1
1
George Bosilca 20f0ec584a A tricky optimization. On my test machine it improve the bandwidth by about 3Mb/s out of 580Mb/s. But
the real interest is for small to middle size unexpected messages. The unexpected messages are copied
by the PML in it's own unexpected buffers. Therefore, there is no reason to make a first copy in the
TCP BTL. The BTL can handle to the PML it's own buffer, and can be sure that once the callback
completed it can reuse the buffer, no matter what happened with the fragment.

This commit was SVN r14320.
2007-04-12 04:52:29 +00:00
..
2007-02-23 00:54:41 +00:00
2007-04-06 19:18:31 +00:00
2007-02-01 19:27:11 +00:00
2007-03-20 11:21:23 +00:00

/*
 * Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Trustees of Indiana University and Indiana
 *                         University Research and Technology
 *                         Corporation.  All rights reserved.
 * Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The University of Tennessee and The University
 *                         of Tennessee Research Foundation.  All rights
 *                         reserved.
 * Copyright (c) 2004-2005 High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart, 
 *                         University of Stuttgart.  All rights reserved.
 * Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Regents of the University of California.
 *                         All rights reserved.
 * $COPYRIGHT$
 * 
 * Additional copyrights may follow
 * 
 * $HEADER$
 */
/** @mainpage

@section mainpage_introduction Introduction

This is the introduction.
This is the introduction.
This is the introduction.
This is the introduction.
This is the introduction.
This is the introduction.
This is the introduction.

@section main_install Installation
 
This is the installation section.
This is the installation section.
This is the installation section.
This is the installation section.
This is the installation section.
This is the installation section.
This is the installation section.

*/