1
1
openmpi/ompi/op/op.c

489 строки
18 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/* -*- Mode: C; c-basic-offset:4 ; indent-tabs-mode:nil -*- */
/*
* Copyright (c) 2004-2006 The Trustees of Indiana University and Indiana
* University Research and Technology
* Corporation. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2004-2010 The University of Tennessee and The University
* of Tennessee Research Foundation. All rights
* reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2004-2007 High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart,
* University of Stuttgart. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Regents of the University of California.
* All rights reserved.
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
* Copyright (c) 2007-2012 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2013 Los Alamos National Security, LLC. All rights
* reserved.
* $COPYRIGHT$
*
* Additional copyrights may follow
*
* $HEADER$
*/
#include "ompi_config.h"
- Split the datatype engine into two parts: an MPI specific part in OMPI and a language agnostic part in OPAL. The convertor is completely moved into OPAL. This offers several benefits as described in RFC http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2009/07/6387.php namely: - Fewer basic types (int* and float* types, boolean and wchar - Fixing naming scheme to ompi-nomenclature. - Usability outside of the ompi-layer. - Due to the fixed nature of simple opal types, their information is completely known at compile time and therefore constified - With fewer datatypes (22), the actual sizes of bit-field types may be reduced from 64 to 32 bits, allowing reorganizing the opal_datatype structure, eliminating holes and keeping data required in convertor (upon send/recv) in one cacheline... This has implications to the convertor-datastructure and other parts of the code. - Several performance tests have been run, the netpipe latency does not change with this patch on Linux/x86-64 on the smoky cluster. - Extensive tests have been done to verify correctness (no new regressions) using: 1. mpi_test_suite on linux/x86-64 using clean ompi-trunk and ompi-ddt: a. running both trunk and ompi-ddt resulted in no differences (except for MPI_SHORT_INT and MPI_TYPE_MIX_LB_UB do now run correctly). b. with --enable-memchecker and running under valgrind (one buglet when run with static found in test-suite, commited) 2. ibm testsuite on linux/x86-64 using clean ompi-trunk and ompi-ddt: all passed (except for the dynamic/ tests failed!! as trunk/MTT) 3. compilation and usage of HDF5 tests on Jaguar using PGI and PathScale compilers. 4. compilation and usage on Scicortex. - Please note, that for the heterogeneous case, (-m32 compiled binaries/ompi), neither ompi-trunk, nor ompi-ddt branch would successfully launch. This commit was SVN r21641.
2009-07-13 08:56:31 +04:00
#include "opal/class/opal_pointer_array.h"
#include "ompi/constants.h"
#include "ompi/op/op.h"
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
#include "ompi/mca/op/base/base.h"
- Split the datatype engine into two parts: an MPI specific part in OMPI and a language agnostic part in OPAL. The convertor is completely moved into OPAL. This offers several benefits as described in RFC http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2009/07/6387.php namely: - Fewer basic types (int* and float* types, boolean and wchar - Fixing naming scheme to ompi-nomenclature. - Usability outside of the ompi-layer. - Due to the fixed nature of simple opal types, their information is completely known at compile time and therefore constified - With fewer datatypes (22), the actual sizes of bit-field types may be reduced from 64 to 32 bits, allowing reorganizing the opal_datatype structure, eliminating holes and keeping data required in convertor (upon send/recv) in one cacheline... This has implications to the convertor-datastructure and other parts of the code. - Several performance tests have been run, the netpipe latency does not change with this patch on Linux/x86-64 on the smoky cluster. - Extensive tests have been done to verify correctness (no new regressions) using: 1. mpi_test_suite on linux/x86-64 using clean ompi-trunk and ompi-ddt: a. running both trunk and ompi-ddt resulted in no differences (except for MPI_SHORT_INT and MPI_TYPE_MIX_LB_UB do now run correctly). b. with --enable-memchecker and running under valgrind (one buglet when run with static found in test-suite, commited) 2. ibm testsuite on linux/x86-64 using clean ompi-trunk and ompi-ddt: all passed (except for the dynamic/ tests failed!! as trunk/MTT) 3. compilation and usage of HDF5 tests on Jaguar using PGI and PathScale compilers. 4. compilation and usage on Scicortex. - Please note, that for the heterogeneous case, (-m32 compiled binaries/ompi), neither ompi-trunk, nor ompi-ddt branch would successfully launch. This commit was SVN r21641.
