long ago) supposed to be used as a cache for accessing the PML procs. But in
all of the PMLs the PML proc contain only one field i.e. a pointer to the ompi_proc.
This pointer can be accessed using the c_remote_group easily. Therefore, there is no
meaning of keeping the PML procs around. Slim fast commit ...
This commit was SVN r11730.
interconnects that provide matching logic in the library.
Currently includes support for MX and some support for
Portals
* Fix overuse of proc_pml pointer on the ompi_proc structuer,
splitting into proc_pml for pml data and proc_bml for
the BML endpoint data
* bug fixes in bsend init code, which wasn't being used by
the OB1 or DR PMLs...
This commit was SVN r10642.
add object size to opal class
no longer need the size when allocating a new object as this is stored in
the class structure
--- dr changes
Previous rev. maintained state on the communicator used for acking duplicate
fragments, but the communicator may be destroyed prior to successfull
delivery of an ack to the peer. We must therefore maintain this state
globally on a per peer, not a per peer, per communicator basis.
This requires that we use a global rank on the wire and translate this as
appropriate to a local rank within the communicator.
This commit was SVN r9454.
progress function in the mca_pml to the BML progress one, avoid having a cascade of
call to the progress function and speed up a little bit the execution.
This commit was SVN r9007.
- move files out of toplevel include/ and etc/, moving it into the
sub-projects
- rather than including config headers with <project>/include,
have them as <project>
- require all headers to be included with a project prefix, with
the exception of the config headers ({opal,orte,ompi}_config.h
mpi.h, and mpif.h)
This commit was SVN r8985.
is a lot more difficult than a PTL, and it can adapt it's behavior to the level of threading required
by the user. In this case the behavior is the priorit of the PML. Therefore this information is never
availale before the init function (of the PML) is called. So I try to keep nearly the same structure
as it was before, with one change. When a PML get initialized it does not necessarily means it has been
selected, so it does not means it has to create all it's internal structures (and select the PTL and
all this stuff). They can all be done later, when a PML knows that it definitively get selected
(when the enable function is called with the argument set to true). Thus, in the case of a PML close
one have to check if the PML has been selected or not before trying to clean up the internals.
I had to change the MPI_Init function to allow the PML to be enabled before we start adding procs inside.
This commit was SVN r6434.
- After long discussions and ruminations on how we run components in
LAM/MPI, made the decision that, by default, all components included
in Open MPI will use the version number of their parent project
(i.e., OMPI or ORTE). They are certaint free to use a different
number, but this simplification makes the common cases easy:
- components are only released when the parent project is released
- it is easy (trivial?) to distinguish which version component goes
with with version of the parent project
- removed all autogen/configure code for templating the version .h
file in components
- made all ORTE components use ORTE_*_VERSION for version numbers
- made all OMPI components use OMPI_*_VERSION for version numbers
- removed all VERSION files from components
- configure now displays OPAL, ORTE, and OMPI version numbers
- ditto for ompi_info
- right now, faking it -- OPAL and ORTE and OMPI will always have the
same version number (i.e., they all come from the same top-level
VERSION file). But this paves the way for the Great Configure
Reorganization, where, among other things, each project will have
its own version number.
So all in all, we went from a boatload of version numbers to
[effectively] three. That's pretty good. :-)
This commit was SVN r6344.
