From c9a8217af6fa5f7d6304fa51d0f9284f669eace6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Barrett Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 21:18:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Portals 4 doesn't have a BTL, need to default to MTL, rather than finding some stupid slow BTL. THis selection logic sucks. This commit was SVN r28704. --- ompi/mca/pml/cm/pml_cm_component.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ompi/mca/pml/cm/pml_cm_component.c b/ompi/mca/pml/cm/pml_cm_component.c index 7d7a7d09ec..f383592d26 100644 --- a/ompi/mca/pml/cm/pml_cm_component.c +++ b/ompi/mca/pml/cm/pml_cm_component.c @@ -155,7 +155,8 @@ mca_pml_cm_component_init(int* priority, *priority = -1; return NULL; } else if((strcmp(ompi_mtl_base_selected_component->mtl_version.mca_component_name, "psm") == 0) || - (strcmp(ompi_mtl_base_selected_component->mtl_version.mca_component_name, "mxm") == 0)) { + (strcmp(ompi_mtl_base_selected_component->mtl_version.mca_component_name, "mxm") == 0) || + (strcmp(ompi_mtl_base_selected_component->mtl_version.mca_component_name, "portals4") == 0)) { /* * If MTL is MXM or PSM then up our priority * For every other communication layer having MTLs and BTLs, the user/admin