long ago) supposed to be used as a cache for accessing the PML procs. But in
all of the PMLs the PML proc contain only one field i.e. a pointer to the ompi_proc.
This pointer can be accessed using the c_remote_group easily. Therefore, there is no
meaning of keeping the PML procs around. Slim fast commit ...
This commit was SVN r11730.
We support all the events in the PERUSE specifications, but right now only one event
of each type can be attached to a communicator. This will be worked out in the future.
The events were places in such a way, that we will be able to measure the overhead
for our threading implementation (the cost of the synchronization objects).
This commit was SVN r9500.
to let the PML (or io, more generally the low level request manager)
to have it's own release function (what was before the req_fini). This
function will only be called from the low level while the req_free will
be called from the upper level (MPI layer) in order to mark the request
as not used by the user anymore.
From the request point of view the requests will be marked as inactive
everytime we read their status (true for persistent as well). As
MPI_REQUEST_NULL is already marked as inactive, the test and wait functions
are simpler. The drawback is that now we have to change in the
ompi_request_{test|wait} the req_status of the request once we get it's
status.
This commit was SVN r9290.
- initial support for gm progress thread
- corrected threading issue in pml
- added polling progress for a configurable number of cycles to wait for threaded case
This commit was SVN r9188.
of request we are playing with (send or receive). Therefore, it's useless to have another
switch inside this macro and make the code bigger. Now, we have 2 versions
MCA_PML_OB1_SEND_REQUEST_FREE and MCA_PML_OB1_RECV_REQUEST_FREE.
This commit was SVN r8945.
