tell if the remote proc should be in an exposure epoch or not.
Refs trac:325
This commit was SVN r11746.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 325 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/325
epoch's control data could overwrite the previous epoch's data because
we were reusing data structures between PW and SC. Instead, we now
have explicit post_msg and complete_msg counters for completion.
refs trac:354
* Only register the rdma osc callback once, as it turns out that some
btls (MX) do somethng more than update a table during the register
call, and each register call sucks up valuable fragments...
This commit was SVN r11745.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 354 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/354
long ago) supposed to be used as a cache for accessing the PML procs. But in
all of the PMLs the PML proc contain only one field i.e. a pointer to the ompi_proc.
This pointer can be accessed using the c_remote_group easily. Therefore, there is no
meaning of keeping the PML procs around. Slim fast commit ...
This commit was SVN r11730.
can be in both a Post and Start state. Also, the asserts were only
correct assuming that we were never in the post and start state at the
same time, which was obviously silly.
refs trac:303
This commit was SVN r11428.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 303 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/303
implemented entirely on top of the PML. This allows us to have a
one-sided interface even when we are using the CM PML and MTLs for
point-to-point transport (and therefore not using the BML/BTLs)
* Old pt2pt component was renamed "rdma", as it will soon be having
real RDMA support added to it.
Work was done in a temporary branch. Commit is the result of the
merge command:
svn merge -r10862:11099 https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi/tmp/bwb-osc-pt2pt
This commit was SVN r11100.
The following SVN revisions from the original message are invalid or
inconsistent and therefore were not cross-referenced:
r10862
r11099