2009-07-13 08:56:31 +04:00
#include "ompi/datatype/ompi_datatype_internal.h"
/*
* Table for Fortran <-> C op handle conversion
*/
opal_pointer_array_t *ompi_op_f_to_c_table;
/*
* Create intrinsic op
*/
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
static int add_intrinsic(ompi_op_t *op, int fort_handle, int flags,
const char *name);
/*
* Class information
*/
static void ompi_op_construct(ompi_op_t *eh);
static void ompi_op_destruct(ompi_op_t *eh);
/*
* Class instance
*/
OBJ_CLASS_INSTANCE(ompi_op_t, opal_object_t,
ompi_op_construct, ompi_op_destruct);
/*
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
* Intrinsic MPI_Op objects (_addr flavors are for F03 bindings)
*/
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_null;
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_null_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_null;
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_max;
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_max_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_max;
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_min;
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_min_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_min;
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_sum;
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_sum_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_sum;
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_prod;
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_prod_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_prod;
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_land;
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_land_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_land;
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_band;
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_band_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_band;
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_lor;
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_lor_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_lor;
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_bor;
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_bor_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_bor;
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_lxor;
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_lxor_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_lxor;
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_bxor;
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_bxor_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_bxor;
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_maxloc;
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_maxloc_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_maxloc;
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_minloc;
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_minloc_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_minloc;
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_replace;
== Highlights == 1. New mpifort wrapper compiler: you can utilize mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08 through this one wrapper compiler 1. mpif77 and mpif90 still exist, but are sym links to mpifort and may be removed in a future release 1. The mpi module has been re-implemented and is significantly "mo' bettah" 1. The mpi_f08 module offers many, many improvements over mpif.h and the mpi module This stuff is coming from a VERY long-lived mercurial branch (3 years!); it'll almost certainly take a few SVN commits and a bunch of testing before I get it correctly committed to the SVN trunk. == More details == Craig Rasmussen and I have been working with the MPI-3 Fortran WG and Fortran J3 committees for a long, long time to make a prototype MPI-3 Fortran bindings implementation. We think we're at a stable enough state to bring this stuff back to the trunk, with the goal of including it in OMPI v1.7. Special thanks go out to everyone who has been incredibly patient and helpful to us in this journey: * Rolf Rabenseifner/HLRS (mastermind/genius behind the entire MPI-3 Fortran effort) * The Fortran J3 committee * Tobias Burnus/gfortran * Tony !Goetz/Absoft * Terry !Donte/Oracle * ...and probably others whom I'm forgetting :-( There's still opportunities for optimization in the mpi_f08 implementation, but by and large, it is as far along as it can be until Fortran compilers start implementing the new F08 dimension(..) syntax. Note that gfortran is currently unsupported for the mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module. gfortran users will a) fall back to the same mpi module implementation that is in OMPI v1.5.x, and b) not get the new mpi_f08 module. The gfortran maintainers are actively working hard to add the necessary features to support both the new mpi_f08 module and the new mpi module implementations. This will take some time. As mentioned above, ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90 no longer exist. All the fortran bindings implementations have been collated under ompi/mpi/fortran; each implementation has its own subdirectory: {{{ ompi/mpi/fortran/ base/ - glue code mpif-h/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f77 use-mpi-tkr/ - what used to be ompi/mpi/f90 use-mpi-ignore-tkr/ - new mpi module implementation use-mpi-f08/ - new mpi_f08 module implementation }}} There's also a prototype 6-function-MPI implementation under use-mpi-f08-desc that emulates the new F08 dimension(..) syntax that isn't fully available in Fortran compilers yet. We did that to prove it to ourselves that it could be done once the compilers fully support it. This directory/implementation will likely eventually replace the use-mpi-f08 version. Other things that were done: * ompi_info grew a few new output fields to describe what level of Fortran support is included * Existing Fortran examples in examples/ were renamed; new mpi_f08 examples were added * The old Fortran MPI libraries were renamed: * libmpi_f77 -> libmpi_mpifh * libmpi_f90 -> libmpi_usempi * The configury for Fortran was consolidated and significantly slimmed down. Note that the F77 env variable is now IGNORED for configure; you should only use FC. Example: {{{ shell$ ./configure CC=icc CXX=icpc FC=ifort ... }}} All of this work was done in a Mercurial branch off the SVN trunk, and hosted at Bitbucket. This branch has got to be one of OMPI's longest-running branches. Its first commit was Tue Apr 07 23:01:46 2009 -0400 -- it's over 3 years old! :-) We think we've pulled in all relevant changes from the OMPI trunk (e.g., Fortran implementations of the new MPI-3 MPROBE stuff for mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08, and the recent Fujitsu Fortran patches). I anticipate some instability when we bring this stuff into the trunk, simply because it touches a LOT of code in the MPI layer in the OMPI code base. We'll try our best to make it as pain-free as possible, but please bear with us when it is committed. This commit was SVN r26283.
