about linkers, have all OPAL, ORTE, and OMPI components '''not'' link
against the OPAL, ORTE, or OMPI libraries.
See ttp://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2007/10/4220.php for
details (or https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/Linkers for a
better-formatted version of the same info).
This commit was SVN r16968.
used at nce (up to one unique collective module per collective function).
Matches r15795:15921 of the tmp/bwb-coll-select branch
This commit was SVN r15924.
The following SVN revisions from the original message are invalid or
inconsistent and therefore were not cross-referenced:
r15795
r15921
that exactly describes the buffer to be used as the target of the
operation
* Use the above flag to disable components setting the flag from being
used for real RDMA operations for the one-sided component (the
BTLs will still be used for RDMA transfers for the PML and for
send/receive communication for the OSC component)
This commit was SVN r15375.
* Fix potential race condition with starting a new lock epoch if we
were releasing a lock
* Increment the shared counter if we start a shared lock session during
the unlock code
This commit was SVN r15186.
a WIN_FREE
* Fix race condition in threaded builds with pending unlocks and
finishing an epoch
* Fix memory leak due to use of OBJ_DESTRUCT instead of OBJ_RELEASE
* Fix race condition between releasing multiple shared locks and
starting a new lock
* Need to incremement the shared count if starting a new shared
lock once an exclusive lock finishes
This commit was SVN r15185.
OBJ_NEW
* Need to single when the passive unlock has left an expose epoch for
the win_free case
* Clean up some debugging output
* fix missing variable initialization
This commit was SVN r15167.
compile failed because of the wrong variable name.
This commit was SVN r14807.
The following SVN revision numbers were found above:
r14806 --> open-mpi/ompi@7e57bbb0ef
This is required to tighten up the BTL semantics. Ordering is not guaranteed,
but, if the BTL returns a order tag in a descriptor (other than
MCA_BTL_NO_ORDER) then we may request another descriptor that will obey
ordering w.r.t. to the other descriptor.
This will allow sane behavior for RDMA networks, where local completion of an
RDMA operation on the active side does not imply remote completion on the
passive side. If we send a FIN message after local completion and the FIN is
not ordered w.r.t. the RDMA operation then badness may occur as the passive
side may now try to deregister the memory and the RDMA operation may still be
pending on the passive side.
Note that this has no impact on networks that don't suffer from this
limitation as the ORDER tag can simply always be specified as
MCA_BTL_NO_ORDER.
This commit was SVN r14768.
r14703 for the point-to-point component.
* Associate the list of long message requests to poll with the
component, not the individual modules
* add progress thread that sits on the OMPI request structure
and wakes up at the appropriate time to poll the message
list to move long messages asynchronously.
* Instead of calling opal_progress() all over the place, move
to using the condition variables like the rest of the project.
Has the advantage of moving it slightly further along in the
becoming thread safe thing.
* Fix a problem with the passive side of unlock where it could
go recursive and cause all kinds of problems, especially
when progress threads are used. Instead, have two parts of
passive unlock -- one to start the unlock, and another to
complete the lock and send the ack back. The data moving
code trips the second at the right time.
This commit was SVN r14751.
The following SVN revision numbers were found above:
r14703 --> open-mpi/ompi@2b4b754925
* Remove unused declaration
* remove unused variable warning when not using progress threads
* If we're using progress threads, we want to lock, not trylock
when in progress, since it was called from the wakeup thread
and not the progress function
This commit was SVN r14739.
to do while(...) { } then we can't change the variables in the ...
atomically, but should do it while holding the module lock.
* Fix dumb communicator creation error when we don't create the progress
stuff (because a window already exists), where we would accidently
jump to the error case.
This commit was SVN r14715.
* Combine polling of the long requests and buffer requests into
one type, and in one place
* Associate the list of requests to poll with the component, not
the individual modules
* add progress thread that sits on the OMPI request structure
and wakes up at the appropriate time to poll the message
list. Not the best, but without some asynch notification
from the PML that a given set of requests has completed, there
isn't much better
* Instead of calling opal_progress() all over the place, move
to using the condition variables like the rest of the project.
Has the advantage of moving it slightly futher along in the
becoming thread safe thing
* Fix a problem with the passive side of unlock where it could
go recursive and cause all kinds of problems, especially
when progress threads are used. Instead, have two parts of
passive unlock -- one to start the unlock, and another to
complete the lock and send the ack back. The data moving
code trips the second at the right time.
This commit was SVN r14703.
Per discussions with Brian and Ralph, make a slight correction in
where components are installed. Use $pkglibdir, not $libdir/openmpi,
so that when compiled in the orte trunk, components are installed to
the right directory (because the component search patch is checking
$pkglibdir).
This commit was SVN r14345.
The following SVN revisions from the original message are invalid or
inconsistent and therefore were not cross-referenced:
r14289
