1
1
openmpi/opal/mca/btl/usnic/btl_usnic_map.c

280 строки
7.9 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/*
* Copyright (c) 2013-2016 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
ompi_proc_t size reduction: part 1 We currently save the hostname of a proc when we create the ompi_proc_t for it. This was originally done because the only method we had for discovering the host of a proc was to include that info in the modex, and we had to therefore store it somewhere proc-local. Obviously, this ccarried a memory penalty for storing all those strings, and so we added a "cutoff" parameter so that we wouldn't collect hostnames above a certain number of procs. Unfortunately, this still results in an 8-byte/proc memory cost as we have a char* pointer in the opal_proc_t that is contained in the ompi_proc_t so that we can store the hostname of the other procs if we fall below the cutoff. At scale, this can consume a fair amount of memory. With the switch to relying on PMIx, there is no longer a need to cache the proc hostnames. Using the "optional" feature of PMIx_Get, we restrict the retrieval to be purely proc-local - i.e., we retrieve the info either via shared memory or from within the proc-internal hash storage (depending upon the active PMIx components). Thus, the retrieval of a hostname is purely a local operation involving no communication. All RM's are required to provide a complete hostname map of all procs at startup. Thus, we have full access to all hostnames without including them in a modex or having to cache them on each proc. This allows us to remove the char* pointer from the opal_proc_t, saving us 8-bytes/proc. Unfortunately, PMIx_Get does not currently support the return of a static pointer to memory. Thus, even though PMIx has the hostname in its memory, it can only return a malloc'd version of it. I have therefore ensured that the return from opal_get_proc_hostname is consistently malloc'd and free'd wherever used. This shouldn't be a burden as the hostname is only used in one of two circumstances: (a) in an error message (b) in a verbose output for debugging purposes Thus, there should be no performance penalty associated with the malloc/free requirement. PMIx will eventually be returning static pointers, and so we can eventually simplify this method and return a "const char*" - but as noted, this really isn't an issue even today. Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain <rhc@pmix.org>
2020-03-22 07:41:54 -07:00
* Copyright (c) 2014-2020 Intel, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2018 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. All Rights reserved.
* $COPYRIGHT$
*
* Additional copyrights may follow
*
* $HEADER$
*/
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
#include "opal_config.h"
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include "opal/util/show_help.h"
#include "opal/util/printf.h"
#include "btl_usnic_compat.h"
#include "btl_usnic.h"
#include "btl_usnic_module.h"
#include "btl_usnic_util.h"
#include "btl_usnic_proc.h"
/*
* qsort helper: compare modules by fabric name
*/
static int map_compare_modules(const void *aa, const void *bb)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *a = *((opal_btl_usnic_module_t**) aa);
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *b = *((opal_btl_usnic_module_t**) bb);
return strcmp(a->linux_device_name,
b->linux_device_name);
}
/*
* Helper function to output "device:" lines
*/
static int map_output_modules(FILE *fp)
{
int i;
size_t size;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
opal_btl_usnic_module_t **modules;
struct fi_usnic_info *uip;
char ipv4[IPV4STRADDRLEN];
struct sockaddr_in *sin;
int prefix_len;
fprintf(fp, "# Devices possibly used by this process:\n");
/* First, we must sort the modules (by device name) so that
they're always output in a repeatable order. */
size = mca_btl_usnic_component.num_modules *
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_module_t*);
modules = calloc(1, size);
if (NULL == modules) {
return OPAL_ERR_IN_ERRNO;
}
memcpy(modules, mca_btl_usnic_component.usnic_active_modules, size);
qsort(modules, mca_btl_usnic_component.num_modules,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_module_t*), map_compare_modules);
/* Loop over and print the sorted module device information */
for (i = 0; i < mca_btl_usnic_component.num_modules; ++i) {
uip = &modules[i]->usnic_info;
sin = modules[i]->fabric_info->src_addr;
2015-02-03 10:23:44 -08:00
prefix_len = usnic_netmask_to_cidrlen(uip->ui.v1.ui_netmask_be);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
opal_btl_usnic_snprintf_ipv4_addr(ipv4, IPV4STRADDRLEN,
sin->sin_addr.s_addr,
prefix_len);
fprintf(fp, "device=%s,ip=%s,mss=%" PRIsize_t "\n",
modules[i]->linux_device_name,
ipv4, modules[i]->fabric_info->ep_attr->max_msg_size);
}
/* Free the temp array */
free(modules);
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
}
/************************************************************************/
/*
* qsort helper: compare endpoints by fabric name
*/
static int map_compare_endpoints(const void *aa, const void *bb)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t *a = *((opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t**) aa);
opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t *b = *((opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t**) bb);
if (NULL == a && NULL == b) {
return 0;
} else if (NULL == a) {
return 1;
} else if (NULL == b) {
return -1;
}
return strcmp(a->endpoint_module->linux_device_name,
b->endpoint_module->linux_device_name);
}
/*
* Helper function to output devices for a single peer
*/
static int map_output_endpoints(FILE *fp, opal_btl_usnic_proc_t *proc)
{
size_t i;
size_t num_output;
