1
1
Jeff Squyres ea2d49e55d Because of r12712, we actually need to allocate one ''more'' item than
the value of __n holds.  This is not a problem in the first case
because sizeof(int) == sizeof(MPI_Flogical), so no alloc is actually
performed (which is most compilers, and why we haven't been bitten by
this yet).  But the second case -- where sizeof(int) !=
sizeof(MPI_Flogical) -- is definitely a problem and needs the "+1" in
the alloc, or Bad Things will happen.

This commit was SVN r12953.

The following SVN revision numbers were found above:
  r12712 --> open-mpi/ompi@3e11c76d4c
2007-01-02 16:16:29 +00:00
..

/*
 * Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Trustees of Indiana University and Indiana
 *                         University Research and Technology
 *                         Corporation.  All rights reserved.
 * Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The University of Tennessee and The University
 *                         of Tennessee Research Foundation.  All rights
 *                         reserved.
 * Copyright (c) 2004-2005 High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart, 
 *                         University of Stuttgart.  All rights reserved.
 * Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Regents of the University of California.
 *                         All rights reserved.
 * $COPYRIGHT$
 * 
 * Additional copyrights may follow
 * 
 * $HEADER$
 */

/**

@page page_mpi The src/mpi directory

@section page_mpi_introduction Introduction

This is the introduction.
This is the introduction.
This is the introduction.
This is the introduction.
This is the introduction.
This is the introduction.
This is the introduction.

*/