1
1
Граф коммитов

5 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
George Bosilca
e479951b3b And now the correct version of the timers. In fact, MPI_Wtime is supposed
to return the value on seconds not some other unit based on the resolution
of MPI_Wtick. Which I think it's the wrong solution, as instead of forcing
the user to do additional computations in order to convert when he needs
the result in seconds, force us to convert every time. Unfortunately,
converting requires a division with a double which is a costly
operation. But, MPI is a standard and we have to follow it ...

This commit was SVN r11481.
2006-08-29 04:30:33 +00:00
Gleb Natapov
40ca1dd2d4 ran dos2unix on it
This commit was SVN r11463.
2006-08-28 10:27:27 +00:00
George Bosilca
ee75c45ec5 Use the OPAL timers toi report timers as accurately as possible.
This commit was SVN r11442.
2006-08-27 04:58:02 +00:00
Brian Barrett
566a050c23 Next step in the project split, mainly source code re-arranging
- move files out of toplevel include/ and etc/, moving it into the
    sub-projects
  - rather than including config headers with <project>/include, 
    have them as <project>
  - require all headers to be included with a project prefix, with
    the exception of the config headers ({opal,orte,ompi}_config.h
    mpi.h, and mpif.h)

This commit was SVN r8985.
2006-02-12 01:33:29 +00:00
Brian Barrett
28891d6de3 * Move MPI_Wtime and MPI_Wtick back out of mpi.h and into the C bindings library,
restoring the PMPI version.  A variety of reasons for this:

  - mpi.h was blinding using inline in a C header without the configrue mojo
    properly set it, as mpi.h doesn't include ompi_config.h.  This eventually
    would have caused a borked build.
  - mpi.h and mpif.h were never updated to not include PMPI_W{tick,time} as
    a proper prototype
  - The C++ and F90 bindings didn't do the right things when there was no
    PMPI version of the C call, but profiling was enabled
  - Since we only use gettimeofday, the function call overhead really doesn't
    matter

This should probably go to the 1.0 branch

This commit was SVN r8014.
2005-11-07 17:22:48 +00:00