size_t size;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t **eps;
char ipv4[IPV4STRADDRLEN];
/* First, we must sort the endpoints on this proc by MCW rank so
that they're always output in a repeatable order. There may
also be NULL endpoints (if we didn't match that peer's
endpoint). The sort will put NULLs at the end of the array,
where they can be easily ignored. */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
size = proc->proc_endpoint_count * sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t *);
eps = calloc(1, size);
if (NULL == eps) {
return OPAL_ERR_IN_ERRNO;
}
memcpy(eps, proc->proc_endpoints, size);
qsort(eps, proc->proc_endpoint_count,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t*),
map_compare_endpoints);
/* Loop over and print the sorted endpoint information, ignoring
NULLs that might be at the end of the array. */
for (num_output = i = 0; i < proc->proc_endpoint_count; ++i) {
if (NULL == eps[i]) {
break;
}
if (num_output > 0) {
fprintf(fp, ",");
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
opal_btl_usnic_snprintf_ipv4_addr(ipv4, IPV4STRADDRLEN,
eps[i]->endpoint_remote_modex.ipv4_addr,
eps[i]->endpoint_remote_modex.netmask);
fprintf(fp, "device=%s@peer_ip=%s",
eps[i]->endpoint_module->linux_device_name,
ipv4);
++num_output;
}
fprintf(fp, "\n");
/* Free the temp array */
free(eps);
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
}
/************************************************************************/
/*
* qsort helper: compare the procs by job ID and VPID
*/
static int map_compare_procs(const void *aa, const void *bb)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
opal_btl_usnic_proc_t *a = *((opal_btl_usnic_proc_t**) aa);
opal_btl_usnic_proc_t *b = *((opal_btl_usnic_proc_t**) bb);
opal_process_name_t *an = &(a->proc_opal->proc_name);
opal_process_name_t *bn = &(b->proc_opal->proc_name);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
if (an > bn) {
return 1;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
} else if (an < bn) {
return -1;
} else {
return 0;
}
}
/*
* Helper function to output "peer:" lines
*/
static int map_output_procs(FILE *fp)
{
size_t i;
size_t num_procs;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
opal_btl_usnic_proc_t **procs;
opal_btl_usnic_proc_t *pitem;
fprintf(fp, "# Endpoints used to communicate to each peer MPI process:\n");
/* First, we must sort the procs by MCW rank so that they're
always output in a repeatable order. */
num_procs = opal_list_get_size(&mca_btl_usnic_component.usnic_procs);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
procs = calloc(num_procs, sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_proc_t*));
if (NULL == procs) {
return OPAL_ERR_IN_ERRNO;
}
i = 0;
OPAL_LIST_FOREACH(pitem, &mca_btl_usnic_component.usnic_procs,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
opal_btl_usnic_proc_t) {
procs[i] = pitem;
++i;
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
qsort(procs, num_procs, sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_proc_t*),
map_compare_procs);
/* Loop over and print the sorted module device information */
int ret = OPAL_SUCCESS;
for (i = 0; i < num_procs; ++i) {
ompi_proc_t size reduction: part 1 We currently save the hostname of a proc when we create the ompi_proc_t for it. This was originally done because the only method we had for discovering the host of a proc was to include that info in the modex, and we had to therefore store it somewhere proc-local. Obviously, this ccarried a memory penalty for storing all those strings, and so we added a "cutoff" parameter so that we wouldn't collect hostnames above a certain number of procs. Unfortunately, this still results in an 8-byte/proc memory cost as we have a char* pointer in the opal_proc_t that is contained in the ompi_proc_t so that we can store the hostname of the other procs if we fall below the cutoff. At scale, this can consume a fair amount of memory. With the switch to relying on PMIx, there is no longer a need to cache the proc hostnames. Using the "optional" feature of PMIx_Get, we restrict the retrieval to be purely proc-local - i.e., we retrieve the info either via shared memory or from within the proc-internal hash storage (depending upon the active PMIx components). Thus, the retrieval of a hostname is purely a local operation involving no communication. All RM's are required to provide a complete hostname map of all procs at startup. Thus, we have full access to all hostnames without including them in a modex or having to cache them on each proc. This allows us to remove the char* pointer from the opal_proc_t, saving us 8-bytes/proc. Unfortunately, PMIx_Get does not currently support the return of a static pointer to memory. Thus, even though PMIx has the hostname in its memory, it can only return a malloc'd version of it. I have therefore ensured that the return from opal_get_proc_hostname is consistently malloc'd and free'd wherever used. This shouldn't be a burden as the hostname is only used in one of two circumstances: (a) in an error message (b) in a verbose output for debugging purposes Thus, there should be no performance penalty associated with the malloc/free requirement. PMIx will eventually be returning static pointers, and so we can eventually simplify this method and return a "const char*" - but as noted, this really isn't an issue even today. Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain <rhc@pmix.org>
2020-03-22 07:41:54 -07:00
char *errhost = opal_get_proc_hostname(procs[i]->proc_opal);
fprintf(fp, "peer=%d,", procs[i]->proc_opal->proc_name.vpid);
