* Ensure the profiling version is linked in
* Ensure that PMPI variants are prototyped in mpi.h
* Ensure weak symbols are set correctly
This commit was SVN r26649.
* Add in a bunch of missinc MPI_Op pre-defined constants
* Fix a few parameter types
* Ensure that MPI_Op handles have the same values in all interfaces
(i.e., add them to the mpif-common.pl generator script)
This commit was SVN r26511.
REDUCE_SCATTER, SCATTERV, and GATHERV. Thanks to the mpi4py community
for reporting the issue.
This commit was SVN r26489.
The following SVN revision numbers were found above:
r26488 --> open-mpi/ompi@42793aa10f
Jonathan Dursi), fix a bug in the parameter verification of
MPI_ALLGATHERV: ensure to use the ''remote'' group size when checking
the recvcounts array.
This commit was SVN r26488.
* Remove unused #defines in mpi.h.in
* Add OMPI_PARAM_CHECK in mpi.h.in (so that we can check for it in tests)
* Clean up some comments in mpif-common.h
This commit was SVN r26347.
1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler
1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release
1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah"
1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module
This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk.
== More details ==
Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7.
Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey:
* Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort)
* The Fortran J3 committee
* Tobias Burnus/gfortran
* Tony !Goetz/Absoft
* Terry !Donte/Oracle
* ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-(
There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax.
Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time.
As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory:
{{{
ompi/mpi/fortran/
base/ - glue code
mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77
use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90
use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation
use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation
}}}
There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version.
Other things that were done:
* ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included
* Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added
* The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed:
* libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh
* libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi
* The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example:
{{{
shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ...
}}}
All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches).
I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed.
This commit was SVN r26283.
Roll in the ORTE state machine. Remove last traces of opal_sos. Remove UTK epoch code.
Please see the various emails about the state machine change for details. I'll send something out later with more info on the new arch.
This commit was SVN r26242.
patch from the ticket, released under the BSD license.
This commit was SVN r25949.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 2933 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2933
of the group argument to MPI_COMM_CREATE.
cmr:v1.5:reviewer=jjhursey
cmr:v1.4.5:reviewer=jjhursey
This commit was SVN r25810.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 2967 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2967
supposed to. I.e., half-baked/not complete stuff.
This commit backs out all of r25545. Sorry folks!
This commit was SVN r25546.
The following SVN revision numbers were found above:
r25545 --> open-mpi/ompi@7f9ae11faf
to make MPI_IN_PLACE (and other sentinel Fortran constants) work on OS
X, we need to use the following compiler (linker) flag:
-Wl,-commons,use_dylibs
So if we're compiling on OS X, test to see if that flag works with the
compiler. If so, add it to the wrapper FFLAGS and FCFLAGS (note that
per a future update, we'll only have one Fortran compiler anyway).
Fixes trac:1982.
This commit was SVN r25545.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 1982 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/1982
comment out some unused parameter names. I didn't use
__opal_attribute_unused__ because comm_inln.h is (eventually) included
by <mpi.h>, and therefore we don't have all the OPAL config stuff
available. And it didn't seem worth it to add the optional
attribute_unused stuff to the top of mpi.h.
Thanks to Júlio Hoffimann for reporting the issue.
This commit was SVN r24989.
''other'' direction, so to speak, compared to r24921).
This commit was SVN r24924.
The following SVN revision numbers were found above:
r24921 --> open-mpi/ompi@bd96d028de
No need for any CMRs to 1.5... that was already done in CMR 2728.
This commit was SVN r24545.
The following SVN revision numbers were found above:
r22841 --> open-mpi/ompi@b400b84162
be applied. Correct the MPI validation process of the
MPI_Accumulate arguments.
Fix another potential problem not yet reported. If we convert the
MPI datatypes direclty into OPAL datatypes, we will restrict their
number to the locally different types. Which might not be identical
on the remote node, if we are in a heterogeneous environment. So,
for MPI One sided only deal with MPI level types, never simplify
them on OPAL types (at least on the args). The unfortunate
outcome is that we need to create the args for all datatypes.
This commit was SVN r24466.
have to have an identical ''value'' (it must be the same file handle,
but that means nothing about its actual value). But the datarep must
have an identical value. Additionaly, the etype does not need to be
identical, but the extent of all the etypes supplied must be
identical.
See MPI-2.2 p401-402 for further details.
This commit was SVN r24201.
It's not possible to combine two shared libraries on Windows, so we have to do it a bit different. First generate a small event static library by just linking the object files, and link it into other libraries that needs the libevent API.
This commit was SVN r24039.
This is a fairly intrusive change, but outside of the moving of opal/event to opal/mca/event, the only changes involved (a) changing all calls to opal_event functions to reflect the new framework instead, and (b) ensuring that all opal_event_t objects are properly constructed since they are now true opal_objects.
Note: Shiqing has just returned from vacation and has not yet had a chance to complete the Windows integration. Thus, this commit almost certainly breaks Windows support on the trunk. However, I want this to have a chance to soak for as long as possible before I become less available a week from today (going to be at a class for 5 days, and thus will only be sparingly available) so we can find and fix any problems.
Biggest change is moving the libevent code from opal/event to a new opal/mca/event framework. This was done to make it much easier to update libevent in the future. New versions can be inserted as a new component and tested in parallel with the current version until validated, then we can remove the earlier version if we so choose. This is a statically built framework ala installdirs, so only one component will build at a time. There is no selection logic - the sole compiled component simply loads its function pointers into the opal_event struct.
I have gone thru the code base and converted all the libevent calls I could find. However, I cannot compile nor test every environment. It is therefore quite likely that errors remain in the system. Please keep an eye open for two things:
1. compile-time errors: these will be obvious as calls to the old functions (e.g., opal_evtimer_new) must be replaced by the new framework APIs (e.g., opal_event.evtimer_new)
2. run-time errors: these will likely show up as segfaults due to missing constructors on opal_event_t objects. It appears that it became a typical practice for people to "init" an opal_event_t by simply using memset to zero it out. This will no longer work - you must either OBJ_NEW or OBJ_CONSTRUCT an opal_event_t. I tried to catch these cases, but may have missed some. Believe me, you'll know when you hit it.
There is also the issue of the new libevent "no recursion" behavior. As I described on a recent email, we will have to discuss this and figure out what, if anything, we need to do.
This commit was SVN r23925.
