1
1

Looks like MAX is not a standard macro. Anyway, that the heavy requests is larger than the thin

seems to be a "correct" assumption.

This commit was SVN r15348.
Этот коммит содержится в:
George Bosilca 2007-07-11 00:04:33 +00:00
родитель e19777e910
Коммит 9b501eb66d

Просмотреть файл

@ -57,8 +57,7 @@ mca_pml_cm_enable(bool enable)
/* BWB - FIX ME - need to have this actually do something, /* BWB - FIX ME - need to have this actually do something,
maybe? */ maybe? */
ompi_free_list_init(&mca_pml_base_send_requests, ompi_free_list_init(&mca_pml_base_send_requests,
MAX(sizeof(mca_pml_cm_thin_send_request_t), sizeof(mca_pml_cm_hvy_send_request_t) + ompi_mtl->mtl_request_size,
sizeof(mca_pml_cm_hvy_send_request_t)) + ompi_mtl->mtl_request_size,
OBJ_CLASS(mca_pml_cm_hvy_send_request_t), OBJ_CLASS(mca_pml_cm_hvy_send_request_t),
ompi_pml_cm.free_list_num, ompi_pml_cm.free_list_num,
ompi_pml_cm.free_list_max, ompi_pml_cm.free_list_max,
@ -66,8 +65,7 @@ mca_pml_cm_enable(bool enable)
NULL); NULL);
ompi_free_list_init(&mca_pml_base_send_requests, ompi_free_list_init(&mca_pml_base_send_requests,
MAX(sizeof(mca_pml_cm_thin_recv_request_t), sizeof(mca_pml_cm_hvy_recv_request_t) + ompi_mtl->mtl_request_size,
sizeof(mca_pml_cm_hvy_recv_request_t)) + ompi_mtl->mtl_request_size,
OBJ_CLASS(mca_pml_cm_hvy_recv_request_t), OBJ_CLASS(mca_pml_cm_hvy_recv_request_t),
ompi_pml_cm.free_list_num, ompi_pml_cm.free_list_num,
ompi_pml_cm.free_list_max, ompi_pml_cm.free_list_max,