ompi_proc_t size reduction: part 1 We currently save the hostname of a proc when we create the ompi_proc_t for it. This was originally done because the only method we had for discovering the host of a proc was to include that info in the modex, and we had to therefore store it somewhere proc-local. Obviously, this ccarried a memory penalty for storing all those strings, and so we added a "cutoff" parameter so that we wouldn't collect hostnames above a certain number of procs. Unfortunately, this still results in an 8-byte/proc memory cost as we have a char* pointer in the opal_proc_t that is contained in the ompi_proc_t so that we can store the hostname of the other procs if we fall below the cutoff. At scale, this can consume a fair amount of memory. With the switch to relying on PMIx, there is no longer a need to cache the proc hostnames. Using the "optional" feature of PMIx_Get, we restrict the retrieval to be purely proc-local - i.e., we retrieve the info either via shared memory or from within the proc-internal hash storage (depending upon the active PMIx components). Thus, the retrieval of a hostname is purely a local operation involving no communication. All RM's are required to provide a complete hostname map of all procs at startup. Thus, we have full access to all hostnames without including them in a modex or having to cache them on each proc. This allows us to remove the char* pointer from the opal_proc_t, saving us 8-bytes/proc. Unfortunately, PMIx_Get does not currently support the return of a static pointer to memory. Thus, even though PMIx has the hostname in its memory, it can only return a malloc'd version of it. I have therefore ensured that the return from opal_get_proc_hostname is consistently malloc'd and free'd wherever used. This shouldn't be a burden as the hostname is only used in one of two circumstances: (a) in an error message (b) in a verbose output for debugging purposes Thus, there should be no performance penalty associated with the malloc/free requirement. PMIx will eventually be returning static pointers, and so we can eventually simplify this method and return a "const char*" - but as noted, this really isn't an issue even today. Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain <rhc@pmix.org>
2020-03-22 07:41:54 -07:00
fprintf(fp, "hostname=%s,", errhost);
free(errhost);
if (OPAL_SUCCESS != map_output_endpoints(fp, procs[i])) {
break;
}
}
/* Free the temp array */
free(procs);
return ret;
}
/************************************************************************/
/*
* Output the connectivity map
*/
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
void opal_btl_usnic_connectivity_map(void)
{
char *filename;
FILE *fp;
if (NULL == mca_btl_usnic_component.connectivity_map_prefix) {
return;
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
/* Filename is of the form: <prefix>-<hostname>.<pid>.<job>.<MCW
rank>.txt */
opal_asprintf(&filename, "%s-%s.pid%d.job%d.mcwrank%d.txt",
mca_btl_usnic_component.connectivity_map_prefix,
ompi_proc_t size reduction: part 1 We currently save the hostname of a proc when we create the ompi_proc_t for it. This was originally done because the only method we had for discovering the host of a proc was to include that info in the modex, and we had to therefore store it somewhere proc-local. Obviously, this ccarried a memory penalty for storing all those strings, and so we added a "cutoff" parameter so that we wouldn't collect hostnames above a certain number of procs. Unfortunately, this still results in an 8-byte/proc memory cost as we have a char* pointer in the opal_proc_t that is contained in the ompi_proc_t so that we can store the hostname of the other procs if we fall below the cutoff. At scale, this can consume a fair amount of memory. With the switch to relying on PMIx, there is no longer a need to cache the proc hostnames. Using the "optional" feature of PMIx_Get, we restrict the retrieval to be purely proc-local - i.e., we retrieve the info either via shared memory or from within the proc-internal hash storage (depending upon the active PMIx components). Thus, the retrieval of a hostname is purely a local operation involving no communication. All RM's are required to provide a complete hostname map of all procs at startup. Thus, we have full access to all hostnames without including them in a modex or having to cache them on each proc. This allows us to remove the char* pointer from the opal_proc_t, saving us 8-bytes/proc. Unfortunately, PMIx_Get does not currently support the return of a static pointer to memory. Thus, even though PMIx has the hostname in its memory, it can only return a malloc'd version of it. I have therefore ensured that the return from opal_get_proc_hostname is consistently malloc'd and free'd wherever used. This shouldn't be a burden as the hostname is only used in one of two circumstances: (a) in an error message (b) in a verbose output for debugging purposes Thus, there should be no performance penalty associated with the malloc/free requirement. PMIx will eventually be returning static pointers, and so we can eventually simplify this method and return a "const char*" - but as noted, this really isn't an issue even today. Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain <rhc@pmix.org>
2020-03-22 07:41:54 -07:00
opal_process_info.nodename,
getpid(),
opal_proc_local_get()->proc_name.jobid,
opal_proc_local_get()->proc_name.vpid);
if (NULL == filename) {
/* JMS abort? */
return;
}
fp = fopen(filename, "w");
if (NULL == fp) {
char dirname[PATH_MAX];
getcwd(dirname, sizeof(dirname));
dirname[sizeof(dirname) - 1] = '\0';
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt", "cannot write to map file",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
filename,
dirname,
strerror(errno), errno);
return;
}
if (OPAL_SUCCESS == map_output_modules(fp)) {
map_output_procs(fp);
}
fclose(fp);
}