... and add `MPI_COMPLEX4`.
This commit changes values of existing `OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_*` macros.
This change does not affect ABI compatibility of `libmpi.so` and the
like because these values are only used in OMPI internal code.
On the other hand, `ompi_datatype_t::id` values of existing datatypes
are not changed and 73 is newly assigned to for `MPI_COMPLEX4` to
retain ABI compatibility.
Signed-off-by: KAWASHIMA Takahiro <t-kawashima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Though the MPI standard does not have `MPI_CXX_COMPLEX`, `mpi.h`,
`mpif.h`, and `mpi.mod` have it. So I added it for consistency.
Signed-off-by: KAWASHIMA Takahiro <t-kawashima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Following the commit f750c6932c, I compared
`ompi/mpi/fortran/use-mpi-f08/*.F90` and
`ompi/mpi/fortran/use-mpi-f08/profile/p*.F90`, and
`ompi/mpi/fortran/use-mpi-f08/mod/mpi-f08-interfaces.F90` and
`ompi/mpi/fortran/use-mpi-f08/mod/pmpi-f08-interfaces.F90`.
There are many differences. Some are bugs of `MPI_*`, some are
bugs of `PMPI_*`. I'm not sure how these bugs affect applications.
To make it easy to compare these files future, I also removed
editorial differences.
Signed-off-by: KAWASHIMA Takahiro <t-kawashima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Corrected the signatures of the collectives used by the Fortran 2008
interface to state correct intent for inout arguments and use the
ASYNCHRONOUS attribute in non-blocking collective calls.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles@rist.or.jp>
Corrected the signatures of the collectives used by the Fortran 2008
interface to state correct intent for inout arguments and use the
ASYNCHRONOUS attribute in non-blocking collective calls. Also corrected
the C-bindings in Fortran accordingly
Signed-off-by: Philipp Otte <philipp.j.otte@googlemail.com>
We previously needed to have empty targets because AM couldn't handle
having an AM_CONDITIONAL was targets in the "if" statement but not in the
"else". :-(
That now appears as an old automake bug that has been fixed,
so cleanup some Makefile.am
Thanks Jeff for the pointer.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles@rist.or.jp>
The MPI spec defines that the "mpi" and "mpi_f08" module Fortran
bindings support passing by parameters by name. Hence, we need to use
the MPI-spec-defined parameter names ("dummy variables", in Fortran
parlance) for the "mpi" and "mpi_f08" modules.
Specifically, Fortran allows calls to procedures to be written with
keyword arguments, e.g., "call mpi_sizeof(x=x,size=rsize,ierror=ier)"
An "explicit interface" for the procedure must be in scope for this to
be allowed in a Fortran program unit. Therefore, the explicit
interface blocks we provide in the "mpi" and "mpi_f08" modules must
match the MPI published standard, including the names of the dummy
variables (i.e., parameter names), as that is how Fortran programs may
call them.
Note that we didn't find this issue previously because even though the
MPI spec *allows* for name-based parameter passing, not many people
actually use it. I suspect that we might have some more incorrect
parameter names -- we should probably do a full "mpi" / "mpi_f08"
module parameter name audit someday.
Thanks to Themos Tsikas for reporting the issue and supplying the
initial fix.
Signed-off-by: themos.tsikas@nag.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Jeff Squyres <jsquyres@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles@rist.or.jp>
The F08 bindings for MPI_STATUS_SET_CANCELLED incorrectly had the
"flag" dummy parameter set as INTENT(OUT) when it really should be
INTENT(IN).
On the one hand, this is technically an ABI change. On the other
hand, this is an incorrect MPI binding. On the other hand (that's 3
hands for you fans counting at home), this is such a rarely-used API
-- even in the C bindings -- that I'm guessing no one is using this
API, and therefore no one has noticed this error and it isn't worth
porting back to the release branches.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Squyres <jsquyres@cisco.com>
This change makes comparison of `mpi-f08-interfaces.F90` and
`pmpi-f08-interfaces.F90` easier.
Signed-off-by: KAWASHIMA Takahiro <t-kawashima@jp.fujitsu.com>
They were incorrectly changed to subroutines in only `pmpi`
in 258d1aa1607.
Strictly speaking, this change involves binary incompatibility.
But nobody used these subroutines and nobody will be affected because
these subroutines were useless (didn't return a calculated value).
Signed-off-by: KAWASHIMA Takahiro <t-kawashima@jp.fujitsu.com>
in order to solve an egg and the chicken problem, in which mpiext need mpi-f08-types.mod
and/but use-mpi-f08[-desc] needs mpiext, add an extra step
- build fortran 2008 modules only
- build fortran 2008 mpi extensions
- and then build fortran 2008 bindings
Fixesopen-mpi/ompi#3605
Signed-off-by: Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles@rist.or.jp>
