Ensure that these two flags are in all of mpif.h, the mpi module, and
the mpi_f08 module. Thanks to Rolf Rabenseifner for pointing out the
issue.
cmr=v1.7.4:reviewer=ompi-rm1.7
This commit was SVN r30519.
implementation does (that is not quite adherant to the Fortran
standard). If a compiler allows this behavior, build the mpi_f08
wrapper. For example, ifort allows it, but Pathscale/EKOPath 5.0 is
stricter in its Fortran compliance and disallows it.
This test is temporary; the real fix is to make OMPI adhere to Fortran
properly (i.e., see #4157). Once we fix#4157, this test should be
removed. The main reason for committing this test is to put it into
v1.7.4 so that we can release, but with the intent to remove it by
1.7.5 (or 1.8.x at the latest!).
Refs trac:4157
cmr=v1.7.4:reviewer=ompi-rm1.7:subject=Add mpi_f08-(non)compliance configure test
This commit was SVN r30440.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 4157 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4157
names longer than 32 characters.
Per discussion on the devel list starting here:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/01/13799.php we
need a new litmus test to disqualify older Fortran compilers (e.g.,
Pathscale 4.0.12) that *seem* to support all the Right Things, but a)
do not support BIND(C, name="super_long_name") or b) run into an
internal error when compiling our mpi_f08 module.
Testing for b) is sketchy at best. But OMPI has some BIND(C) names
that are >32 characters, and the same compilers that exhibit b) also
seem to not support BIND(C) names that are >32 characters (i.e., a)).
Hence, the following BIND(C) test checks to ensure that BIND(C,
name="foo") works, where "foo" is actually a name >32 characters.
cmr=v1.7.4:reviewer=rhc:subject=Update Fortran configure test to exclude older pathscale/open64 compilers from mpi_f08
This commit was SVN r30421.
As discovered by the nightly build, r30379 broke the case where
configure does not find a fortran compiler, and no form of
--enable-mpi-fortran was specified.
This commit specifically calls out the difference between a user
specifying that they want Fortran bindings and the default "try to
compile all the Fortran bindings" cases.
cmr=v1.7.4:ticket=4162
This commit was SVN r30386.
The following SVN revision numbers were found above:
r30379 --> open-mpi/ompi@7b28af54bb
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 4162 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4162
So just take out this useless warning.
cmr=v1.7.5:ticket=4163
This commit was SVN r30383.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 4163 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4163
Each Fortran bindings layer builds on the other. Specifically:
* You can build just mpif.h support
* You can build mpif.h and "use mpi" support
* You can build mpif.h and "use mpi" and "use mpi_f08" support
You cannot build mpif.h and "use mpi_f08" support without also
building "use mpi" support.
This new functionality adds new capabilities to the existing
--enable-fortran-mpi switch. You can now pass the following values:
* --enable-fortran-mpi=no or none: synonyms for --disable-fortran-mpi
(i.e., build no Fortran bindings).
* --enable-fortran-mpi=mpifh: build only mpif.h support
* --enable-fortran-mpi=usempi: build mpif.h and "use mpi" support
* --enable-fortran-mpi=usempif08: build mpif.h, "use mpi", and "use
mpi_f08" support
* --enable-fortran-mpi=yes or all: synonyms for --enable-fortran-mpi
(i.e., no argument), which will attempt to build all 3 Fortran
bindings
cmr=v1.7.4:ticket=4162
This commit was SVN r30379.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 4162 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4162
Add a configure test to see if the Fortran compiler supports the
PROTECTED keyword. If it does, use in mpi-f08-types.F90 (via a macro
defined in configure-fortran-output-bottom.h).
This is needed to support the PGI 9 Fortran compiler, which does not
support the PROTECTED keyword.
Note that regardless of whether we want to support the PGI 9 Fortran
compiler + mpi_f08, we need to correctly detect whether PROTECTED
works or not, and then use that determination as a criteria for
building the mpi_f08 module. Previously, mpi-f08-types.F90 used
PROTECTED unconditionally, and we didn't test for it in configure. So
if a compiler (e.g., PGI 9) supported everything else but didn't
support PROTECTED, it would try to compile the mpi_f08 stuff and choke
on the use of PROTECTED.
Refs trac:4093
This commit was SVN r30273.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 4093 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4093
BIND(C), but not ''all'' of it. So expand our configure checks to
look for multiple different forms of BIND(C):
* ISO_C_BINDING
* SUBROUTINE ... BIND(C)
* TYPE, BIND(C)
* TYPE(foo), BIND(C, name="bar")
If the compiler supports all of these, then declare that we support
BIND(C), and the rest of the mpi_f08 checks can continue. If we miss
any one of those, don't bother continuing -- we won't build the
mpi_f08 module.
Also push the results of all of these tests down to ompi_info so that
they can be reported easily (e.g., "Hey, why doesn't my OMPI
installation have the mpi_f08 module?").
cmr=v1.7.4:reviewer=jsquyres:subject=Expand Fortran BIND(C) configure checks
This commit was SVN r30247.
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2013/10/22882.php, fix
the value of MPI_STATUS_SIZE for the -i8 case. Thanks to Jim Parker
for bringing up the issue and providing the patch.
Separate patches are required for v1.6 and v1.7 (and will be attached
to their respective tickets), because this breaks ABI, so we need a
non-default configure option to fix the issue but knowingly break ABI.
cmr=v1.7.4:reviewer=bosilca:subject=Fix MPI_STATUS_SIZE for -i8 case
cmr=v1.6.6:reviewer=bosilca:subject=Fix MPI_STATUS_SIZE for -i8 case
This commit was SVN r29858.
configure test to ensure that the Fortran compiler supports BIND(C)
with LOGICAL parameters (per
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mpi-comments/2013/02/0076.php).
This may become moot shortly -- Pathscale tells me that they intend
upgrade their compiler to support BIND(C) with default LOGICAL in the
very near term (this week?). But we still want this configure test so
that Open MPI won't even try to build the F08 bindings with older
versions of the Pathscale compilers (or any compiler that doesn't
support BIND(C) and LOGICAL parameters).
This commit was SVN r28110.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 3523 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/3523
config/ directory. We split them apart a while ago in the hopes that
it would simplify things, but it didn't really (e.g., because there
were still some ompi/opal .m4 files in the top-level config/
directory, resulting in developer confusion where any given m4 macro
was defined).
So this commit consolidates them back into the top-level directory for
simplicity.
There's still (at least) two changes that would be nice to make:
1. Split any generated .m4 file (e.g., autogen-generated .m4 files)
into a separate directory somewhere so that a top-level -Iconfig/
will only get our explicitly defined macros, not the autogen stuff
(e.g., with libevent2019 needing to get the visibility macro, but
NOT all the autogen-generated inclusion of component configure.m4
files).
1. Change configure to be of the form:
{{{
# ...a small amount of preamble/setup...
OPAL_SETUP
m4_ifdef([project_orte], [ORTE_SETUP])
m4_ifdef([project_ompi], [OMPI_SETUP])
# ...a small amount of finishing stuff...
}}}
I doubt we'll ever get anything as clean as that, but that would be
the goal to shoot for.
This commit was SVN r27704.