2012-04-18 19:57:29 +04:00
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_replace_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_replace;
ompi_predefined_op_t ompi_mpi_op_no_op;
ompi_predefined_op_t *ompi_mpi_op_no_op_addr = &ompi_mpi_op_no_op;
/*
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
* Map from ddt->id to position in op function pointer array
*/
- Split the datatype engine into two parts: an MPI specific part in OMPI and a language agnostic part in OPAL. The convertor is completely moved into OPAL. This offers several benefits as described in RFC http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2009/07/6387.php namely: - Fewer basic types (int* and float* types, boolean and wchar - Fixing naming scheme to ompi-nomenclature. - Usability outside of the ompi-layer. - Due to the fixed nature of simple opal types, their information is completely known at compile time and therefore constified - With fewer datatypes (22), the actual sizes of bit-field types may be reduced from 64 to 32 bits, allowing reorganizing the opal_datatype structure, eliminating holes and keeping data required in convertor (upon send/recv) in one cacheline... This has implications to the convertor-datastructure and other parts of the code. - Several performance tests have been run, the netpipe latency does not change with this patch on Linux/x86-64 on the smoky cluster. - Extensive tests have been done to verify correctness (no new regressions) using: 1. mpi_test_suite on linux/x86-64 using clean ompi-trunk and ompi-ddt: a. running both trunk and ompi-ddt resulted in no differences (except for MPI_SHORT_INT and MPI_TYPE_MIX_LB_UB do now run correctly). b. with --enable-memchecker and running under valgrind (one buglet when run with static found in test-suite, commited) 2. ibm testsuite on linux/x86-64 using clean ompi-trunk and ompi-ddt: all passed (except for the dynamic/ tests failed!! as trunk/MTT) 3. compilation and usage of HDF5 tests on Jaguar using PGI and PathScale compilers. 4. compilation and usage on Scicortex. - Please note, that for the heterogeneous case, (-m32 compiled binaries/ompi), neither ompi-trunk, nor ompi-ddt branch would successfully launch. This commit was SVN r21641.
2009-07-13 08:56:31 +04:00
int ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MAX_PREDEFINED];
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
/* Get the c complex operator associated with a fortran complex type */
#define FORTRAN_COMPLEX_OP_TYPE_X(type) OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_ ## type
/* Preprocessor hack to ensure type gets expanded correctly */
#define FORTRAN_COMPLEX_OP_TYPE(type) FORTRAN_COMPLEX_OP_TYPE_X(type)
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
#define FLAGS_NO_FLOAT \
(OMPI_OP_FLAGS_INTRINSIC | OMPI_OP_FLAGS_ASSOC | OMPI_OP_FLAGS_COMMUTE)
#define FLAGS \
(OMPI_OP_FLAGS_INTRINSIC | OMPI_OP_FLAGS_ASSOC | \
OMPI_OP_FLAGS_FLOAT_ASSOC | OMPI_OP_FLAGS_COMMUTE)
/*
* Initialize OMPI op infrastructure
*/
int ompi_op_init(void)
{
int i;
/* initialize ompi_op_f_to_c_table */
ompi_op_f_to_c_table = OBJ_NEW(opal_pointer_array_t);
if (NULL == ompi_op_f_to_c_table){
return OMPI_ERROR;
}
/* Fill in the ddt.id->op_position map */
- Split the datatype engine into two parts: an MPI specific part in OMPI and a language agnostic part in OPAL. The convertor is completely moved into OPAL. This offers several benefits as described in RFC http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2009/07/6387.php namely: - Fewer basic types (int* and float* types, boolean and wchar - Fixing naming scheme to ompi-nomenclature. - Usability outside of the ompi-layer. - Due to the fixed nature of simple opal types, their information is completely known at compile time and therefore constified - With fewer datatypes (22), the actual sizes of bit-field types may be reduced from 64 to 32 bits, allowing reorganizing the opal_datatype structure, eliminating holes and keeping data required in convertor (upon send/recv) in one cacheline... This has implications to the convertor-datastructure and other parts of the code. - Several performance tests have been run, the netpipe latency does not change with this patch on Linux/x86-64 on the smoky cluster. - Extensive tests have been done to verify correctness (no new regressions) using: 1. mpi_test_suite on linux/x86-64 using clean ompi-trunk and ompi-ddt: a. running both trunk and ompi-ddt resulted in no differences (except for MPI_SHORT_INT and MPI_TYPE_MIX_LB_UB do now run correctly). b. with --enable-memchecker and running under valgrind (one buglet when run with static found in test-suite, commited) 2. ibm testsuite on linux/x86-64 using clean ompi-trunk and ompi-ddt: all passed (except for the dynamic/ tests failed!! as trunk/MTT) 3. compilation and usage of HDF5 tests on Jaguar using PGI and PathScale compilers. 4. compilation and usage on Scicortex. - Please note, that for the heterogeneous case, (-m32 compiled binaries/ompi), neither ompi-trunk, nor ompi-ddt branch would successfully launch. This commit was SVN r21641.
