Use bolded HTML entities for the four arrows, instead of the literal
triangular Unicode "arrows" which many fonts don't include.
This addresses https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57505.
The F13 to F16 function keys are no longer bound by default, and when
there is no nanorc file, there is no way to bind them, so there is no
point in recognizing their escape sequences.
Also, avoid calling a case-changing function when it's not needed.
And elide a default case that can never occur (because the function
always gets called with one of the four letters).
Nano does not do anything for the keystroke anyway (KEY_B2, the center
key on the numeric keypad, gets translated to ERR later on), so there
is no point in recognizing some of its escape sequences -- let those
sequences result in "Unknown sequence" instead.
When --rawsequences is used, consume the full escape sequences for
the F17 to F24 function keys (on xterm-compatible terminals and on
the Linux console), to prevent them entering junk into the buffer.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57483.
When a line in a help text is wider than the terminal, then do not break
that line at COLS - 1, but simply at COLS. In olden times it made some
sense to have an empty column on the right of the introductory text, to
mirror the one on the left. But since the width of the introductions
got limited to 74 columns (four years ago, in commit a9aa0ef9), those
texts have (on a default 80-column terminal) at least six empty columns
on their righthand side. And on narrower terminals, we really don't
want to waste anything and should use all available space.
Also, this whole mechanism of making an exception for end-of-string or
end-of-paragraph and letting only those make use of the final column,
it was a waste of time: it kind-of did the whole break_line() process
again, but then for the entire string (which can be some five hundred
characters long in the introductory texts). So... get rid of it, make
it simple. On an 80-column terminal it doesn't make any difference.
When break_line() is called with its last parameter set to TRUE
(meaning that it will break also at a newline) it will return a
value that is bigger than 1. So it is pointless to ensure that
it is at least 1.
When justifying a paragraph, always first squeeze() is called on
the text (which at that moment consists of a single long line),
which means that (in its wrappable part) this line contains only
single spaces as word separators (and maybe a double space after
a period). So there is no need to call the general is_blank()
function -- checking for a space is enough.
Rationale: nano should not wrap inside the quoting part of a line
because it would change the quoting level, which would misrepresent
things, nor should it wrap inside the indentation part because when
the user tries to indent something beyond the target wrapping width,
she/he does not intend to create a line containing only whitespace,
but effectively wants to push the text beyond the wrapping width.
This copies the behavior of the rewrap_paragraph() routine that is
used during justification, so that automatic hard-wrapping ends up
with the same result as justifying.
Also, always do automatic hard-wrapping when --breaklonglines is in
effect, also when --autoindent is active.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57425.
The bug was old -- it existed since at least version 2.0.6.
This furthermore avoids https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57422.
Reported-by: Sébastien Desreux <seb@h-k.fr>
That bug existed since version 4.4, commit 8fce33af.
That is: allow tabs and spaces to be mixed when comparing indentation.
When the mix of tabs and spaces pushes the text of a line to the same
column as on a consecutive line, then those two lines are considered
to have the same indentation and thus belong to the same paragraph.
This reverts the previous commit (594ef222), and improves upon how
nano has behaved since version 2.9.8.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57404 differently.
That is: two consecutive lines are considered to belong to separate
paragraphs when the smallest indentation of those two lines is not
character-by-character identical with the corresponding piece of
indentation of the other line.
In other words: if one line is indented with spaces, and a consecutive
line is indented by the same distance but with tabs, they are taken to
belong to different paragraphs: a justification will not merge them.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57404.
Bug existed since version 2.9.8, commit 432a7d77.
Go back to how line numbers were colored in versions 2.7.1 to 4.3 --
coloring the space (when a background color is used) was unintented.
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57412.
Bug existed since version 4.4, commit 699cacf7.
For symmetry with the help viewer.
Even though the user could still exit with the bare Q, E, or X keys,
these are not listed in the help text, so they don't really count.
As was noted two months ago: nowhere in the manual does it say that
keywords are case-insensitive, and the manual shows all keywords in
lowercase, and all the examples are in lowercase too. So... simply
expect keywords to be in all lowercase.
