The UD BTL isn't gone - the latest version is in my afriedle-ud branch. This version on the trunk was very old, ompi_ignore'd, lacked performance, and probably contained bugs. The maintained version on my branch is working solid, and will eventually come back, but not for v1.2.
This commit was SVN r12144.
where a window was in both the passive and active side of a lock sequence.
Refs trac:488
This commit was SVN r12112.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 488 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/488
constrained:
* Make sure we always have a number of eager fragments available
that scales with the number of processes communicating with
a given proc over shared memory
* Use FREE_LIST_GET instead of FREE_LIST_WAIT to return an
error to the PML when resource exhaustion occurs
* Don't dereference the frag during alloc unless we're sure
it's not NULL
Reviewed by: Galen
Refs trac:413
This commit was SVN r12053.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 413 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/413
First, move the OPAL_THREAD_LOCK out to the same level as its corresponding UNLOCK. It was possible to hit the UNLOCK without ever acquiring the lock.
Since the OPAL_THREAD_ADD64() is now protected by this lock, we can just do the decrement non-atomically.
This commit was SVN r11958.
Don't try to acquire ompi_request_lock here, which in all cases is already held. Avoids deadlock that occurs even when threads are enabled and we're running a THREAD_SINGLE app.
Reviewed by Galen.
This commit was SVN r11957.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 183 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/183
I do something else" rule screws me up again. If we're in a FENCE, but
not in ACCESS | EXPOSE, put us in ACCESS|EXPOSE, as we are now known we
now in a real Fence epoch. Yay silly MPI standards
Refs trac:441
This commit was SVN r11865.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 441 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/441
on the number of known local procs, with a high and low watermark. Right
now, we default to a low watermark point of 64MB, a per-proc scaling
factor of 32MB, and a high watermark point of 512MB
Refs trac:212
This commit was SVN r11824.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 212 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/212
GIDs (there can be more than one) and not GIDs of the HCA on the network. Entry
zero always have to be initialized so we use it, and warn user if there is more
then one port active and default subnet is configured on at least one of them.
This commit was SVN r11815.
the component is configured successfully. Otherwise, we can end up
trying to run make in the romio directory without any Makefiles. This
really only happens on the targets that recurse into DIST_SUBDIRS - ie
dist, maintainer-clean, and distclean
refs trac:411
This commit was SVN r11807.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 411 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/411
tell if the remote proc should be in an exposure epoch or not.
Refs trac:325
This commit was SVN r11746.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 325 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/325
epoch's control data could overwrite the previous epoch's data because
we were reusing data structures between PW and SC. Instead, we now
have explicit post_msg and complete_msg counters for completion.
refs trac:354
* Only register the rdma osc callback once, as it turns out that some
btls (MX) do somethng more than update a table during the register
call, and each register call sucks up valuable fragments...
This commit was SVN r11745.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 354 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/354
long ago) supposed to be used as a cache for accessing the PML procs. But in
all of the PMLs the PML proc contain only one field i.e. a pointer to the ompi_proc.
This pointer can be accessed using the c_remote_group easily. Therefore, there is no
meaning of keeping the PML procs around. Slim fast commit ...
This commit was SVN r11730.
if we want to be able to reuse the request. If not, the request will never be freed
even if the user call MPI_Request_free.
This commit was SVN r11717.
