1
1
openmpi/opal/mca/btl/base/btl_base_error.h

100 строки
4.3 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/*
* Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Trustees of Indiana University and Indiana
* University Research and Technology
* Corporation. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2004-2011 The University of Tennessee and The University
* of Tennessee Research Foundation. All rights
* reserved.
2015-06-23 20:59:57 -07:00
* Copyright (c) 2004-2005 High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart,
* University of Stuttgart. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Regents of the University of California.
* All rights reserved.
This commit represents a bunch of work on a Mercurial side branch. As such, the commit message back to the master SVN repository is fairly long. = ORTE Job-Level Output Messages = Add two new interfaces that should be used for all new code throughout the ORTE and OMPI layers (we already make the search-and-replace on the existing ORTE / OMPI layers): * orte_output(): (and corresponding friends ORTE_OUTPUT, orte_output_verbose, etc.) This function sends the output directly to the HNP for processing as part of a job-specific output channel. It supports all the same outputs as opal_output() (syslog, file, stdout, stderr), but for stdout/stderr, the output is sent to the HNP for processing and output. More on this below. * orte_show_help(): This function is a drop-in-replacement for opal_show_help(), with two differences in functionality: 1. the rendered text help message output is sent to the HNP for display (rather than outputting directly into the process' stderr stream) 1. the HNP detects duplicate help messages and does not display them (so that you don't see the same error message N times, once from each of your N MPI processes); instead, it counts "new" instances of the help message and displays a message every ~5 seconds when there are new ones ("I got X new copies of the help message...") opal_show_help and opal_output still exist, but they only output in the current process. The intent for the new orte_* functions is that they can apply job-level intelligence to the output. As such, we recommend that all new ORTE and OMPI code use the new orte_* functions, not thei opal_* functions. === New code === For ORTE and OMPI programmers, here's what you need to do differently in new code: * Do not include opal/util/show_help.h or opal/util/output.h. Instead, include orte/util/output.h (this one header file has declarations for both the orte_output() series of functions and orte_show_help()). * Effectively s/opal_output/orte_output/gi throughout your code. Note that orte_output_open() takes a slightly different argument list (as a way to pass data to the filtering stream -- see below), so you if explicitly call opal_output_open(), you'll need to slightly adapt to the new signature of orte_output_open(). * Literally s/opal_show_help/orte_show_help/. The function signature is identical. === Notes === * orte_output'ing to stream 0 will do similar to what opal_output'ing did, so leaving a hard-coded "0" as the first argument is safe. * For systems that do not use ORTE's RML or the HNP, the effect of orte_output_* and orte_show_help will be identical to their opal counterparts (the additional information passed to orte_output_open() will be lost!). Indeed, the orte_* functions simply become trivial wrappers to their opal_* counterparts. Note that we have not tested this; the code is simple but it is quite possible that we mucked something up. = Filter Framework = Messages sent view the new orte_* functions described above and messages output via the IOF on the HNP will now optionally be passed through a new "filter" framework before being output to stdout/stderr. The "filter" OPAL MCA framework is intended to allow preprocessing to messages before they are sent to their final destinations. The first component that was written in the filter framework was to create an XML stream, segregating all the messages into different XML tags, etc. This will allow 3rd party tools to read the stdout/stderr from the HNP and be able to know exactly what each text message is (e.g., a help message, another OMPI infrastructure message, stdout from the user process, stderr from the user process, etc.). Filtering is not active by default. Filter components must be specifically requested, such as: {{{ $ mpirun --mca filter xml ... }}} There can only be one filter component active. = New MCA Parameters = The new functionality described above introduces two new MCA parameters: * '''orte_base_help_aggregate''': Defaults to 1 (true), meaning that help messages will be aggregated, as described above. If set to 0, all help messages will be displayed, even if they are duplicates (i.e., the original behavior). * '''orte_base_show_output_recursions''': An MCA parameter to help debug one of the known issues, described below. It is likely that this MCA parameter will disappear before v1.3 final. = Known Issues = * The XML filter component is not complete. The current output from this component is preliminary and not real XML. A bit more work needs to be done to configure.m4 search for an appropriate XML library/link it in/use it at run time. * There are possible recursion loops in the orte_output() and orte_show_help() functions -- e.g., if RML send calls orte_output() or orte_show_help(). We have some ideas how to fix these, but figured that it was ok to commit before feature freeze with known issues. The code currently contains sub-optimal workarounds so that this will not be a problem, but it would be good to actually solve the problem rather than have hackish workarounds before v1.3 final. This commit was SVN r18434.
