1
1
openmpi/orte/mca
2014-06-17 17:57:51 +00:00
..
dfs The final step of the RFC: convert the <foo>libdir and friends to fit their respective code areas, and equate them all at the top. Note that we can't entirely separate things as the opal_install_dirs framework can't handle separated locations for the various trees. 2014-05-08 02:01:35 +00:00
errmgr This isn't as big a change as it appears - a change in one place caused a whole bunch of files to require updated #include's due to some arcane linkage. Rework the orte_wait code to reflect the introduction of the state machine. If we are in cleanup mode and just want to kill all our local children, then there is no reason to be polite about it as that introduces *very* long delays at scale. Just kill the procs and move on. 2014-06-17 17:57:51 +00:00
ess This isn't as big a change as it appears - a change in one place caused a whole bunch of files to require updated #include's due to some arcane linkage. Rework the orte_wait code to reflect the introduction of the state machine. If we are in cleanup mode and just want to kill all our local children, then there is no reason to be polite about it as that introduces *very* long delays at scale. Just kill the procs and move on. 2014-06-17 17:57:51 +00:00
filem This isn't as big a change as it appears - a change in one place caused a whole bunch of files to require updated #include's due to some arcane linkage. Rework the orte_wait code to reflect the introduction of the state machine. If we are in cleanup mode and just want to kill all our local children, then there is no reason to be polite about it as that introduces *very* long delays at scale. Just kill the procs and move on. 2014-06-17 17:57:51 +00:00
grpcomm Cleanup a memory leak in the daemons - thanks to Artem for spotting it 2014-06-09 17:14:02 +00:00
iof This isn't as big a change as it appears - a change in one place caused a whole bunch of files to require updated #include's due to some arcane linkage. Rework the orte_wait code to reflect the introduction of the state machine. If we are in cleanup mode and just want to kill all our local children, then there is no reason to be polite about it as that introduces *very* long delays at scale. Just kill the procs and move on. 2014-06-17 17:57:51 +00:00
odls This isn't as big a change as it appears - a change in one place caused a whole bunch of files to require updated #include's due to some arcane linkage. Rework the orte_wait code to reflect the introduction of the state machine. If we are in cleanup mode and just want to kill all our local children, then there is no reason to be polite about it as that introduces *very* long delays at scale. Just kill the procs and move on. 2014-06-17 17:57:51 +00:00
oob The TCP component will have set the hash table entry to NULL, but that doesn't remove the key. So the hash_table retrieval function will return success, but with a NULL pointer - protect against that scenario 2014-06-09 17:46:22 +00:00
plm This isn't as big a change as it appears - a change in one place caused a whole bunch of files to require updated #include's due to some arcane linkage. Rework the orte_wait code to reflect the introduction of the state machine. If we are in cleanup mode and just want to kill all our local children, then there is no reason to be polite about it as that introduces *very* long delays at scale. Just kill the procs and move on. 2014-06-17 17:57:51 +00:00
ras Cleanup compile issues - missing updates to some plm components and the slurm ras component 2014-06-01 17:59:06 +00:00
rmaps Per the ticket, resolve our handling of overload conditions to provide a more consistent response. If we are overloaded (i.e., attempting to bind more processes to a location than the number of cpus under that location), then we consider the following conditions: 2014-06-14 15:38:32 +00:00
rml This isn't as big a change as it appears - a change in one place caused a whole bunch of files to require updated #include's due to some arcane linkage. Rework the orte_wait code to reflect the introduction of the state machine. If we are in cleanup mode and just want to kill all our local children, then there is no reason to be polite about it as that introduces *very* long delays at scale. Just kill the procs and move on. 2014-06-17 17:57:51 +00:00
routed This isn't as big a change as it appears - a change in one place caused a whole bunch of files to require updated #include's due to some arcane linkage. Rework the orte_wait code to reflect the introduction of the state machine. If we are in cleanup mode and just want to kill all our local children, then there is no reason to be polite about it as that introduces *very* long delays at scale. Just kill the procs and move on. 2014-06-17 17:57:51 +00:00
rtc Fix static builds by renaming conflicting type 2014-06-14 17:39:28 +00:00
snapc This isn't as big a change as it appears - a change in one place caused a whole bunch of files to require updated #include's due to some arcane linkage. Rework the orte_wait code to reflect the introduction of the state machine. If we are in cleanup mode and just want to kill all our local children, then there is no reason to be polite about it as that introduces *very* long delays at scale. Just kill the procs and move on. 2014-06-17 17:57:51 +00:00
sstore Use the correct abstraction layer name for the data dirs 2014-05-08 14:32:24 +00:00
state This isn't as big a change as it appears - a change in one place caused a whole bunch of files to require updated #include's due to some arcane linkage. Rework the orte_wait code to reflect the introduction of the state machine. If we are in cleanup mode and just want to kill all our local children, then there is no reason to be polite about it as that introduces *very* long delays at scale. Just kill the procs and move on. 2014-06-17 17:57:51 +00:00