- Add a lengthy comment explaining why we don't get F90 data type
alignments
- Remove config/f90_check.m4 and its entry in acinclude.m4
This commit was SVN r9707.
The following SVN revision numbers were found above:
r9698 --> open-mpi/ompi@e57300da4c
only uses the F77 alignments anyway. Plus, it is currently unknown
how to reliably get the F90 alignments because compilers *may* reorder
things and/or give different alignments than the f77 tests.
This commit was SVN r9698.
- Make the F90 checks use the identical types to the F77 checks (e.g.,
INTEGER*4, as opposed to potential selected_int_kind() equivalents)
- Comment out the F77 and F90 alignment check failure -- there is some
confusion here; some vendors apparently told Craig R. yesterday that
they change the alignments of types based on whether the instance is
a standalone variable, in an array, or a member of a struct.
More investigation is needed (and potentially clarification for MPI
users -- this could be quite problematic!), but this alignment test is
otherwise hosing the nightlies, so it needs to be taken out for the
moment.
This commit was SVN r9031.
changes. The two Big Changes are elegance (much more re-use of code
rather than cut-n-pasting the same code over and over and over and...)
and enabling cross-compilation for F77 and F90 (because we actually
have to *run* some compiled F77 and F90 programs for some of the
tests, which obviously won't work in a cross-compilation environment
-- so enable the use of config.cache to load such values in
cross-compiling environments).
This commit was SVN r8991.
