This commit adds a new configure option: --enable-mpi1-compat. Without
this option we will no longer provide APIs, typedefs, and defines that
were removed from the standard in MPI-3.0. This option will exist for
one major release (Open MPI v4.x.x) and then the option and associated
code will be removed in Open MPI v5.x.x. Open MPI has already
internally prepared for this change. Please prepare your codes
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Hjelm <hjelmn@lanl.gov>
The MPI spec defines that the "mpi" and "mpi_f08" module Fortran
bindings support passing by parameters by name. Hence, we need to use
the MPI-spec-defined parameter names ("dummy variables", in Fortran
parlance) for the "mpi" and "mpi_f08" modules.
Specifically, Fortran allows calls to procedures to be written with
keyword arguments, e.g., "call mpi_sizeof(x=x,size=rsize,ierror=ier)"
An "explicit interface" for the procedure must be in scope for this to
be allowed in a Fortran program unit. Therefore, the explicit
interface blocks we provide in the "mpi" and "mpi_f08" modules must
match the MPI published standard, including the names of the dummy
variables (i.e., parameter names), as that is how Fortran programs may
call them.
Note that we didn't find this issue previously because even though the
MPI spec *allows* for name-based parameter passing, not many people
actually use it. I suspect that we might have some more incorrect
parameter names -- we should probably do a full "mpi" / "mpi_f08"
module parameter name audit someday.
Thanks to Themos Tsikas for reporting the issue and supplying the
initial fix.
Signed-off-by: themos.tsikas@nag.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Jeff Squyres <jsquyres@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles@rist.or.jp>
The various RMA functions need to have the asynchronous property on
all buffers. This property was missing and some buffers were
incorrectly marked as intent(in). This commit fixes the function
signatures.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Hjelm <hjelmn@lanl.gov>
This change makes comparison of `mpi-f08-interfaces.F90` and
`pmpi-f08-interfaces.F90` easier.
Signed-off-by: KAWASHIMA Takahiro <t-kawashima@jp.fujitsu.com>
They were incorrectly changed to subroutines in only `pmpi`
in 258d1aa1607.
Strictly speaking, this change involves binary incompatibility.
But nobody used these subroutines and nobody will be affected because
these subroutines were useless (didn't return a calculated value).
Signed-off-by: KAWASHIMA Takahiro <t-kawashima@jp.fujitsu.com>
in order to solve an egg and the chicken problem, in which mpiext need mpi-f08-types.mod
and/but use-mpi-f08[-desc] needs mpiext, add an extra step
- build fortran 2008 modules only
- build fortran 2008 mpi extensions
- and then build fortran 2008 bindings
Fixesopen-mpi/ompi#3605
Signed-off-by: Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles@rist.or.jp>
* Add a configure time option to rename libmpi(_FOO).*
- `--with-libmpi-name=STRING`
* This commit only impacts the installed libraries.
Internal, temporary libraries have not been renamed to limit the
scope of the patch to only what is needed.
For example:
```shell
shell$ ./configure --with-libmpi-name=wookie
...
shell$ find . -name "libmpi*"
shell$ find . -name "libwookie*"
./lib/libwookie.so.0.0.0
./lib/libwookie.so.0
./lib/libwookie.so
./lib/libwookie.la
./lib/libwookie_mpifh.so.0.0.0
./lib/libwookie_mpifh.so.0
./lib/libwookie_mpifh.so
./lib/libwookie_mpifh.la
./lib/libwookie_usempi.so.0.0.0
./lib/libwookie_usempi.so.0
./lib/libwookie_usempi.so
./lib/libwookie_usempi.la
shell$
```
Fortran uses objects (ompi_f08_mpi_comm_world, mpi_fortran_bottom,, ...) that are defined in C.
Some compilers have different requirements on how these objects should be aligned.
Smaller alignment in C can lead to several confusing warnings from the linker, so try to
find the alignment expected by Fortran compiler, and inform the C compiler.
only define the unique fortran symbol depending on
- CAPS
- PLAIN
- SINGLE_UNDERSCORE
- DOUBLE_UNDERSCORE
and bind the f08 symbol to the uniquely defined C symbol.
Use real data structures to make the code simpler.
(perl script written by Jeff)
@ggouaillardet was right -- we should have put the
ompi_buffer_detach_f08() function in the use-mpi-f08 directory to
begin with. Putting it in the mpif-h directory made it complicated as
to whether the function would be built or not (e.g., whether weak
symbols were supported or not, whether the profiling layer was
disabled or not, ...etc.).
Just put it in the use-mpi-f08 directory and always build it (when the
mpi_f08 module is built, of course), and keep it simple.
Add an mpi_f08-specific implementation for MPI_BUFFER_DETACH.
Per MPI-3.1:3.6, p45, the buffer argument is ignored in
MPI_BUFFER_DETACH for mpif.h and the mpi module. But in the mpi_f08
module, the buffer argument is treated like it is in the C binding.
This commit adds support for MPI_Aint_add and MPI_Aint_diff. These
functions are implemented as macros in C (explicitly allowed by
MPI-3.1). The fortran implementations are a similar mess to the
MPI_Wtime implementations.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Hjelm <hjelmn@lanl.gov>
