allow for toggling of both control/data progress models.
allow for using FI_AV_TABLE or FI_AV_MAP for av type.
Signed-off-by: Howard Pritchard <howardp@lanl.gov>
As more providers get added to libfabric, the default exclude list would need
to be updated.
Instead, we choose to include only the providers known to work by default.
New default:
- include: psm,psm2,gni
- exclude: none
This commit changes the priority of mtl components to be relative to
pml/ob1 and updates the mtl interface to expose this priority. cm now
sets its own priority based on the priority of the selected mtl
component.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Hjelm <hjelmn@lanl.gov>
Bring Slurm PMI-1 component online
Bring the s2 component online
Little cleanup - let the various PMIx modules set the process name during init, and then just raise it up to the ORTE level. Required as the different PMI environments all pass the jobid in different ways.
Bring the OMPI pubsub/pmi component online
Get comm_spawn working again
Ensure we always provide a cpuset, even if it is NULL
pmix/cray: adjust cray pmix component for pmix
Make changes so cray pmix can work within the integrated
ompi/pmix framework.
Bring singletons back online. Implement the comm_spawn operation using pmix - not tested yet
Cleanup comm_spawn - procs now starting, error in connect_accept
Complete integration
mtl_ofi_provider_include (resp. mtl_ofi_provider_exclude) can be used
to specify which provider(s) the OFI MTL can select (resp. ignore).
e.g. --mca mtl_ofi_provider_include "psm,sockets"
By default, mtl_ofi_provider_exclude is set to "sockets,mxm".
This deprecates the old MCA var named "mtl_ofi_provider".
Some OFI providers such as "sockets" are used for debugging
purposes mostly. For these providers, other components usually
offer better performance -- e.g. for sockets, the BTL/TCP would
be a better choice.
Thus, we chose to ignore some providers unless explicitly asked
by the user on the command line:
e.g. --mca mtl_ofi_provider sockets
Retain inline progress function for ofi
mtl, but have a non-inlined progress function
which is registered with the opal progress
mechanism.
@jithinjosepkl
I've bad news about the psm provider. I still notice
segfaults - not always - but frequently at finalize
when using the psm provider. I don't notice this
when using the sockets provider.
Signed-off-by: Howard Pritchard <howardp@lanl.gov>
