This commit adds support for project_framework_component_* parameter
matching. This is the first step in allowing the same framework name
in multiple projects. This change also bumps the MCA component version
to 2.1.0.
All master frameworks have been updated to use the new component
versioning macro. An mca.h has been added to each project to add a
project specific versioning macro of the form
PROJECT_MCA_VERSION_2_1_0.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Hjelm <hjelmn@me.com>
Noe that this commit removes option:lt_dladvise from the various
"info" tools output. This technically breaks our CLI "ABI" because
we're not deprecating it / replacing it with an alias to some other
"into" tool output.
Although the dl/libltdl component contains an "have_lt_dladvise" MCA
var that contains the same information, the "option:lt_dladvise"
output from the various "info" tools is *not* an MCA var, and
therefore we can't alias it. So it just has to die.
In order to have an effect, ibv_fork_init should be called in the
beginning of the verbs initialization flow - before the calls to the
ibv_create_qp and ibv_create_cq verbs.
These functions are called from the oob/ud code and by the time the
other verbs components (btl openib, pml yalla, ...) call ibv_fork_init,
it's too late. This commit forces the call to ibv_fork_init (if it's
requested) right at the beginning of all the components that are using
verbs.
(ibv_fork_init() can be safely called multiple times)
This commit also removes the btl_openib_want_fork_support mca parameter
and adds a new mca parameter instead - opal_verbs_want_fork_support.
Through this new parameter, fork support may be requested for ALL
components.
The default value for this parameter is set to 1.
Before this commit the btl_openib_want_fork_support parameter didn't
provide fork support for the openib btl if its value was set to 1.
(because when openib called ibv_fork_init, it was already after the
calls to ibv_create_* in oob/ud and thereofre it failed).
Use of the old ompi_free_list_t and ompi_free_list_item_t is
deprecated. These classes will be removed in a future commit.
This commit updates the entire code base to use opal_free_list_t and
opal_free_list_item_t.
Notes:
OMPI_FREE_LIST_*_MT -> opal_free_list_* (uses opal_using_threads ())
Signed-off-by: Nathan Hjelm <hjelmn@lanl.gov>
The previous condition just called assert(), which is a no-op in
non-debug builds. Change it to print a message and then call abort()
to really actually above.
This was CID 1270155.
This commit make spml/yoda compatible with BTL 3.0. This is meant as a
starting point only. More work will be needed to make optimial use of
the new interface.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Hjelm <hjelmn@lanl.gov>
Coverity identified that we treated the possibility that one of the
message buffers could be NULL in some places (because strdup() could
fail), but not in others.
So just use stack buffers that will never be NULL.
This was CID 1269914.
Compiler warning that ret was used before it was assigned. Since this
part of the code is not performance-critical, just throw in an extra
assignment and be done with it.
send reply before posting the receive request again to limit the recursion size to
number of receive requests.
send can call opal_progress which calls this function again. If recv req is started
stack size will be proportional to number of job ranks.
We recognize that this means other users of OPAL will need to "wrap" the opal_process_name_t if they desire to abstract it in some fashion. This is regrettable, and we are looking at possible alternatives that might mitigate that requirement. Meantime, however, we have to put the needs of the OMPI community first, and are taking this step to restore hetero and SPARC support.
These two macros set the prefix for the OPAL and ORTE libraries,
respectively. Specifically, the OPAL library will be named
libPREFIXopen-pal.la and the ORTE library will be named
libPREFIXopen-rte.la.
These macros must be called, even if the prefix argument is empty.
The intent is that Open MPI will call these macros with an empty
prefix, but other projects (such as ORCM) will call these macros with
a non-empty prefix. For example, ORCM libraries can be named
liborcm-open-pal.la and liborcm-open-rte.la.
This scheme is necessary to allow running Open MPI applications under
systems that use their own versions of ORTE and OPAL. For example,
when running MPI applications under ORTE, if the ORTE and OPAL
libraries between OMPI and ORCM are not identical (which, because they
are released at different times, are likely to be different), we need
to ensure that the OMPI applications link against their ORTE and OPAL
libraries, but the ORCM executables link against their ORTE and OPAL
libraries.