2009-07-13 08:56:31 +04:00
for (i = 0; i < OMPI_DATATYPE_MAX_PREDEFINED; ++i) {
ompi_op_ddt_map[i] = -1;
}
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_INT8_T] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_INT8_T;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_UINT8_T] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_UINT8_T;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_INT16_T] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_INT16_T;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_UINT16_T] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_UINT16_T;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_INT32_T] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_INT32_T;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_UINT32_T] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_UINT32_T;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_INT64_T] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_INT64_T;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_UINT64_T] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_UINT64_T;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_FLOAT] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_FLOAT;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_DOUBLE] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_DOUBLE;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_LONG_DOUBLE] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_LONG_DOUBLE;
#if OMPI_HAVE_FORTRAN_COMPLEX8
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_COMPLEX8] = FORTRAN_COMPLEX_OP_TYPE(OMPI_KIND_FORTRAN_COMPLEX8);
#endif
#if OMPI_HAVE_FORTRAN_COMPLEX16
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_COMPLEX16] = FORTRAN_COMPLEX_OP_TYPE(OMPI_KIND_FORTRAN_COMPLEX16);
#endif
/* Only enable reductions on COMPLEX32 if the REAL*16 matches the equivalent C type */
#if OMPI_REAL16_MATCHES_C && OMPI_HAVE_FORTRAN_COMPLEX32
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_COMPLEX32] = FORTRAN_COMPLEX_OP_TYPE(OMPI_KIND_FORTRAN_COMPLEX32);
#endif
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_WCHAR] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_WCHAR;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_BOOL] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_BOOL;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_LOGICAL] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_LOGICAL;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_CHARACTER] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_UINT8_T;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_INTEGER] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_INTEGER;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_REAL] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_REAL;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_DOUBLE_PRECISION] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_DOUBLE_PRECISION;
#if OMPI_HAVE_FORTRAN_COMPLEX
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_COMPLEX] = FORTRAN_COMPLEX_OP_TYPE(OMPI_KIND_FORTRAN_COMPLEX);
#endif
#if OMPI_HAVE_FORTRAN_DOUBLE_COMPLEX
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_DOUBLE_COMPLEX] = FORTRAN_COMPLEX_OP_TYPE(OMPI_KIND_FORTRAN_DOUBLE_COMPLEX);
#endif
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_LONG_DOUBLE_COMPLEX] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_C_LONG_DOUBLE_COMPLEX;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_2INT] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_2INT;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_2INTEGER] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_2INTEGER;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_2REAL] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_2REAL;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_2DBLPREC] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_2DOUBLE_PRECISION;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_2COMPLEX] = -1; /* Not defined */
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_2DOUBLE_COMPLEX] = -1; /* Not defined */
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_FLOAT_INT] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_FLOAT_INT;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_DOUBLE_INT] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_DOUBLE_INT;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_LONG_DOUBLE_INT] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_LONG_DOUBLE_INT;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_LONG_INT] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_LONG_INT;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_SHORT_INT] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_SHORT_INT;
