Following the commit f750c6932c, I compared
`ompi/mpi/fortran/use-mpi-f08/*.F90` and
`ompi/mpi/fortran/use-mpi-f08/profile/p*.F90`, and
`ompi/mpi/fortran/use-mpi-f08/mod/mpi-f08-interfaces.F90` and
`ompi/mpi/fortran/use-mpi-f08/mod/pmpi-f08-interfaces.F90`.
There are many differences. Some are bugs of `MPI_*`, some are
bugs of `PMPI_*`. I'm not sure how these bugs affect applications.
To make it easy to compare these files future, I also removed
editorial differences.
Signed-off-by: KAWASHIMA Takahiro <t-kawashima@jp.fujitsu.com>
(cherry picked from commit cf6d28cb66981cf315f84e5efb8f8256b6c6a3a4)
Corrected the signatures of the collectives used by the Fortran 2008
interface to state correct intent for inout arguments and use the
ASYNCHRONOUS attribute in non-blocking collective calls. Also corrected
the C-bindings in Fortran accordingly
Signed-off-by: Philipp Otte <philipp.j.otte@googlemail.com>
(cherry picked from commit e98d794e8b49ca0f6cfac6b36be2528d7ef7ab67)
The F08 bindings for MPI_STATUS_SET_CANCELLED incorrectly had the
"flag" dummy parameter set as INTENT(OUT) when it really should be
INTENT(IN).
On the one hand, this is technically an ABI change. On the other
hand, this is an incorrect MPI binding. On the other hand (that's 3
hands for you fans counting at home), this is such a rarely-used API
-- even in the C bindings -- that I'm guessing no one is using this
API, and therefore no one has noticed this error and it isn't worth
porting back to the release branches.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Squyres <jsquyres@cisco.com>
This change makes comparison of `mpi-f08-interfaces.F90` and
`pmpi-f08-interfaces.F90` easier.
Signed-off-by: KAWASHIMA Takahiro <t-kawashima@jp.fujitsu.com>
in order to solve an egg and the chicken problem, in which mpiext need mpi-f08-types.mod
and/but use-mpi-f08[-desc] needs mpiext, add an extra step
- build fortran 2008 modules only
- build fortran 2008 mpi extensions
- and then build fortran 2008 bindings
Fixesopen-mpi/ompi#3605
Signed-off-by: Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles@rist.or.jp>
