1
1

Somehow we lost one of the most critical parameter

allowing the PML to decide how to order the different
interconnects. Bring it back !
Этот коммит содержится в:
George Bosilca 2015-02-10 20:32:05 -05:00
родитель 7f4c5fa96f
Коммит e173f9b0c0

Просмотреть файл

@ -117,11 +117,16 @@ int mca_btl_base_param_register(mca_base_component_t *version,
MCA_BASE_VAR_SCOPE_READONLY,
&module->btl_min_rdma_pipeline_size);
(void) mca_base_component_var_register(version, "bandwidth", "Approximate maximum bandwidth of interconnect (0 = auto-detect value at run-time [not supported in all BTL modules], >= 1 = bandwidth in Mbps)",
(void) mca_base_component_var_register(version, "latency", "Approximate latency of interconnect (0 = auto-detect value at run-time [not supported in all BTL modules], >= 1 = latency in microseconds)",
MCA_BASE_VAR_TYPE_UNSIGNED_INT, NULL, 0, 0,
OPAL_INFO_LVL_5,
MCA_BASE_VAR_SCOPE_READONLY,
&module->btl_latency);
(void) mca_base_component_var_register(version, "bandwidth", "Approximate maximum bandwidth of interconnect (0 = auto-detect value at run-time [not supported in all BTL modules], >= 1 = bandwidth in Mbps)",
MCA_BASE_VAR_TYPE_UNSIGNED_INT, NULL, 0, 0,
OPAL_INFO_LVL_5,
MCA_BASE_VAR_SCOPE_READONLY,
&module->btl_bandwidth);
}
return mca_btl_base_param_verify(module);