#if SIZEOF_PTRDIFF_T == 4
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_AINT] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_INT32_T;
#elif SIZEOF_PTRDIFF_T == 8
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_AINT] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_INT64_T;
#else
#warning Unsupported definition for MPI_AINT
#endif
#if OMPI_MPI_OFFSET_SIZE == 4
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_OFFSET] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_UINT32_T;
#elif OMPI_MPI_OFFSET_SIZE == 8
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_OFFSET] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_UINT64_T;
#else
#warning Unsupported definition for MPI_OFFSET
#endif
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_C_BOOL] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_BOOL;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_C_COMPLEX] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_C_FLOAT_COMPLEX;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_C_FLOAT_COMPLEX] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_C_FLOAT_COMPLEX;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_C_DOUBLE_COMPLEX] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_C_DOUBLE_COMPLEX;
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_C_LONG_DOUBLE_COMPLEX] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_C_LONG_DOUBLE_COMPLEX;
/* MPI 3.0 datatypes */
#if OMPI_MPI_COUNT_SIZE == 4
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_COUNT] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_INT32_T;
#elif OMPI_MPI_COUNT_SIZE == 8
ompi_op_ddt_map[OMPI_DATATYPE_MPI_COUNT] = OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_INT64_T;
#else
#warning Unsupported definition for MPI_COUNT
#endif
/* Create the intrinsic ops */
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
if (OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_null.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_NULL,
FLAGS, "MPI_NULL") ||
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_max.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_MAX,
FLAGS, "MPI_MAX") ||
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_min.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_MIN,
FLAGS, "MPI_MIN") ||
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_sum.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_SUM,
FLAGS_NO_FLOAT, "MPI_SUM") ||
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_prod.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_PROD,
FLAGS_NO_FLOAT, "MPI_PROD") ||
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_land.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_LAND,
FLAGS, "MPI_LAND") ||
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_band.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_BAND,
FLAGS, "MPI_BAND") ||
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_lor.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_LOR,
FLAGS, "MPI_LOR") ||
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_bor.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_BOR,
FLAGS, "MPI_BOR") ||
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_lxor.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_LXOR,
FLAGS, "MPI_LXOR") ||
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_bxor.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_BXOR,
FLAGS, "MPI_BXOR") ||
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_maxloc.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_MAXLOC,
FLAGS, "MPI_MAXLOC") ||
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_minloc.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_MINLOC,
FLAGS, "MPI_MINLOC") ||
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_replace.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_REPLACE,
FLAGS, "MPI_REPLACE") ||
OMPI_SUCCESS !=
add_intrinsic(&ompi_mpi_op_no_op.op, OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_NO_OP,
FLAGS, "MPI_NO_OP")) {
return OMPI_ERROR;
coll/ml: add support for blocking and non-blocking allreduce, reduce, and allgather. The new collectives provide a signifigant performance increase over tuned for small and medium messages. We are initially setting the priority lower than tuned until this has had some time to soak in the trunk. Please set coll_ml_priority to 90 for MTT runs. Credit for this work goes to Manjunath Gorentla Venkata (ORNL), Pavel Shamis (ORNL), and Nathan Hjelm (LANL). Commit details (for reference): Import ORNL's collectives for MPI_Allreduce, MPI_Reduce, and MPI_Allgather. We need to take the basesmuma header into account when calculating the ptpcoll small message thresholds. Add a define to bcol.h indicating the maximum header size so we can take