From 66acac8ff30c38e451de63adabbde0464d64e161 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Donald Kerr Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:01:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] the value for invalid idx was just plain wrong, a more appropriate value is now used This commit was SVN r17201. --- ompi/mca/btl/udapl/btl_udapl_proc.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ompi/mca/btl/udapl/btl_udapl_proc.h b/ompi/mca/btl/udapl/btl_udapl_proc.h index 356fdd0885..3a9b882dd9 100644 --- a/ompi/mca/btl/udapl/btl_udapl_proc.h +++ b/ompi/mca/btl/udapl/btl_udapl_proc.h @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ struct mca_btl_udapl_proc_t { typedef struct mca_btl_udapl_proc_t mca_btl_udapl_proc_t; OBJ_CLASS_DECLARATION(mca_btl_udapl_proc_t); -#define MCA_BTL_UDAPL_INVALID_PEER_ADDR_IDX 4294967295 +#define MCA_BTL_UDAPL_INVALID_PEER_ADDR_IDX -1 mca_btl_udapl_proc_t* mca_btl_udapl_proc_create(ompi_proc_t* ompi_proc); int mca_btl_udapl_proc_insert(mca_btl_udapl_proc_t*, mca_btl_base_endpoint_t*);