Ralph Castain 780c93ee57 Per the PR and discussion on today's telecon, extend the process name definition as a two-field struct of uint32_t's down to the OPAL layer. This resolves issues created by prior commits that impacted both heterogeneous and SPARC support. This also simplifies the OMPI code base by removing the need for frequent memcpy's when transitioning between the OMPI/ORTE layers and OPAL. ... We recognize that this means other users of OPAL will need to "wrap" the opal_process_name_t if they desire to abstract it in some fashion. This is regrettable, and we are looking at possible alternatives that might mitigate that requirement. Meantime, however, we have to put the needs of the OMPI community first, and are taking this step to restore hetero and SPARC support.		2014-11-11 17:00:42 -08:00
..
base.h	Per the PR and discussion on today's telecon, extend the process name definition as a two-field struct of uint32_t's down to the OPAL layer. This resolves issues created by prior commits that impacted both heterogeneous and SPARC support. This also simplifies the OMPI code base by removing the need for frequent memcpy's when transitioning between the OMPI/ORTE layers and OPAL.	2014-11-11 17:00:42 -08:00
Makefile.am	As per the RFC, bring in the ORTE async progress code and the rewrite of OOB:	2013-08-22 16:37:40 +00:00
rml_base_contact.c	As per the RFC, bring in the ORTE async progress code and the rewrite of OOB:	2013-08-22 16:37:40 +00:00
rml_base_frame.c	[Contribution from Artem - moved it to svn from git for him]	2014-09-15 18:00:46 +00:00
rml_base_msg_handlers.c	[Contribution from Artem - moved it to svn from git for him]	2014-09-15 18:00:46 +00:00
rml_base_receive.c	As per the RFC, bring in the ORTE async progress code and the rewrite of OOB:	2013-08-22 16:37:40 +00:00
rml_contact.h	- Update comment	2009-05-14 00:32:43 +00:00