2008-05-13 20:00:55 +00:00
* Copyright (c) 2007-2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2012 Los Alamos National Security, LLC.
* All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2013-2014 Intel, Inc. All rights reserved
As per the email discussion, revise the sparse handling of hostnames so that we avoid potential infinite loops while allowing large-scale users to improve their startup time: * add a new MCA param orte_hostname_cutoff to specify the number of nodes at which we stop including hostnames. This defaults to INT_MAX => always include hostnames. If a value is given, then we will include hostnames for any allocation smaller than the given limit. * remove ompi_proc_get_hostname. Replace all occurrences with a direct link to ompi_proc_t's proc_hostname, protected by appropriate "if NULL" * modify the OMPI-ORTE integration component so that any call to modex_recv automatically loads the ompi_proc_t->proc_hostname field as well as returning the requested info. Thus, any process whose modex info you retrieve will automatically receive the hostname. Note that on-demand retrieval is still enabled - i.e., if we are running under direct launch with PMI, the hostname will be fetched upon first call to modex_recv, and then the ompi_proc_t->proc_hostname field will be loaded * removed a stale MCA param "mpi_keep_peer_hostnames" that was no longer used anywhere in the code base * added an envar lookup in ess/pmi for the number of nodes in the allocation. Sadly, PMI itself doesn't provide that info, so we have to get it a different way. Currently, we support PBS-based systems and SLURM - for any other, rank0 will emit a warning and we assume max number of daemons so we will always retain hostnames This commit was SVN r29052.
2013-08-20 18:59:36 +00:00
* $COPYRIGHT$
2015-06-23 20:59:57 -07:00
*
* Additional copyrights may follow
2015-06-23 20:59:57 -07:00
*
* $HEADER$
*/
#ifndef MCA_BTL_BASE_ERROR_H
#define MCA_BTL_BASE_ERROR_H
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
#include "opal_config.h"
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
#include "opal/util/proc.h"
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
OPAL_DECLSPEC extern int mca_btl_base_verbose;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
OPAL_DECLSPEC extern int mca_btl_base_err(const char*, ...) __opal_attribute_format__(__printf__, 1, 2);
OPAL_DECLSPEC extern int mca_btl_base_out(const char*, ...) __opal_attribute_format__(__printf__, 1, 2);
#define BTL_OUTPUT(args) \
do { \
mca_btl_base_out("[%s]%s[%s:%d:%s] ", \
opal_process_info.nodename, \
OPAL_NAME_PRINT(OPAL_PROC_MY_NAME), \
__FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
mca_btl_base_out args; \
mca_btl_base_out("\n"); \
} while(0);
#define BTL_ERROR(args) \
do { \
mca_btl_base_err("[%s]%s[%s:%d:%s] ", \
opal_process_info.nodename, \
OPAL_NAME_PRINT(OPAL_PROC_MY_NAME), \
__FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
mca_btl_base_err args; \
mca_btl_base_err("\n"); \
} while(0);
#define BTL_PEER_ERROR(proc, args) \
do { \
mca_btl_base_err("%s[%s:%d:%s] from %s ", \
OPAL_NAME_PRINT(OPAL_PROC_MY_NAME), \
__FILE__, __LINE__, __func__, \
opal_process_info.nodename); \
if (proc) { \
mca_btl_base_err("to: %s ", \
opal_get_proc_hostname(proc)); \
} \
mca_btl_base_err args; \
mca_btl_base_err("\n"); \
} while(0);
#if OPAL_ENABLE_DEBUG
#define BTL_VERBOSE(args) \
do { \
if(mca_btl_base_verbose > 0) { \
mca_btl_base_err("[%s]%s[%s:%d:%s] ", \
opal_process_info.nodename, \
OPAL_NAME_PRINT(OPAL_PROC_MY_NAME), \
__FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
mca_btl_base_err args; \
mca_btl_base_err("\n"); \
} \
2015-06-23 20:59:57 -07:00
} while(0);
#else
2015-06-23 20:59:57 -07:00
#define BTL_VERBOSE(args)
#endif
#endif
BEGIN_C_DECLS
2015-06-23 20:59:57 -07:00
OPAL_DECLSPEC extern void mca_btl_base_error_no_nics(const char* transport,
const char* nic_name);
END_C_DECLS