the header into account while not making ptpcoll dependent on information from basesmuma. This resolves an issue with allreduce where ptpcoll overwrites the header of the next buffer in the basesmuma bank. Fix reduce and make a sequential collective launcher in coll_ml_inlines.h The root calculation for reduce was wrong for any root != 0. There are four possibilities for the root: - The root is not the current process but is in the current hierarchy. In this case the root is the index of the global root as specified in the root vector. - The root is not the current process and is not in the next level of the hierarchy. In this case 0 must be the local root since this process will never communicate with the real root. - The root is not the current process but will be in next level of the hierarchy. In this case the current process must be the root. - I am the root. The root is my index. Tested with IMB which rotates the root on every call to MPI_Reduce. Consider IMB the reproducer for the issue this commit solves. Make the bcast algorithm decision an enumerated variable Resolve various asset failures when destructing coll ml requests. Two issues: - Always reset the request to be invalid before returning it to the free list. This will avoid an asset in ompi_request_t's destructor. OMPI_REQUEST_FINI does this (and also releases the fortran handle index). - Never explicitly construct or destruct the superclass of an opal object. This screws up the class function tables and will cause either an assert failure or a segmentation fault when destructing coll ml requests. Cleanup allgather. I removed the duplicate non-blocking and blocking functions and modeled the cleanup after what I found in allreduce. Also cleaned up the code somewhat. Don't bother copying from the send to the recieve buffer in bcol_basesmuma_allreduce_intra_fanin_fanout if the pointers are the same. The eliminates a warning about memcpy and aliasing and avoids an unnecessary call to memcpy. Alwasy call CHECK_AND_RELEASE on memsync collectives. There was a call to OBJ_RELEASE on the collective communicator but because CHECK_AND_RECYLCE was never called there was not matching call to OBJ_RELEASE. This caused coll ml to leak communicators. Make allreduce use the sequential collective launcher in coll_ml_inlines.h Just launch the next collective in the component progress. I am a little unsure about this patch. There appears to be some sort of race between collectives that causes buffer exhaustion in some cases (IMB Allreduce is a reproducer). Changing progress to only launch the next bcol seems to resolve the issue but might not be the best fix. Note that I see little-no performance penalty for this change. Fix allreduce when there are extra sources. There was an issue with the buffer offset calculation when there are extra sources. In the case of extra sources == 1 the offset was set to buffer_size (just past the header of the next buffer). I adjusted the buffer size to take into accoun the maximum header size (see the earlier commit that added this) and simplified the offset calculation. Make reduce/allreduce non-blocking. This is required for MPI_Comm_idup to work correctly. This has been tested with various layouts using the ibm testsuite and imb and appears to have the same performance as the old blocking version. Fix allgather for non-contiguous layouts and simplify parsing the topology. Some things in this patch: - There were several comments to the effect that level 0 of the hierarchy MUST contain all of the ranks. At least one function made this assumption but it was not true. I changed the sbgp components and the coll ml initization code to enforce this requirement. - Ensure that hierarchy level 0 has the ranks in the correct scatter gather order. This removes the need for a separate sort list and fixes the offset calculation for allgather. - There were several passes over the hierarchy to determine properties of the hierarchy. I eliminated these extra passes and the memory allocation associated with them and calculate the tree properties on the fly. The same DFS recursion also handles the re-order of level 0. All these changes have been verified with MPI_Allreduce, MPI_Reduce, and MPI_Allgather. All functions now pass all IBM/Open MPI, and IMB tests. coll/ml: correct pointer usage for MPI_BOTTOM Since contiguous datatypes are copied via memcpy (bypassing the convertor) we need to adjust for the lb of the datatype. This corrects problems found testing code that uses MPI_BOTTOM (NULL) as the send pointer. Add fallback collectives for allreduce and reduce. cmr=v1.7.5:reviewer=pasha This commit was SVN r30363.
2014-01-22 19:39:19 +04:00
}else{
/* This code is placed back here to support
* HCOL allreduce at the moment. It is a part of bgate repository only. This conflict with OMPI v1.7
* is to be resolved some other way.
