to the F90 binding for MPI_INITIALIZED was wrong (should have been
logical, not integer).
Fixes trac:782.
This commit was SVN r13170.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 782 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/782
size of the complex type as determined by configure; not the size of
the next larger complex type (i.e., a complex*N is 2 real*(N/2)'s, not
2 real*N's).
This commit was SVN r12421.
that the compiler might need to inform the compiler that a .f90 extension
means "this is Fortran 90 code". Fortran compilers are so weird.
refs trac:284
This commit was SVN r11280.
The following Trac tickets were found above:
Ticket 284 --> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/284
on almost all platforms (except OS X... sigh...). This is the merge
of r10846 - 10894 from the tmp/f90-shared branch to the trunk.
This commit was SVN r11103.
The following SVN revisions from the original message are invalid or
inconsistent and therefore were not cross-referenced:
r10846
users mailing list:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2006/07/1680.php
Warning: this log message is not for the weak. Read at your own
risk.
The problem was that we had several variables in Fortran common blocks
of various types, but their C counterparts were all of a type
equivalent to a fortran double complex. This didn't seem to matter
for the compilers that we tested, but we never tested static builds
(which is where this problem seems to occur, at least with the Intel
compiler: the linker compilains that the variable in the common block
in the user's .o file was of one size/alignment but the one in the C
library was a different size/alignment).
So this patch fixes the sizes/types of the Fortran common block
variables and their corresponding C instantiations to be of the same
sizes/types.
But wait, there's more.
We recently introduced a fix for the OSX linker where some C versions
of the fortran common block variables (e.g.,
_ompi_fortran_status_ignore) were not being found when linking
ompi_info (!). Further research shows that the code path for
ompi_info to require ompi_fortran_status_ignore is, unfortunately,
necessary (a quirk of how various components pull in different
portions of the code base -- nothing in ompi_info itself requires
fortran or MPI knowledge, of course).
Hence, the real problem was that there was no code path from ompi_info
to the portion of the code base where the C globals corresponding to
the Fortran common block variables were instantiated. This is because
the OSX linker does not automatically pull in .o files that only
contain unintialized global variables; the OSX linker typically only
pulls in a .o file from a library if it either has a function that is
used or have a global variable that is initialized (that's the short
version; lots of details and corner cases omitted). Hence, we changed
the global C variables corresponding to the fortran common blocks to
be initialized, thereby causing the OSX linker to pull them in
automatically -- problem solved. At the same time, we moved the
constants to another .c file with a function, just for good measure.
However, this didn't really solve the problem:
1. The function in the file with the C versions of the fortran common
block variables (ompi/mpi/f77/test_constants_f.c) did not have a
code path that was reachable from ompi_info, so the only reason
that the constants were found (on OSX) was because they were
initialized in the global scope (i.e., causing the OSX compiler to
pull in that .o file).
2. Initializing these variable in the global scope causes problems for
some linkers where -- once all the size/type problems mentioned
above were fixed -- the alignments of fortran common blocks and C
global variables do not match (even though the types of the Fortran
and C variables match -- wow!). Hence, initializing the C
variables would not necessarily match the alignment of what Fortran
expected, and the linker would issue a warning (i.e., the alignment
warnings referenced in the original post).
The solution is two-fold:
1. Move the Fortran variables from test_constants_f.c to
ompi/mpi/runtime/ompi_mpi_init.c where there are other global
constants that *are* initialized (that had nothing to do with
fortran, so the alignment issues described above are not a factor),
and therefore all linkers (including the OSX linker) will pull in
this .o file and find all the symbols that it needs.
2. Do not initialize the C variables corresponding to the Fortran
common blocks in the global scope. Indeed, never initialize them
at all (because we never need their *values* - we only check for
their *locations*). Since nothing is ever written to these
variables (particularly in the global scope), the linker does not
see any alignment differences during initialization, but does make
both the C and Fortran variables have the same addresses (this
method has been working in LAM/MPI for over a decade).
There were some comments here in the OMPI code base and in the LAM
code base that stated/implied that C variables corresponding to
Fortran common blocks had to have the same alignment as the Fortran
common blocks (i.e., 16). There were attempts in both code bases to
ensure that this was true. However, the attempts were wrong (in both
code bases), and I have now read enough Fortran compiler documentation
to convince myself that matching alignments is not required (indeed,
it's beyond our control). As long as C variables corresponding to
Fortran common blocks are not initialized in the global scope, the
linker will "figure it out" and adjust the alignment to whatever is
required (i.e., the greater of the alignments). Specifically (to
counter comments that no longer exist in the OMPI code base but still
exist in the LAM code base):
- there is no need to make attempts to specially align C variables
corresponding to Fortran common blocks
- the types and sizes of C variables corresponding to Fortran common
blocks should match, but do not need to be on any particular
alignment
Finally, as a side effect of this effort, I found a bunch of
inconsistencies with the intent of status/array_of_statuses
parameters. For all the functions that I modified they should be
"out" (not inout).
This commit was SVN r11057.
with the other methodology even if there are no choice buffers and no
special constants. But it keeps the Makefile.am simple and the
methodology consistent.
This commit was SVN r10462.
was that declaring the type of MPI_WTICK and MPI_TIME in mpif-common.h
would allow the F90 bindings to call through to the back end f77
function and have the right return type. But upon reflection, that's
silly -- we were just declaring the variables MPI_WTICK and MPI_WTIME
that were of type double precision. Duh.
