corrected in the MPI 2.0 errata.
* initialized some variables to make our sensitive sun compiler not to
not warn about them when user apps are compiling.
This commit was SVN r13058.
* Added Create_errhandler for MPI::File
* Make errors_throw_exceptions a first-class predefined exception
handler, and make it work for Comm, File, and Win
* Deal with error handlers and attributes for Files, Types, and Wins
like we do with Comms - can't just cast the callbacks from C++
signatures to C signatures. Callbacks will then fire with the
C object, not the C++ object. That's bad.
Refs trac:455
This commit was SVN r12945.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 455 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/455
(all versions up to and including 20060925). The issue has been
reported to Intel, along with a small [non-MPI] test program that
reproduces the problem (the test program and the OMPI C++ bindings
work fine with Intel C++ 9.0 and many other C++ compilers).
In short, a static initializer for a global variable (i.e., its
constructor is fired before main()) that takes as an argument a
reference to a typedef'd type will simply get the wrong value in the
argument. Specifically:
{{{
namespace MPI {
Intracomm COMM_WORLD(MPI_COMM_WORLD);
}
}}}
The constructor for MPI::Intracomm should get the value of
&ompi_mpi_comm_world. It does not; it seems to get a random value.
As mandated by MPI-2, annex B.13.4, for C/C++ interoperability, the
prototype for this constructor is:
{{{
class Intracomm {
public:
Intracomm(const MPI_Comm& data);
};
}}}
Experiments with icpc 9.1/20060925 have shown that removing the
reference from the prototype makes it work (!). After lots of
discussions about this issue with a C++ expert (Doug Gregor from IU),
we decided the following (cut-n-paste from an e-mail):
-----
> So here's my question: given that OMPI's MPI_<CLASS> types are all
> pointers, is there any legal MPI program that adheres to the above
> bindings that would fail to compile or work properly if we simply
> removed the "&" from the second binding, above?
I don't know of any way that a program could detect this change. FWIW,
the C++ committee has agreed that implementation of the C++ standard
library are allowed to decide arbitrarily between const& and by-value.
If they don't care, MPI users won't care.
When you remove the '&', I suggest also removing the "const". It is
redundant, but can trigger some strange name mangling in Sun's C++
compiler.
-----
So with this change:
* we now work again with the Intel 9.1 compiler
* our C++ bindings do not exactly conform to the MPI-2 spec, but
valid/legal MPI C++ apps cannot tell the difference (i.e., the
functionality is the same)
This commit was SVN r12514.
complete, but stable enough that it will have no impact on general development,
so into the trunk it goes. Changes in this commit include:
- Remove the --with option for disabling MPI-2 onesided support. It
complicated code, and has no real reason for existing
- add a framework osc (OneSided Communication) for encapsulating
all the MPI-2 onesided functionality
- Modify the MPI interface functions for the MPI-2 onesided chapter
to properly call the underlying framework and do the required
error checking
- Created an osc component pt2pt, which is layered over the BML/BTL
for communication (although it also uses the PML for long message
transfers). Currently, all support functions, all communication
functions (Put, Get, Accumulate), and the Fence synchronization
function are implemented. The PWSC active synchronization
functions and Lock/Unlock passive synchronization functions are
still not implemented
This commit was SVN r8836.
