#define CACHE_LINE_SIZE to 128. This name has a conflict on NetBSD,
and it seems kinda odd to have a header file that ''only'' defines a
single value. Also, we'll soon be raising hwloc to be a first-class
item, so having this file around seemed kinda weird.
Therefore, I replaced CACHE_LINE_SIZE with opal_cache_line_size, an
int (in opal/runtime/opal_init.c and opal/runtime/opal.h) on the
rationale that we can fill this in at runtime with hwloc info (trunk
and v1.5/beyond, only). The only place we ''needed'' a compile-time
CACHE_LINE_SIZE was in the BTL SM (for struct padding), so I made a
new BTL_SM_ preprocessor macro with the old CACHE_LINE_SIZE value
(128). That use isn't suitable for run-time hwloc information,
anyway.
This commit was SVN r23349.
the sign of the divident), we have to cast the pointer to an uintptr_t in
order to be able to correctly compute how to align it on the cache line.
Rported and solved by Stephan Kramer. Thanks Stephan.
This commit was SVN r19778.
The same treatement will happens on all sub-projects. The .h files
have to be C++ compatibles and all symbols with an external visibility
have to get the {PROJECT}_DECLSPEC in front of the prototype.
This commit was SVN r11340.
opal_free_list_item_t and everyone was just treating them as
opal_list_itme_t structures, which meant that they were overwriting the
user_data memory anyway. So make an opal_free_lsit_item_t be just a
opal_list_item_t.
Also, opal_free_list_item_t wasn't a proper class, which made it slightly
less than nice to use, so fix that part up. Also update the
opal_free_list_t to use the class macros, so that it is more obvious we
actually do the right thing.
This commit was SVN r10304.
- move files out of toplevel include/ and etc/, moving it into the
sub-projects
- rather than including config headers with <project>/include,
have them as <project>
- require all headers to be included with a project prefix, with
the exception of the config headers ({opal,orte,ompi}_config.h
mpi.h, and mpif.h)
This commit was SVN r8985.
- move mpool and allocator frameworks back to ompi (from opal)
- specialize the ompi_free_list class to use an mpool instance
- un-specialize opal_free_list to *not* use mpool; just use malloc/free
This commit was SVN r6292.
