1
1
Граф коммитов

10 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Gilles Gouaillardet
b5aea782ce Revert "Fix heterogeneous support"
Per the discussion at http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/10/16050.php

This reverts commit c9c5d4011b.
2014-10-16 12:24:38 +09:00
Gilles Gouaillardet
c9c5d4011b Fix heterogeneous support
* redefine orte_process_name_t so it can be converted
  between host and network format as an opal_identifier_t
  aka uint64_t by the OPAL layer.
* correctly send OPAL_DSTORE_ARCH key
2014-10-15 17:19:13 +09:00
Ralph Castain
fd6a044b7f Cleanup some cruft resulting from the move of the btl's to opal. We had created the ability to delay modex operations, which included a need to delay retrieving hostname info for remote procs. This allowed us to not retrieve the modex info until first message unless required - the hostname is generally only required for debug and error messages.
Properly setup the opal_process_info structure early in the initialization procedure. Define the local hostname right at the beginning of opal_init so all parts of opal can use it. Overlay that during orte_init as the user may choose to remove fqdn and strip prefixes during that time. Setup the job_session_dir and other such info immediately when it becomes available during orte_init.
2014-10-03 16:02:57 -06:00
Ralph Castain
aec5cd08bd Per the PMIx RFC:
WHAT:    Merge the PMIx branch into the devel repo, creating a new
               OPAL “lmix” framework to abstract PMI support for all RTEs.
               Replace the ORTE daemon-level collectives with a new PMIx
               server and update the ORTE grpcomm framework to support
               server-to-server collectives

WHY:      We’ve had problems dealing with variations in PMI implementations,
               and need to extend the existing PMI definitions to meet exascale
               requirements.

WHEN:   Mon, Aug 25

WHERE:  https://github.com/rhc54/ompi-svn-mirror.git

Several community members have been working on a refactoring of the current PMI support within OMPI. Although the APIs are common, Slurm and Cray implement a different range of capabilities, and package them differently. For example, Cray provides an integrated PMI-1/2 library, while Slurm separates the two and requires the user to specify the one to be used at runtime. In addition, several bugs in the Slurm implementations have caused problems requiring extra coding.

All this has led to a slew of #if’s in the PMI code and bugs when the corner-case logic for one implementation accidentally traps the other. Extending this support to other implementations would have increased this complexity to an unacceptable level.

Accordingly, we have:

* created a new OPAL “pmix” framework to abstract the PMI support, with separate components for Cray, Slurm PMI-1, and Slurm PMI-2 implementations.

* Replaced the current ORTE grpcomm daemon-based collective operation with an integrated PMIx server, and updated the grpcomm APIs to provide more flexible, multi-algorithm support for collective operations. At this time, only the xcast and allgather operations are supported.

* Replaced the current global collective id with a signature based on the names of the participating procs. The allows an unlimited number of collectives to be executed by any group of processes, subject to the requirement that only one collective can be active at a time for a unique combination of procs. Note that a proc can be involved in any number of simultaneous collectives - it is the specific combination of procs that is subject to the constraint

* removed the prior OMPI/OPAL modex code

* added new macros for executing modex send/recv to simplify use of the new APIs. The send macros allow the caller to specify whether or not the BTL supports async modex operations - if so, then the non-blocking “fence” operation is used, if the active PMIx component supports it. Otherwise, the default is a full blocking modex exchange as we currently perform.

* retained the current flag that directs us to use a blocking fence operation, but only to retrieve data upon demand

This commit was SVN r32570.
2014-08-21 18:56:47 +00:00
Gilles Gouaillardet
3c2e75c6b7 Fix OPAL_PROCESS_NAME_xTOy for heterogeneous support
This commit was SVN r32425.
2014-08-05 05:22:50 +00:00
Ralph Castain
daeb9b6c4f Some more cleanups. Remove direct references to ORTE by changing OMPI_CAST_ORTE_NAME -> OMPI_CAST_RTE_NAME. Ensure that ORTE tools (mpirun, orted, tools) set the OPAL proc structure fields so OPAL knows what is going on and uses the correct print functions (still need to fix the problem for non-MPI apps). Properly return uint32_t from the opal utilities instead of int32_t as that is what the ORTE process name fields contain.
Thanks to Gilles for pointing out some of the discrepancies.

This commit was SVN r32398.
2014-08-01 14:44:11 +00:00
George Bosilca
f39abb9e69 Reverting r32355: a number of processes is not a notion that a low level
communication library should use to initialize itself.

Ralph will champion this change back with an RFC if there is a realistic
need/use case from the community.

This commit was SVN r32361.

The following SVN revision numbers were found above:
  r32355 --> open-mpi/ompi@c903917f47
2014-07-30 20:11:35 +00:00
Ralph Castain
c903917f47 Expose the num_procs information to the opal layer as the info is needed in several BTLs
This commit was SVN r32355.
2014-07-30 09:33:41 +00:00
George Bosilca
a3feb627cf Move some of the ompi_process_info down in OPAL.
This commit was SVN r32324.
2014-07-26 21:43:34 +00:00
Ralph Castain
552c9ca5a0 George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-)
WHAT:    Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL

All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies.  This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP.  Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose.  UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs.  A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic.

This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00