Fix CID 1327338: Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK):
Confirmed that the c_info array was being leaked. Free the array
before returning.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Hjelm <hjelmn@lanl.gov>
This commit adds the following symbols
MPI_Alloc_mem_cptr_f
MPI_Alloc_mem_cptr_f08
PMPI_Alloc_mem_cptr_f
PMPI_Alloc_mem_cptr_f08
These are implemented in the same way as other `_cptr` routines.
Nowhere in the standard does it say that it is invalid to pass
MPI_BOTTOM to MPI_Get_address yet we were returning an error. This
commit removes the error check on NULL == location.
Fixesopen-mpi/ompi#1355.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Hjelm <hjelmn@lanl.gov>
Without this modification, gfortran throw the following error
if these variables are used for `MPI_DIST_GRAPH_CREATE_ADJACENT` or
`MPI_DIST_GRAPH_CREATE_ADJACENT`.
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic
'mpi_dist_graph_create_adjacent' at (1)
when profiling is built.
This prevents oshmem subroutines from being wrapped twice by third
party tools (e.g. once in oshmem and once in MPI)
see discussion starting at http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/08/17842.php
Thanks to Bert Wesarg for bringing this to our attention
Ensure to define ompi/pompi versions for platforms that don't have
weak symbols. Also make fortran/mpif-h/profile build a separate
sizeof library, just like fortran/mpifh-h does.
Per http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/08/17775.php,
some compilers don't like it when there's a .f90 file that only
contains comments (and no actual Fortran code). So if OMPI determines
that the Fortran compiler does not support enough Fortran mojo to
support MPI_SIZEOF, generate at least one dummy Fortran subroutine
that can be compiled in an otherwise barren Fortran landscape that is
devoid of life and hope.
Fortran uses objects (ompi_f08_mpi_comm_world, mpi_fortran_bottom,, ...) that are defined in C.
Some compilers have different requirements on how these objects should be aligned.
Smaller alignment in C can lead to several confusing warnings from the linker, so try to
find the alignment expected by Fortran compiler, and inform the C compiler.
The libmpi_*.la fortran libraries make some direct calls to
libopen-pal.la. In many (most?) cases, having libmpi_* link
against libmpi is sufficient (because libmpi pulls in libopen-pal).
But when building RPMs on SLES, some compiler/linker flags are used
that seem to make this implicit linking not sufficient -- we get
missing opal symbols when creating libmpi_mpifh.la. So link in
open-pal directly (vs. indirectly), which solves the problem.
