3eb2a3141a
sure ''why'' these changes are necessary -- they don't really have any functional difference. Strange... This commit was SVN r21759.
255 строки
9.2 KiB
Bash
255 строки
9.2 KiB
Bash
dnl -*- shell-script -*-
|
|
dnl
|
|
dnl Copyright (c) 2004-2006 The Trustees of Indiana University and Indiana
|
|
dnl University Research and Technology
|
|
dnl Corporation. All rights reserved.
|
|
dnl Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The University of Tennessee and The University
|
|
dnl of Tennessee Research Foundation. All rights
|
|
dnl reserved.
|
|
dnl Copyright (c) 2004-2005 High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart,
|
|
dnl University of Stuttgart. All rights reserved.
|
|
dnl Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Regents of the University of California.
|
|
dnl All rights reserved.
|
|
dnl Copyright (c) 2007 Los Alamos National Security, LLC. All rights
|
|
dnl reserved.
|
|
dnl Copyright (c) 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
dnl $COPYRIGHT$
|
|
dnl
|
|
dnl Additional copyrights may follow
|
|
dnl
|
|
dnl $HEADER$
|
|
dnl
|
|
dnl OMPI_SETUP_F90
|
|
dnl
|
|
dnl sets:
|
|
dnl F90 : full pathname to compiler
|
|
dnl BASEF90 : compiler name (no path)
|
|
dnl OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS : (actually set by ompi_configure_options, may be
|
|
dnl redefined here)
|
|
dnl FC : Same as F90. Side effect of AC_PROG_FC. Should
|
|
dnl not be used
|
|
dnl defines:
|
|
dnl OMPI_F90 : same as F90
|
|
dnl OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS :
|
|
dnl am_conditional:
|
|
dnl OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS :
|
|
|
|
# See note below about why this macro exists
|
|
AC_DEFUN([OMPI_PROG_FC],[
|
|
AC_PROG_FC([gfortran f95 fort xlf95 ifort ifc efc pgf95 lf95 f90 xlf90 pgf90 epcf90])
|
|
])dnl
|
|
|
|
AC_DEFUN([OMPI_SETUP_F90],[
|
|
AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_GREP])
|
|
|
|
# Modularize this setup so that sub-configure.in scripts can use this
|
|
# same setup code.
|
|
|
|
ompi_show_subtitle "Fortran 90/95 compiler"
|
|
|
|
if test "$OMPI_WANT_F77_BINDINGS" = "0" ; then
|
|
AC_MSG_WARN([*** Fortran 90/95 bindings implicitly disabled (because])
|
|
AC_MSG_WARN([*** Fortran 77 bindings were disabled)])
|
|
|
|
OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS=0
|
|
OMPI_F90="none"
|
|
BASEF90="none"
|
|
OMPI_F90_ABSOLUTE="none"
|
|
if test "$enable_f90" = "yes"; then
|
|
AC_MSG_WARN([*** but --enable-f90 was explicitly specified])
|
|
AC_MSG_ERROR([Cannot continue])
|
|
fi
|
|
elif test "$OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS" = "0" ; then
|
|
AC_MSG_WARN([*** Fortran 90/95 bindings disabled by user])
|
|
OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS=0
|
|
OMPI_F90="none"
|
|
BASEF90="none"
|
|
OMPI_F90_ABSOLUTE="none"
