1
1

6 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Jeff Squyres
3cfa8f55c4 Gaah; I meant to include a better comment in the last commit but had
forgotten to save before the commit was sent.

This comment explains why we're doing a cache check here rather than a
real check.

This commit was SVN r20975.
2009-04-10 21:16:23 +00:00
Jeff Squyres
9fcd01035d Fix a problem reported by Steve Kagl on the user's list; the posix
component (which we probably don't test regularly because we probably
only test environments where the other paffinity components are used)
was not getting built because it had a bad configure test.

This commit was SVN r20974.
2009-04-10 21:15:20 +00:00
Jeff Squyres
d1c6f3f89a * Fix a truckload of Cisco copyrights to be the same as the rest of
the code base.
 * Fix a few misspellings in other copyrights.

This commit was SVN r20241.
2009-01-11 02:30:00 +00:00
Ralph Castain
21ba1b2ec0 Modify the configure system in the paffinity framework so that only one component is built. Cleanout variable name conflicts that on some systems prevented building
This commit was SVN r19122.
2008-08-01 22:54:24 +00:00
Jeff Squyres
1a3045ff81 * Remove some extraneous AC_MSG_RESULT's
* Make the results of the top-level configure.ac test for
   _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN be cached so that we can check for it
   elsewhere (e.g., opal/mca/paffinity/posix/configure.m4)
 * Update top-level configure.ac test for _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN: stamp
   out another AC_TRY_COMPILE
 * Ensure paffinity:posix doesn't even try to compile if we don't
   have _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN
 * Minor style updates

This commit was SVN r19118.
2008-08-01 11:41:08 +00:00
Ralph Castain
fdb2408bf2 Rename the osx paffinity component the "posix" component since it really has nothing osx specific in it - it is just a generic posix call to determine #processors. Set the priority low so that both linux and solaris components override it if they build. It shouldn't build in Windows at all.
Modify the odls to remove a (size_t) typecast in front of the num_processors variable just in case it is returned negative. This usually is accompanied by an opal_error, so this shouldn't make any difference - but it is more technically correct.

This commit was SVN r19008.
2008-07-24 01:54:51 +00:00