1e2019ce2a
This reverts commit
|
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
.opal_ignore | ||
configure.m4 | ||
Makefile.am | ||
op_example_component.c | ||
op_example_module_bxor.c | ||
op_example_module_max.c | ||
op_example.h | ||
owner.txt | ||
README.txt |
Copyright 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. This is a simple example op component meant to be a template / springboard for people to write their own op components. There are many different ways to write components and modules; this is but one example. Before reading this example, note that it is probably more complicated that many op components need to be. It was done this was intentionally to show many different OMPI concepts. As with most programming examples, there are many different ways to program the same end effect. Feel free to customize / simplify / strip out what you don't need from this example. This example component supports a ficticious set of hardware that provides acceleation for the MPI_MAX and MPI_BXOR MPI_Ops. The ficticious hardware has multiple versions, too: some versions only support single precision floating point types for MAX and single precision integer types for BXOR, whereas later versions support both single and double precision floating point types for MAX and both single and double precision integer types for BXOR. Hence, this example walks through setting up particular MPI_Op function pointers based on: a) hardware availability (e.g., does the node where this MPI process is running have the relevant hardware/resources?) b) MPI_Op (e.g., in this example, only MPI_MAX and MPI_BXOR are supported) c) datatype (e.g., single/double precision floating point for MAX and single/double precision integer for BXOR) Additionally, there are other considerations that should be factored in at run time. Hardware accelerators are great, but they do induce overhead -- for example, some accelerator hardware require registered memory. So even if a particular MPI_Op and datatype are supported, it may not be worthwhile to use the hardware unless the amount of data to be processed is "big enough" (meaning that the cost of the registration and/or copy-in/copy-out is ameliorated) or the memory to be processed is already registered or is otherwise local to the the accelerator hardware. Hence, at run-time, the module may choose to use the accelerator hardware or fail over to a "basic" version of the operation. This failover strategy is well-supported by the op framework; during the query process, a component can "stack" itself similar to how POSIX signal handlers can be stacked. Specifically, op components can cache other implementations of operation functions for use in the case of failover. The MAX and BXOR module implementations show one way of using this method. Here's a listing of the files in the example component and what they do: - configure.m4: Tests that get slurped into OMPI's top-level configure script to determine whether this component will be built or not. - Makefile.am: Automake makefile that builds this component. - op_example_component.c: The main "component" source file. - op_example_module.c: The main "module" source file. - op_example.h: information that is shared between the .c files. - .ompi_ignore: the presence of this file causes OMPI's autogen.pl to skip this component in the configure/build/install process (see below). To use this example as a template for your component (assume your new component is named "foo"): shell$ cd (top_ompi_dir)/ompi/mca/op shell$ cp -r example foo shell$ cd foo Remove the .ompi_ignore file (which makes the component "visible" to all developers) *OR* add an .ompi_unignore file with one username per line (as reported by `whoami`). OMPI's autogen.pl will skip any component with a .ompi_ignore file *unless* there is also an .ompi_unignore file containing your user ID in it. This is a handy mechanism to have a component in the tree but have it not built / used by most other developers: shell$ rm .ompi_ignore *OR* shell$ whoami > .ompi_unignore Now rename any file that contains "example" in the filename to have "foo", instead. For example: shell$ mv op_example_component.c op_foo_component.c #...etc. Now edit all the files and s/example/foo/gi. Specifically, replace all instances of "example" with "foo" in all function names, type names, header #defines, strings, and global variables. Now your component should be fully functional (although entirely renamed as "foo" instead of "example"). You can go to the top-level OMPI directory and run "autogen.pl" (which will find your component and att it to the configure/build process) and then "configure ..." and "make ..." as normal. shell$ cd (top_ompi_dir) shell$ ./autogen.pl # ...lots of output... shell$ ./configure ... # ...lots of output... shell$ make -j 4 all # ...lots of output... shell$ make install # ...lots of output... After you have installed Open MPI, running "ompi_info" should show your "foo" component in the output. shell$ ompi_info | grep op: MCA op: example (MCA v2.0, API v1.0, Component v1.4) MCA op: foo (MCA v2.0, API v1.0, Component v1.4) shell$ If you do not see your foo component, check the above steps, and check the output of autogen.pl, configure, and make to ensure that "foo" was found, configured, and built successfully. Once ompi_info sees your component, start editing the "foo" component files in a meaningful way.