ports/openmpi
ports/openmpi
1
1
Форкнуть 0
Код Релизы Активность

Update -Wno-long-double test to support clang.

Просмотр исходного кода 
This prevents bazillions of warnings from clang tha -Wno-long-double
isn't supported.

The warning that clang issues when it see -Wno-long-double is does not
use any of the words we were looking for, so I added "unknown" to the
list of words to look for.  I also re-indented the two m4 tests so
that they're a bit more readable.

cmr=v1.7.4:reviewer=brbarret:subject=Update -Wno-long-double test to support clang

This commit was SVN r29681.
Этот коммит содержится в:
Jeff Squyres 2013-11-13 15:08:01 +00:00
родитель 4964a5e98b
Коммит 05f4f62db1
2 изменённых файлов: 47 добавлений и 41 удалений
Показать статистику Скачать Patch файл Скачать Diff файл Показать все файлы Свернуть все файлы

10
config/opal_setup_cc.m4
Просмотреть файл

@ -148,14 +148,15 @@ AC_DEFUN([OPAL_SETUP_CC],[
[ompi_cv_cc_wno_long_double], [ompi_cv_cc_wno_long_double],
[AC_TRY_COMPILE([], [], [AC_TRY_COMPILE([], [],
[ [
dnl Alright, the -Wno-long-double did not produce any errors... dnl So -Wno-long-double did not produce any errors...
dnl Well well, try to extract a warning regarding unrecognized or ignored options dnl We will try to extract a warning regarding
dnl unrecognized or ignored options
AC_TRY_COMPILE([], [long double test;], AC_TRY_COMPILE([], [long double test;],
[ [
ompi_cv_cc_wno_long_double="yes" ompi_cv_cc_wno_long_double="yes"
if test -s conftest.err ; then if test -s conftest.err ; then
dnl Yes, it should be "ignor", in order to catch ignoring and ignore dnl Yes, it should be "ignor", in order to catch ignoring and ignore
for i in invalid ignor unrecognized ; do for i in unknown invalid ignor unrecognized ; do
$GREP -iq $i conftest.err $GREP -iq $i conftest.err
if test "$?" = "0" ; then if test "$?" = "0" ; then
ompi_cv_cc_wno_long_double="no" ompi_cv_cc_wno_long_double="no"
@ -165,7 +166,8 @@ AC_DEFUN([OPAL_SETUP_CC],[
fi fi
], ],
[ompi_cv_cc_wno_long_double="no"])], [ompi_cv_cc_wno_long_double="no"])],
[ompi_cv_cc_wno_long_double="no"])]) [ompi_cv_cc_wno_long_double="no"])
])
CFLAGS="$CFLAGS_orig" CFLAGS="$CFLAGS_orig"
if test "$ompi_cv_cc_wno_long_double" = "yes" ; then if test "$ompi_cv_cc_wno_long_double" = "yes" ; then

18
config/opal_setup_cxx.m4
Просмотреть файл

@ -111,24 +111,28 @@ AC_DEFUN([_OPAL_SETUP_CXX_COMPILER_BACKEND],[
AC_CACHE_CHECK([if $CXX supports -Wno-long-double], AC_CACHE_CHECK([if $CXX supports -Wno-long-double],
[opal_cv_cxx_wno_long_double], [opal_cv_cxx_wno_long_double],
[AC_TRY_COMPILE([], [], [AC_TRY_COMPILE([], [],
[dnl Alright, the -Wno-long-double did not produce any errors... [
dnl Well well, try to extract a warning regarding unrecognized or ignored options dnl So -Wno-long-double did not produce any errors...
dnl We will try to extract a warning regarding
dnl unrecognized or ignored options
AC_TRY_COMPILE([], [long double test;], AC_TRY_COMPILE([], [long double test;],
[ [
opal_cv_cxx_wno_long_double="yes" ompi_cv_cxx_wno_long_double="yes"
if test -s conftest.err ; then if test -s conftest.err ; then
dnl Yes, it should be "ignor", in order to catch ignoring and ignore dnl Yes, it should be "ignor", in order to catch ignoring and ignore
for i in invalid ignor unrecognized ; do for i in unknown invalid ignor unrecognized ; do
$GREP -iq $i conftest.err $GREP -iq $i conftest.err
if test "$?" = "0" ; then if test "$?" = "0" ; then
opal_cv_cxx_wno_long_double="no", ompi_cv_cxx_wno_long_double="no"
break; break;
fi fi
done done
fi fi
], ],
[opal_cv_cxx_wno_long_double="no"])], [ompi_cv_cxx_wno_long_double="no"])],
[opal_cv_cxx_wno_long_double="no"])]) [ompi_cv_cxx_wno_long_double="no"])
])
CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS_orig" CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS_orig"
AC_LANG_POP(C++) AC_LANG_POP(C++)
if test "$opal_cv_cxx_wno_long_double" = "yes" ; then if test "$opal_cv_cxx_wno_long_double" = "yes" ; then