1
1

3 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Jeff Squyres
65161c1dfe Fix the fortran 90 checks in two ways:
- Make the F90 checks use the identical types to the F77 checks (e.g.,
  INTEGER*4, as opposed to potential selected_int_kind() equivalents)
- Comment out the F77 and F90 alignment check failure -- there is some
  confusion here; some vendors apparently told Craig R. yesterday that
  they change the alignments of types based on whether the instance is
  a standalone variable, in an array, or a member of a struct.  

More investigation is needed (and potentially clarification for MPI
users -- this could be quite problematic!), but this alignment test is
otherwise hosing the nightlies, so it needs to be taken out for the
moment.

This commit was SVN r9031.
2006-02-14 13:05:37 +00:00
Jeff Squyres
681d46ac56 Fix problem with the AC_DEFINE's for the F90 check. Must use m4
mutilations in AC_DEFINE or autoheader will not pick up the symbols
and add them to opal_config.h.in.

This commit was SVN r9026.
2006-02-14 05:22:49 +00:00
Jeff Squyres
bc47a24bee Bring the f90 configuration up to speed with the f77 configuration
changes.  The two Big Changes are elegance (much more re-use of code
rather than cut-n-pasting the same code over and over and over and...)
and enabling cross-compilation for F77 and F90 (because we actually
have to *run* some compiled F77 and F90 programs for some of the
tests, which obviously won't work in a cross-compilation environment
-- so enable the use of config.cache to load such values in
cross-compiling environments).

This commit was SVN r8991.
2006-02-12 15:11:36 +00:00