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
# Check for the compiler
|
|
#
|
|
# Note that we don't actually *use* the fortran compiler to build
|
|
# anything in OMPI; it's only used here in configure to find out
|
|
# symbol conventions, type sizes, etc. We also pass it down to
|
|
# the wrapper compiler mpif90.
|
|
#
|
|
# Note that AC_PROG_FC will look for *any* fortran compiler, and
|
|
# we don't want it to find an F77 compiler. The AC docs don't
|
|
# recommend using the "dialect" feature of AC_PROG_FC (and you can
|
|
# only look for one of Fortran 90 or 95 -- not both), so instead
|
|
# use the optional first parameter and steal the list of Fortran
|
|
# compilers (excluding the f77 compiler names) from AC's default
|
|
# list of 95 and 90 compilers and use it here.
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
ompi_fcflags_save="$FCFLAGS"
|
|
# Strangeness in AC2.64 forces us to require a macro that calls
|
|
# PROG_FC instead of calling it directly. Weird.
|
|
AC_REQUIRE([OMPI_PROG_FC])
|
|
FCFLAGS="$ompi_fcflags_save"
|
|
if test -z "$FC"; then
|
|
AC_MSG_WARN([*** Fortran 90/95 bindings disabled (could not find compiler)])
|
|
OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS=0
|
|
OMPI_F90="none"
|
|
BASEF90="none"
|
|
OMPI_F90_ABSOLUTE="none"
|
|
else
|
|
OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS=1
|
|
OMPI_F90="$FC"
|
|
set dummy $OMPI_F90
|
|
OMPI_F90_ARGV0=[$]2
|
|
BASEF90="`basename $OMPI_F90_ARGV0`"
|
|
OMPI_WHICH([$OMPI_F90_ARGV0], [OMPI_F90_ABSOLUTE])
|
|
fi
|
|
fi
|
|
# make sure the compiler actually works, if not cross-compiling
|
|
# Don't just use the AC macro so that we can have a pretty
|
|
# message.
|
|
AS_IF([test $OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS -eq 1],
|
|
[OMPI_CHECK_COMPILER_WORKS([Fortran], [], [], [],
|
|
[AC_MSG_ERROR([Could not run a simple Fortran program. Aborting.])])])
|
|
|
|
# check to see if the F77 and F90 compilers are compatible
|
|
AS_IF([test $OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS -eq 1],
|
|
[AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether $OMPI_F77 and $OMPI_F90 compilers are compatible])
|
|
OMPI_INTL_F90_F77_INTERACTION([fortran_goodness=1], [fortran_goodness=0])
|
|
if test "$fortran_goodness" = "0" ; then
|
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
|
|
AC_MSG_WARN([*** Fortran 77 and Fortran 90 compilers are not link compatible])
|
|
AC_MSG_WARN([*** Disabling MPI Fortran 90/95 bindings])
|
|
OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS=0
|
|
else
|
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
|
|
fi
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
# BWB - FIX ME - remove once everyone updates to LT 2.0.
|
|
#
|
|
AS_IF([test $OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS -eq 1],
|
|
[if test $BASEF77 != $BASEF90; then
|
|
lt_ver=`$GREP '^VERSION' $srcdir/config/ltmain.sh | cut -f2 -d= | cut -f1 -d'.'`
|
|
if test $lt_ver -lt 2 ; then
|
|
AC_MSG_ERROR([You appear to be trying to build the Fortran 90
|
|
layer with Libtool 1.5.x or earlier and a Fortran 77 / Fortran 90 compiler
|
|
combination that will not work with this configuration. You must either
|
|
use a different Fortran 77 / Fortran 90 compiler (one where it is the same
|
|
compiler for both languages), upgrade to Libtool 2.x, or disable the
|
|
Fortran 90 bindings.])
|
|
fi
|
|
fi
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
# OS X before 10.3 (deployment target) does not allow undefined common
|
|
# symbols in shared libraries. Because we can't figure out how to
|
|
# implement MPI_STATUSES_IGNORE and friends wihtout common symbols, on
|
|
# OS X we can't build the F90 bindings as a shared library.
|
|
AC_MSG_CHECKING([for extra arguments to build a shard library])
|
|
case "$host" in
|
|
*apple-darwin*)
|
|
if test -z ${MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET} ; then
|
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([impossible -- -static])
|
|
OMPI_F90_EXTRA_SHARED_LIBRARY_FLAGS="-static"
|
|
else
|
|
case ${MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET} in
|
|
10.[012])
|
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([impossible -- -static])
|
|
OMPI_F90_EXTRA_SHARED_LIBRARY_FLAGS="-static"
|
|
;;
|
|
10.*)
|
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([-Wl,-single_module])
|
|
OMPI_F90_EXTRA_SHARED_LIBRARY_FLAGS="-Wl,-single_module"
|
|
esac
|
|
fi
|
|
;;
|
|
*)
|
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([none needed])
|
|
OMPI_F90_EXTRA_SHARED_LIBRARY_FLAGS=""
|
|
;;
|
|
esac
|
|
AC_SUBST(OMPI_F90_EXTRA_SHARED_LIBRARY_FLAGS)
