Adapt orte_process_info to orte_proc_info, and
change orte_proc_info() to orte_proc_info_init().
- Compiled on linux-x86-64
- Discussed with Ralph
This commit was SVN r20739.
Only proc_info.h-internal include file is opal/dss/dss_types.h
- In one case (orte/util/hnp_contact.c) had to add proc_info.h again.
- Local compilation (Linux/x86_64) w/ -Wimplicit-function-declaration
works fine, no errors.
Again, let's have MTT the last word.
This commit was SVN r20631.
Often, orte/util/show_help.h is included, although no functionality
is required -- instead, most often opal_output.h, or
orte/mca/rml/rml_types.h
Please see orte_show_help_replacement.sh commited next.
- Local compilation (Linux/x86_64) w/ -Wimplicit-function-declaration
actually showed two *missing* #include "orte/util/show_help.h"
in orte/mca/odls/base/odls_base_default_fns.c and
in orte/tools/orte-top/orte-top.c
Manually added these.
Let's have MTT the last word.
This commit was SVN r20557.
The prior ompi_proc_t structure had a uint8_t flag field in it, where only one
bit was used to flag that a proc was "local". In that context, "local" was
constrained to mean "local to this node".
This commit provides a greater degree of granularity on the term "local", to include tests
to see if the proc is on the same socket, PC board, node, switch, CU (computing
unit), and cluster.
Add #define's to designate which bits stand for which local condition. This
was added to the OPAL layer to avoid conflicting with the proposed movement of
the BTLs. To make it easier to use, a set of macros have been defined - e.g.,
OPAL_PROC_ON_LOCAL_SOCKET - that test the specific bit. These can be used in
the code base to clearly indicate which sense of locality is being considered.
All locations in the code base that looked at the current proc_t field have
been changed to use the new macros.
Also modify the orte_ess modules so that each returns a uint8_t (to match the
ompi_proc_t field) that contains a complete description of the locality of this
proc. Obviously, not all environments will be capable of providing such detailed
info. Thus, getting a "false" from a test for "on_local_socket" may simply
indicate a lack of knowledge.
This commit was SVN r20496.
