Do this rather than the my_list pointer because we need to do some
things that are somewhat special because we pre-pin eager fragments but
not send fragments. Also makes a couple ideas I have slightly easier to
play around with.
This commit was SVN r10127.
- Make the F90 bindings compile and link properly with gfortran 4.0,
4.1, Intel 9.0, PGI 6.1, Sun (don't know version offhand -- the most
current as of this writing, I think), and NAG 5.2, although some
have limitations (e.g., NAG can't seem to handle the medium and
large sizes)
- Building the F90 "small" module size is now the default, even for
developers
- Split up mpif.h into multiple files because parts of it were toxic
to the F90 bindings
- Properly specify unsized/unshaped arrays to make the bindings work
on all known compilers
- Make ompi_info show Fortran 90 bindings size
- XML somewhat lags the generated scripts as of this commit, but
functionality was my main goal -- the XML can be updated later (if
at all).
This commit was SVN r10118.
predefined datatypes) the optimized description was set to NULL instead of
pointing to some valid description. As for some data, having an optimized
version is not possible (as no optimizations bring any benefit), we have
to make sure this field (opt_desc) is always correctly initialized.
This commit was SVN r10112.
Instead of figuring out which free list the fragment belongs to based on size
we simply store a pointer to the list which it belongs in the fragment.
This was reviewed by Brian and should hit all the branches.
This commit was SVN r10072.
Trying to remember what I did here.. eager/max messages should work now, no RDMA yet. A number of other fixes and cleanups.
I do know of two problems:
Bad stuff happens when flooded with send frags too quickly - the BTL doesn't handle flow control.
Certain IBM tests turn up a length assertion in the datatype engine - needs more investigation.
This commit was SVN r10070.
- split mpif.h into mpif.h and mpif-common.h[.in]
- mpif-common.h is included by various f90 things and contains output
from configure
- mpif.h defines some f77-specific stuff and then includes
mpif-common.h
This commit was SVN r9997.
less than we posted for). We were passing by value, so this update was
not being propgated back up the stack and we could segfault. Make the
count argument a pointer so that updates will be passed as expected.
This needs to go to the v1.1 branch
This commit was SVN r9991.
comment in ompi_comm_invalid() in
source:/trunk/ompi/communicator/communicator.h.
Short version:
- ompi_comm_invalid() returns TRUE for MPI_COMM_NULL
- therefore MPI_COMM_C2F needs to explicitly check for MPI_COMM_NULL
(because it uses ompi_comm_invalid())
- make ~20 MPI functions only call ompi_comm_invalid() instead of
calling ompi_comm_invalid() *and* checking for MPI_COMM_NULL (~40 MPI
functions already only called ompi_comm_invalid() -- we should be
consistent)
- similar issue for ompi_win_invalid(), so I added a cross-referencing
comment in win.h and fixed MPI_WIN_SET_NAME to only call
ompi_win_invalid() (and not check for MPI_WIN_NULL)
This commit was SVN r9970.
2. fix for MPI_Free_mem, was calling deregister but never called mpool_free.. so
we leaked memory. Still an open issue here though, if the memory is alloc'd
and the mpool doesn't create and cache a registration, we will never find the
mpool to free with.
This commit was SVN r9944.
derefence through it. It is legal for endpoint_addr to be NULL in the
destructor because if btl_tcp_add_procs() -> btl_tcp_proc_insert()
returns UNREACH, then endpoint_addr will be NULL and we'll OBJ_RELEASE
it.
This commit was SVN r9940.
apparently don't work properly: r9869, r9868 (sm btl alignment issues)
This commit was SVN r9936.
The following SVN revision numbers were found above:
r9868 --> open-mpi/ompi@9b985c3216
r9869 --> open-mpi/ompi@adedf511fb
easier to do event accounting that way
* greatly increase receive event and buffer sizes. We're still about half
of what Cray defaults to, so I don't feel bad about the increases
* Implement a pre-pinning optimization for eager fragments - will be
pinned on first use and left pinned for the life of the fragment
* Since we can't have two receive frag callbacks fired at the same time,
don't have receive free list - just keep one receive fragment in the
module. Saves a big free list and all that interaction.
This commit was SVN r9915.