* */
ompi_mpi_op_null.op.op_type = OMPI_OP_NULL;
ompi_mpi_op_max.op.op_type = OMPI_OP_MAX;
ompi_mpi_op_min.op.op_type = OMPI_OP_MIN;
ompi_mpi_op_sum.op.op_type = OMPI_OP_SUM;
ompi_mpi_op_prod.op.op_type = OMPI_OP_PROD;
ompi_mpi_op_land.op.op_type = OMPI_OP_LAND;
ompi_mpi_op_band.op.op_type = OMPI_OP_BAND;
ompi_mpi_op_lor.op.op_type = OMPI_OP_LOR;
ompi_mpi_op_bor.op.op_type = OMPI_OP_BOR;
ompi_mpi_op_lxor.op.op_type = OMPI_OP_LXOR;
ompi_mpi_op_bxor.op.op_type = OMPI_OP_BXOR;
ompi_mpi_op_maxloc.op.op_type = OMPI_OP_MAXLOC;
ompi_mpi_op_minloc.op.op_type = OMPI_OP_MINLOC;
ompi_mpi_op_replace.op.op_type = OMPI_OP_REPLACE;
}
/* All done */
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
}
/*
* Clean up the op resources
*/
int ompi_op_finalize(void)
{
/* clean up the intrinsic ops */
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_no_op);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_replace);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_minloc);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_maxloc);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_bxor);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_lxor);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_bor);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_lor);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_band);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_land);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_prod);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_sum);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_min);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_max);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&ompi_mpi_op_null);
/* Remove op F2C table */
OBJ_RELEASE(ompi_op_f_to_c_table);
/* All done */
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
}
/*
* Create a new MPI_Op
*/
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
ompi_op_t *ompi_op_create_user(bool commute,
ompi_op_fortran_handler_fn_t func)
{
ompi_op_t *new_op;
/* Create a new object and ensure that it's valid */
new_op = OBJ_NEW(ompi_op_t);
if (NULL == new_op) {
goto error;
}
if (0 > new_op->o_f_to_c_index) {
OBJ_RELEASE(new_op);
new_op = NULL;
goto error;
}
/*
* The new object is valid -- initialize it. If this is being
* created from fortran, the fortran MPI API wrapper function
* will override the o_flags field directly. We cast the
* function pointer type to the fortran type arbitrarily -- it
* only has to be a function pointer in order to store properly,
* it doesn't matter what type it is (we'll cast it to the Right
* type when we *use* it).
*/
new_op->o_flags = OMPI_OP_FLAGS_ASSOC;
if (commute) {
new_op->o_flags |= OMPI_OP_FLAGS_COMMUTE;
}
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
/* Set the user-defined callback function. The "fort_fn" member
is part of a union, so it doesn't matter if this is a C or
Fortan callback; we'll call the right flavor (per o_flags) at
invocation time. */
new_op->o_func.fort_fn = func;
error:
/* All done */
return new_op;
}
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
/*
* See lengthy comment in mpi/cxx/intercepts.cc for how the C++ MPI::Op
* callbacks work.
*/
void ompi_op_set_cxx_callback(ompi_op_t *op, MPI_User_function *fn)
{
op->o_flags |= OMPI_OP_FLAGS_CXX_FUNC;
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
/* The OMPI C++ intercept was previously stored in
op->o_func.fort_fn by ompi_op_create_user(). So save that in
cxx.intercept_fn and put the user's fn in cxx.user_fn. */
op->o_func.cxx_data.intercept_fn =
(ompi_op_cxx_handler_fn_t *) op->o_func.fort_fn;
op->o_func.cxx_data.user_fn = fn;
}
/*
* See lengthy comment in mpi/cxx/intercepts.cc for how the C++ MPI::Op
* callbacks work.
