This commit fixes a problem reported on the mailing list with
individual writes larger than 512 MB.
The culprit is a floating point division of two large, close values.
Changing the datatypes from float to double (which is what is being
used in the fcoll components) fixes the problem.
See issue #6285 and
https://forum.hdfgroup.org/t/cannot-write-more-than-512-mb-in-1d/5118
Thanks for Axel Huebl and René Widera for reporting the issue.
Signed-off-by: Edgar Gabriel <egabriel@central.uh.edu>
return MPI_ERR_ACCESS if the user tries to read from a file
that was opened using MPI_MODE_WRONLY
return MPI_ERR_READ_ONLY if the user tries to write a file
that was opened using MPI_MODE_RDONLY
Signed-off-by: Edgar Gabriel <egabriel@central.uh.edu>
handle the situation where the user requests a non-zero amount
of data but has a zero-size fileview. My instrinct would have been
to return an error code, but according to the test that I used
it should be MPI_SUCCESS and zero bytes. It is definitely better
than segfaulting :-)
THis makes another test from the IBM testsuite pass.
Signed-off-by: Edgar Gabriel <egabriel@central.uh.edu>
use an allocator to manage temporary buffers when copying
unmanaged data from GPU buffer to host. This is necessary,
since the buffers have to be pinned for better performance,
which is an expensive operation.
Signed-off-by: Edgar Gabriel <egabriel@central.uh.edu>
this commit adds the initial support for cuda buffers in ompio, for blocking
and non-blocking individual read and write operations.
Signed-off-by: Edgar Gabriel <egabriel@central.uh.edu>
since the request code is now being accessed also from the vulcan fcoll
component, the request code was relocated into the common/ompio
directory to avoid ld load problems.
Signed-off-by: Edgar Gabriel <egabriel@central.uh.edu>
This is a bug fix based on a problem reported on the mailing list.
For very large read/write operations, ompio breaks the operation
down into multiple cycles. The problem was that
one of the variables required to maintain its values
across the different cycles did not do that, and because
of that the calculations of the memory offsets was wrong.
Fixes issue #4453
Signed-off-by: Edgar Gabriel <egabriel@central.uh.edu>
