1
1
Граф коммитов

4 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Jeff Squyres
967550b3ac Update the BIND(C, name="foo") test to see if the compiler supports
names longer than 32 characters.

Per discussion on the devel list starting here:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/01/13799.php we
need a new litmus test to disqualify older Fortran compilers (e.g.,
Pathscale 4.0.12) that *seem* to support all the Right Things, but a)
do not support BIND(C, name="super_long_name") or b) run into an
internal error when compiling our mpi_f08 module.

Testing for b) is sketchy at best.  But OMPI has some BIND(C) names
that are >32 characters, and the same compilers that exhibit b) also
seem to not support BIND(C) names that are >32 characters (i.e., a)).
Hence, the following BIND(C) test checks to ensure that BIND(C,
name="foo") works, where "foo" is actually a name >32 characters.

cmr=v1.7.4:reviewer=rhc:subject=Update Fortran configure test to exclude older pathscale/open64 compilers from mpi_f08

This commit was SVN r30421.
2014-01-24 23:17:14 +00:00
Jeff Squyres
23a235d1ef Minor configure output consistency updates
Just some minor updates to make some Fortran test outputs be a bit
more consistent with each other.  This can definitely wait until
1.7.5, unless it causes conflicts with other changes that need to come
into 1.7.4.

cmr=v1.7.5:reviewer=dgoodell

This commit was SVN r30271.
2014-01-13 18:28:26 +00:00
Jeff Squyres
b0ffdb3ae5 As noted by Paul Hargrove, older PGI compilers support ''some'' of
BIND(C), but not ''all'' of it.  So expand our configure checks to
look for multiple different forms of BIND(C):

 * ISO_C_BINDING
 * SUBROUTINE ... BIND(C)
 * TYPE, BIND(C)
 * TYPE(foo), BIND(C, name="bar")

If the compiler supports all of these, then declare that we support
BIND(C), and the rest of the mpi_f08 checks can continue.  If we miss
any one of those, don't bother continuing -- we won't build the
mpi_f08 module.

Also push the results of all of these tests down to ompi_info so that
they can be reported easily (e.g., "Hey, why doesn't my OMPI
installation have the mpi_f08 module?").

cmr=v1.7.4:reviewer=jsquyres:subject=Expand Fortran BIND(C) configure checks

This commit was SVN r30247.
2014-01-10 23:44:55 +00:00
Jeff Squyres
b29b852281 Consolidate all the opal/orte/ompi .m4 files back to the top-level
config/ directory.  We split them apart a while ago in the hopes that
it would simplify things, but it didn't really (e.g., because there
were still some ompi/opal .m4 files in the top-level config/
directory, resulting in developer confusion where any given m4 macro
was defined).

So this commit consolidates them back into the top-level directory for
simplicity.  

There's still (at least) two changes that would be nice to make:

 1. Split any generated .m4 file (e.g., autogen-generated .m4 files)
    into a separate directory somewhere so that a top-level -Iconfig/
    will only get our explicitly defined macros, not the autogen stuff
    (e.g., with libevent2019 needing to get the visibility macro, but
    NOT all the autogen-generated inclusion of component configure.m4
    files).
 1. Change configure to be of the form:
{{{
# ...a small amount of preamble/setup...
OPAL_SETUP
m4_ifdef([project_orte], [ORTE_SETUP])
m4_ifdef([project_ompi], [OMPI_SETUP])
# ...a small amount of finishing stuff...
}}}

I doubt we'll ever get anything as clean as that, but that would be
the goal to shoot for.

This commit was SVN r27704.
2012-12-19 00:00:36 +00:00