So add some fixed (non-generated) wrapper F90 functions to call the
back-end *C* MPI_WTICK and MPI_TIME functions (vs. the back end *F77*
functions). We have to call the back-end C functions because there's
a name conflict if we try to call the back-end F77 functions -- for
the same reasons that we can't "implicitly" define MPI_WTIME and
MPI_WTICK in the f90 module, we can't call such an implicitly-defined
function. So we had to add new back-end C functions that are directly
callable from Fortran, the easiest implementation of which was to
provide 4 one-line functions for each (rather than muck around with
weak symbols).
This commit was SVN r10448.
* Change the type of Fortan's MPI_STATUSES_IGNORE to double complex
so that it will never possibly be mistaken for a real status (i.e.,
integer(MPI_STATUS_SIZE)), particularly in the F90 bindings. See
comment in mpif-common.h explaining this (analogous argument to
MPI_ARGVS_NULL for MPI_COMM_SPAWN_MULTIPLE).
* Add second interfaces for the following functions that take a double
complex (i.e., MPI_STATUSES_IGNORE). This required adding the second
interface in mpi-f90-interfaces.h[.sh] and then generating new wrapper
functions to call the back-end F77 function for each of these four, so
we added 4 new files in ompi/mpi/f90/scripts/ and updated the various
Makefile.am's to match:
* MPI_TESTALL
* MPI_TESTSOME
* MPI_WAITALL
* MPI_WAITSOME
The XSL is now not in sync with the scripts. Although I suppose that
that is becoming less and less important (because it does not impact
the end user at all -- to be 100% explicit, no release should ever be
held up because the XSL is out of sync), but it will probably be
important when we go to fix the "large" interface; so it's still worth
fixing... for now...
This commit was SVN r10281.
- Make the F90 bindings compile and link properly with gfortran 4.0,
4.1, Intel 9.0, PGI 6.1, Sun (don't know version offhand -- the most
current as of this writing, I think), and NAG 5.2, although some
have limitations (e.g., NAG can't seem to handle the medium and
large sizes)
- Building the F90 "small" module size is now the default, even for
developers
- Split up mpif.h into multiple files because parts of it were toxic
to the F90 bindings
- Properly specify unsized/unshaped arrays to make the bindings work
on all known compilers
- Make ompi_info show Fortran 90 bindings size
- XML somewhat lags the generated scripts as of this commit, but
functionality was my main goal -- the XML can be updated later (if
at all).
This commit was SVN r10118.
- split mpif.h into mpif.h and mpif-common.h[.in]
- mpif-common.h is included by various f90 things and contains output
from configure
- mpif.h defines some f77-specific stuff and then includes
mpif-common.h
This commit was SVN r9997.
svn merge -r 9453:9609 https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi/tmp/f90-stuff .
Several improvements over the current F90 MPI bindings:
- The capability to make 4 sizes of the F90 bindings:
- trivial: only the F90-specific MPI functions (sizeof and a few
others)
- small: (this is the default) all MPI functions that do not take
choice buffers
- medium: small + all MPI functions that take one choice buffer
(e.g., MPI_SEND)
- large: all MPI functions, but those that take 2 choice buffers
(e.g., MPI_GATHER) only allow both buffers to be of the same type
- Remove all non-standard MPI types (LOGICAL*x, CHARACTER*x)
- Remove use of selected_*_kind() and only use MPI-defined types
(INTEGER*x, etc.)
- Decrease complexity of the F90 configure and build system
This commit was SVN r9610.
case still compile properly, even though these bindings were wrong. :-(
- Both interface functions are necessary.
- I accidentally had a subroutine interface named the same thing as the
back-end F77 function -- a definite no-no. Ensure that all F90
interface functions have a suffix to make them different than the
back-end F77 function names.
- Also parameterize the output() subroutine on the type of the argvs
parameter to switch between the character arrays and the integer.
This commit was SVN r9202.
they will match the prototypes in the [styictly-typed] MPI F90
bindings. Specifically, fix up MPI_COMM_SPAWN and
MPI_COMM_SPAWN_MULTIPLE so that the constants MPI_ARGV_NULL,
MPI_ERRCODES_IGNORE, and MPI_ARGVS_NULL can be used in the F90
bindings. Thanks to Michael Kluskens for pointing this out to us.
Some work still remains in the F90 bindings -- we are missing all
places where choice buffers can be of type CHARACTER.
This commit was SVN r9198.
support for Fortran 90 module flags in the wrapper compilers when I
re-wrote them to be less project-specific. Re-add that support and drop
the ugly install in include hack I had done.
This commit was SVN r9003.
changes. The two Big Changes are elegance (much more re-use of code
rather than cut-n-pasting the same code over and over and over and...)
and enabling cross-compilation for F77 and F90 (because we actually
have to *run* some compiled F77 and F90 programs for some of the
tests, which obviously won't work in a cross-compilation environment
-- so enable the use of config.cache to load such values in
cross-compiling environments).
This commit was SVN r8991.
- move files out of toplevel include/ and etc/, moving it into the
sub-projects
- rather than including config headers with <project>/include,
have them as <project>
- require all headers to be included with a project prefix, with
the exception of the config headers ({opal,orte,ompi}_config.h
mpi.h, and mpif.h)
This commit was SVN r8985.
It appears that some compilers look in the library paths and others in
the include paths, so just have both available and save ourselves the
trouble.
This commit was SVN r8897.