*/
void ompi_op_set_java_callback(ompi_op_t *op, void *jnienv,
void *object, int baseType)
{
op->o_flags |= OMPI_OP_FLAGS_JAVA_FUNC;
/* The OMPI Java intercept was previously stored in
op->o_func.fort_fn by ompi_op_create_user(). So save that in
cxx.intercept_fn and put the user's fn in cxx.user_fn. */
op->o_func.java_data.intercept_fn =
(ompi_op_java_handler_fn_t *) op->o_func.fort_fn;
op->o_func.java_data.jnienv = jnienv;
op->o_func.java_data.object = object;
op->o_func.java_data.baseType = baseType;
}
/**************************************************************************
*
* Static functions
*
**************************************************************************/
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
static int add_intrinsic(ompi_op_t *op, int fort_handle, int flags,
const char *name)
{
/* Add the op to the table */
OBJ_CONSTRUCT(op, ompi_op_t);
if (op->o_f_to_c_index != fort_handle) {
return OMPI_ERROR;
}
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
/* Set the members */
op->o_flags = flags;
strncpy(op->o_name, name, sizeof(op->o_name) - 1);
op->o_name[sizeof(op->o_name) - 1] = '\0';
/* Perform the selection on this op to fill in the function
pointers (except for NULL and REPLACE, which don't get
components) */
if (OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_NULL != op->o_f_to_c_index &&
OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_REPLACE != op->o_f_to_c_index &&
OMPI_OP_BASE_FORTRAN_NO_OP != op->o_f_to_c_index) {
Two major things in this commit: * New "op" MPI layer framework * Addition of the MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL proposed function (for MPI-2.2) = Op framework = Add new "op" framework in the ompi layer. This framework replaces the hard-coded MPI_Op back-end functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples for pre-defined MPI_Ops, allowing components and modules to provide the back-end functions. The intent is that components can be written to take advantage of hardware acceleration (GPU, FPGA, specialized CPU instructions, etc.). Similar to other frameworks, components are intended to be able to discover at run-time if they can be used, and if so, elect themselves to be selected (or disqualify themselves from selection if they cannot run). If specialized hardware is not available, there is a default set of functions that will automatically be used. This framework is ''not'' used for user-defined MPI_Ops. The new op framework is similar to the existing coll framework, in that the final set of function pointers that are used on any given intrinsic MPI_Op can be a mixed bag of function pointers, potentially coming from multiple different op modules. This allows for hardware that only supports some of the operations, not all of them (e.g., a GPU that only supports single-precision operations). All the hard-coded back-end MPI_Op functions for (MPI_Op, MPI_Datatype) tuples still exist, but unlike coll, they're in the framework base (vs. being in a separate "basic" component) and are automatically used if no component is found at runtime that provides a module with the necessary function pointers. There is an "example" op component that will hopefully be useful to those writing meaningful op components. It is currently .ompi_ignore'd so that it doesn't impinge on other developers (it's somewhat chatty in terms of opal_output() so that you can tell when its functions have been invoked). See the README file in the example op component directory. Developers of new op components are encouraged to look at the following wiki pages: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/Autogen https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateFramework = MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL = Part of the MPI-2.2 proposal listed here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/24 is to add a new function named MPI_REDUCE_LOCAL. It is very easy to implement, so I added it (also because it makes testing the op framework pretty easy -- you can do it in serial rather than via parallel reductions). There's even a man page! This commit was SVN r20280.
2009-01-15 02:44:31 +03:00
return ompi_op_base_op_select(op);
} else {
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
}
}
/*
* Op constructor
*/
static void ompi_op_construct(ompi_op_t *new_op)
{
int i;
/* assign entry in fortran <-> c translation array */
new_op->o_f_to_c_index =
opal_pointer_array_add(ompi_op_f_to_c_table, new_op);
/* Set everything to NULL so that we can intelligently free
non-NULL's in the destructor */
for (i = 0; i < OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_MAX; ++i) {
new_op->o_func.intrinsic.fns[i] = NULL;
new_op->o_func.intrinsic.modules[i] = NULL;
new_op->o_3buff_intrinsic.fns[i] = NULL;
new_op->o_3buff_intrinsic.modules[i] = NULL;
}
}
/*
* Op destructor
*/
static void ompi_op_destruct(ompi_op_t *op)
{
int i;
/* reset the ompi_op_f_to_c_table entry - make sure that the
entry is in the table */
if (NULL != opal_pointer_array_get_item(ompi_op_f_to_c_table,
op->o_f_to_c_index)) {
opal_pointer_array_set_item(ompi_op_f_to_c_table,
op->o_f_to_c_index, NULL);
}
for (i = 0; i < OMPI_OP_BASE_TYPE_MAX; ++i) {
op->o_func.intrinsic.fns[i] = NULL;
if( NULL != op->o_func.intrinsic.modules[i] ) {
OBJ_RELEASE(op->o_func.intrinsic.modules[i]);
op->o_func.intrinsic.modules[i] = NULL;
}
op->o_3buff_intrinsic.fns[i] = NULL;
if( NULL != op->o_3buff_intrinsic.modules[i] ) {
OBJ_RELEASE(op->o_3buff_intrinsic.modules[i]);
op->o_3buff_intrinsic.modules[i] = NULL;
}
}
}