1
1

4 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Brian Barrett
c42da09796 * Fix a small bug George noticed - if you change the prefix (or any of the
installation directories) in configure, the files that depend on this
  information are not properly rebuilt.  If you need this information,
  don't setup a -D in the Makefile.am - instead, include 
  opal/install_dirs.h.
* Use the : option in AC_CONFIG_FILES to avoid needing to expose that
  we are playing around with temporary files with our headers to avoid
  rebuilding
* Clean up the version file information a bit, and like the install 
  directory stuff, make sure that there is a dependency so that 
  ompi_info gets rebuilt properly when a version number changes.

This commit was SVN r9256.
2006-03-12 04:35:01 +00:00
Brian Barrett
e830339098 * turns out nodist_ and dist_ mean different things... We actually want to
include help-opal-wrapper.txt in the dist tarball directly.  We don't want
  to include the wrapper-data.txt files, because we actually want to ship the
  .in versions of those files, and AM automatically ships aything needed for
  configure's output

This commit was SVN r8711.
2006-01-17 15:23:46 +00:00
Brian Barrett
187f1b21bb remove reference to file that doesn't exist
This commit was SVN r8703.
2006-01-16 14:00:52 +00:00
Brian Barrett
c96f870674 * Merge of wrapper compiler updates from the bwb-wrapper-fix branch (r8690 -
r8698), with changes below:

  - Split wrapper flags into those required for each of the three projects,
    and cleaned up some cruft (including the LIBMPI_EXTRA_*FLAGS) through-
    out the build system
  - Added opal_init_util and opal_finalize_util to allow init / cleanup
    of all the opal code that doesn't require the MCA system
  - Create standalone key=value file parser, based on the one that used
    to be in the mca param parser, so that it can be shared in multiple
    places
  - Add wrapper datafiles for opal, orte, and ompi wrappers, and add
    wrapper compiler with support for all the old features

This commit was SVN r8699.

The following SVN revisions from the original message are invalid or
inconsistent and therefore were not cross-referenced:
  r8690
  r8698
2006-01-16 01:48:03 +00:00