From 4d2b3e859def88f6cbce8a75d6546b20d5beb88c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Edgar Gabriel Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 21:33:44 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] fix the indenting from tabs to spaces :-) This commit was SVN r14211. --- ompi/communicator/comm_init.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/ompi/communicator/comm_init.c b/ompi/communicator/comm_init.c index 4a29e86174..165a4b53ce 100644 --- a/ompi/communicator/comm_init.c +++ b/ompi/communicator/comm_init.c @@ -216,21 +216,21 @@ int ompi_comm_finalize(void) OBJ_DESTRUCT (ompi_mpi_comm_parent); /* Please note, that the we did increase the reference count - for ompi_mpi_comm_null, ompi_mpi_group_null, and - ompi_mpi_errors_are_fatal in ompi_comm_init because of + for ompi_mpi_comm_null, ompi_mpi_group_null, and + ompi_mpi_errors_are_fatal in ompi_comm_init because of ompi_mpi_comm_parent. In case a parent communicator is really created, the ref. counters - for these objects are decreased again by one. However, in a - static scenario, we should ideally decrease the ref. counter - for these objects by one here. The problem just is, that - if the app had a parent_comm, and this has been freed/disconnected, - ompi_comm_parent points again to ompi_comm_null, the reference count + for these objects are decreased again by one. However, in a + static scenario, we should ideally decrease the ref. counter + for these objects by one here. The problem just is, that + if the app had a parent_comm, and this has been freed/disconnected, + ompi_comm_parent points again to ompi_comm_null, the reference count for these objects has not been increased again. - So the point is, if ompi_mpi_comm_parent == &ompi_mpi_comm_null - we do not know whether we have to decrease the ref count for - those three objects or not. Since this is a constant, non-increasing - amount of memory, we stick with the current solution for now, - namely don't do anything. + So the point is, if ompi_mpi_comm_parent == &ompi_mpi_comm_null + we do not know whether we have to decrease the ref count for + those three objects or not. Since this is a constant, non-increasing + amount of memory, we stick with the current solution for now, + namely don't do anything. */ }