb. 22, 2007.
This commit closes trac:158
More details to follow.
This commit was SVN r14051.
The following SVN revisions from the original message are invalid or
inconsistent and therefore were not cross-referenced:
r13912
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 158 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/158
* Make sure that the pval always writes to the correct portion of the
lval. This only matters on 32 bit big endian machines.
* On 32 bit machines when assigning to pval, the other 4 bytes of lval
weren't being written, which could lead to bogus data
We use macros so that there aren't casts all over the code and the pval
assignment can occur to the correct 4 bytes. Refs trac:587
This commit was SVN r12974.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 587 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/587
so this isn't an issue there either. Refs trac:488
This commit was SVN r12675.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 488 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/488
* Fix a counter roll-over issue that could result from a large (but
not excessive) number of outstanding put/get/accumulate calls
during a single synchronization issues (Refs trac:506)
* Fix epoch issue with rdma component that would effect PWSC
synchronization (Refs trac:507)
This commit was SVN r12673.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 506 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/506
Ticket 507 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/507
allocation logic is completely done outside the data-type engine (in the PML) there is
no need for any special case inside the data-type engine. There is less arguments for
the ompi_convertor_pack and ompi_convertor_unpack as well (the last field free_after is
not required anymore as there is no memory allocated in the engine itself). This change
affect all components using datatypes. I test most of them, but it might happens that I
miss some ... If it's the case please let me know (don't shoot the pianist!!).
This commit was SVN r12331.
all platforms. The only exceptions (and I will not deal with them
anytime soon) are on Windows:
- the write functions which require the length to be an int when it's
a size_t on all UNIX variants.
- all iovec manipulation functions where the iov_len is again an int
when it's a size_t on most of the UNIXes.
As these only happens on Windows, so I think we're set for now :)
This commit was SVN r12215.
size and diplacement of data-type. After this patch all data can contain size_t bytes
and the displacements are defined as ptrdiff_t. All of the files I was able to compile
have been modified to match this requirement.
This commit was SVN r12146.
where a window was in both the passive and active side of a lock sequence.
Refs trac:488
This commit was SVN r12112.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 488 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/488
I do something else" rule screws me up again. If we're in a FENCE, but
not in ACCESS | EXPOSE, put us in ACCESS|EXPOSE, as we are now known we
now in a real Fence epoch. Yay silly MPI standards
Refs trac:441
This commit was SVN r11865.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 441 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/441
tell if the remote proc should be in an exposure epoch or not.
Refs trac:325
This commit was SVN r11746.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 325 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/325
epoch's control data could overwrite the previous epoch's data because
we were reusing data structures between PW and SC. Instead, we now
have explicit post_msg and complete_msg counters for completion.
refs trac:354
* Only register the rdma osc callback once, as it turns out that some
btls (MX) do somethng more than update a table during the register
call, and each register call sucks up valuable fragments...
This commit was SVN r11745.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 354 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/354
long ago) supposed to be used as a cache for accessing the PML procs. But in
all of the PMLs the PML proc contain only one field i.e. a pointer to the ompi_proc.
This pointer can be accessed using the c_remote_group easily. Therefore, there is no
meaning of keeping the PML procs around. Slim fast commit ...
This commit was SVN r11730.
* Print a warning error message if a target is not in an exposure epoch
and an update is received. This results in the app continuing with
that call having never happened, rather than evil hangs.
refs trac:325
This commit was SVN r11514.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 325 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/325
can be in both a Post and Start state. Also, the asserts were only
correct assuming that we were never in the post and start state at the
same time, which was obviously silly.
refs trac:303
This commit was SVN r11428.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 303 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/303
implemented entirely on top of the PML. This allows us to have a
one-sided interface even when we are using the CM PML and MTLs for
point-to-point transport (and therefore not using the BML/BTLs)
* Old pt2pt component was renamed "rdma", as it will soon be having
real RDMA support added to it.
Work was done in a temporary branch. Commit is the result of the
merge command:
svn merge -r10862:11099 https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi/tmp/bwb-osc-pt2pt
This commit was SVN r11100.
The following SVN revisions from the original message are invalid or
inconsistent and therefore were not cross-referenced:
r10862
r11099
