ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it.
MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal.
An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object.
Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory.
Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t
The data structure changes are primarily in the following files:
communicator/communicator.h
ompi/info/info.h
ompi/win/win.h
ompi/file/file.h
The following new files were created:
opal/util/info.h
opal/util/info.c
opal/util/info_subscriber.h
opal/util/info_subscriber.c
This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info.
The new model can be seen in the following files:
ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c
ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c
ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c
ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c
ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c
ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c
The current subscribers where changed as follows:
mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c
mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c
mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks")
mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig")
Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com>
Conflicts:
AUTHORS
ompi/communicator/comm.c
ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c
ompi/file/file.c
ompi/file/file.h
ompi/info/info.c
ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h
ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c
ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c
ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h
ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h
ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c
ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c
ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c
ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c
ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c
opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c
opal/util/Makefile.am
This commit adds support for project_framework_component_* parameter
matching. This is the first step in allowing the same framework name
in multiple projects. This change also bumps the MCA component version
to 2.1.0.
All master frameworks have been updated to use the new component
versioning macro. An mca.h has been added to each project to add a
project specific versioning macro of the form
PROJECT_MCA_VERSION_2_1_0.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Hjelm <hjelmn@me.com>
other request-using frameworks.
- Rather than having mpi/c/* functions allocate requests explicitly,
pass the MPI_Request* down to the I/O component and have it
perform the allocation.
- While the I/O base provides a base request which can be used,
it is not required and all request management occurs within
the component.
- Push progress management into the component, rather than having it
happen in the base. Progress functions are now easily registered,
and not all (ie, the one existing) components use progress functions
in any rational way.
ROMIO switched to generalized requests instead of MPIO_Requests many
moons ago, and Open MPI now uses ROMIO's generalized requests, so there
is no reason to wrap those requests (which are OMPI requests) in another
level of request.
Now the file function passes the MPI_Request* to the ROMIO component,
which passes it to the underlying ROMIO function, which calls
MPI_Grequest_start to create an OMPI request, which is what gets set
as the request to the user. Much cleaner.
This patch has two motivations. One, a whole heck of a lot of code
just got removed, and request handling is now much cleaner for I/O
components. Two, by adding support for Argonne's proposed generalized
request extensions, we can allow ROMIO to provide async I/O through
generalized requests, which we couldn't rationally do in the old
setup due to the crazy request completion rules.
This commit was SVN r22235.
* add "register" function to mca_base_component_t
* converted coll:basic and paffinity:linux and paffinity:solaris to
use this function
* we'll convert the rest over time (I'll file a ticket once all
this is committed)
* add 32 bytes of "reserved" space to the end of mca_base_component_t
and mca_base_component_data_2_0_0_t to make future upgrades
[slightly] easier
* new mca_base_component_t size: 196 bytes
* new mca_base_component_data_2_0_0_t size: 36 bytes
* MCA base version bumped to v2.0
* '''We now refuse to load components that are not MCA v2.0.x'''
* all MCA frameworks versions bumped to v2.0
* be a little more explicit about version numbers in the MCA base
* add big comment in mca.h about versioning philosophy
This commit was SVN r19073.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 1392 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/1392
to let the PML (or io, more generally the low level request manager)
to have it's own release function (what was before the req_fini). This
function will only be called from the low level while the req_free will
be called from the upper level (MPI layer) in order to mark the request
as not used by the user anymore.
From the request point of view the requests will be marked as inactive
everytime we read their status (true for persistent as well). As
MPI_REQUEST_NULL is already marked as inactive, the test and wait functions
are simpler. The drawback is that now we have to change in the
ompi_request_{test|wait} the req_status of the request once we get it's
status.
This commit was SVN r9290.
functionality. This is a global registration, so all components have to be made
aware of the registration -- therefore, do things at the component level, not the
module level.
This commit was SVN r8314.