|
|
|
|
# if we're still good, then save the extra file types. Do this last
|
|
# because it implies tests that should be invoked by the above tests
|
|
# (e.g., running the fortran compiler).
|
|
AS_IF([test $OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS -eq 1],
|
|
[AC_LANG_PUSH(Fortran)
|
|
AC_FC_SRCEXT(f)
|
|
AC_FC_SRCEXT(f90)
|
|
AC_LANG_POP(Fortran)])
|
|
|
|
# Test to see if the F90 compilers likes the C++ exceptions flags. If
|
|
# it doesn't, just abort. We *could* handle this scenario (e.g.,
|
|
# probe the F90 compiler for what flags would be necessary), but we're
|
|
# kinda assuming that no one will care. If they do, they'll e-mail us.
|
|
AC_MSG_CHECKING([to see if F90 compiler likes the C++ exception flags])
|
|
if test "$OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS" = "0"; then
|
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([skipped (no F90 bindings)])
|
|
elif test "$OMPI_CXX_EXCEPTIONS_CXXFLAGS" = ""; then
|
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([skipped (no C++ exceptions flags)])
|
|
else
|
|
FCFLAGS="$FFLAGS $OMPI_CXX_EXCEPTIONS_CXXFLAGS"
|
|
AC_LANG_PUSH(Fortran)
|
|
AC_COMPILE_IFELSE(AC_LANG_PROGRAM([], [[ INTEGER I
|
|
I = 3]]),
|
|
[AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])],
|
|
[AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
|
|
AC_MSG_WARN([C++ exception flags are different between the C and C++ compilers; this configure script cannot currently handle this scenario. Either disable C++ exception support or send mail to the Open MPI users list.])
|
|
AC_MSG_ERROR([*** Cannot continue])])
|
|
AC_LANG_POP
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
# All done -- save values
|
|
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS, $OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS,
|
|
[Whether we want the MPI f90 bindings or not])
|
|
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(OMPI_F90, "$OMPI_F90", [OMPI underlying F90 compiler])
|
|
AM_CONDITIONAL(OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS, test "$OMPI_WANT_F90_BINDINGS" = "1")
|
|
AC_SUBST(OMPI_F90_ABSOLUTE)
|
|
unset fortran_goodness
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
#############################################################################
|
|
|
|
AC_DEFUN([OMPI_INTL_F90_F77_INTERACTION], [
|
|
# make sure that we can combine F90 and F77 code
|
|
AC_LANG_PUSH(Fortran)
|
|
# Fortran module
|
|
cat > conftestf77.f <<EOF
|
|
subroutine Conf1_test()
|
|
end
|
|
EOF
|
|
cat > conftestf90.f <<EOF
|
|
program main
|
|
call Conf1_test()
|
|
end
|
|
EOF
|
|
|
|
# Try the compile
|
|
OMPI_LOG_COMMAND(
|
|
[$OMPI_F90 $FCFLAGS $FCFLAGS_f -c conftestf90.f],
|
|
OMPI_LOG_COMMAND(
|
|
[$OMPI_F77 $FFLAGS -c conftestf77.f],
|
|
OMPI_LOG_COMMAND(
|
|
[$OMPI_F90 $FCFLAGS -o conftest conftestf90.o conftestf77.o $LDFLAGS $LIBS],
|
|
[HAPPY=1],
|
|
[HAPPY=0]),
|
|
[HAPPY=0]),
|
|
[HAPPY=0])
|
|
|
|
if test "$HAPPY" = "1"; then
|
|
$1
|
|
else
|
|
OMPI_LOG_MSG([here is the F77 program:], 1)
|
|
OMPI_LOG_FILE([conftestf77.f])
|
|
OMPI_LOG_MSG([here is the F90 program:], 1)
|
|
OMPI_LOG_FILE([conftestf90.f])
|
|
$2
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
unset HAPPY ompi_conftest_h
|
|
rm -rf conftest*
|
|
|
|
AC_LANG_POP(Fortran)
|
|
])dnl
|