1
1
openmpi/ompi/mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c

566 строки
18 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/* -*- Mode: C; c-basic-offset:4 ; indent-tabs-mode:nil -*- */
/*
* Copyright (c) 2012 Sandia National Laboratories. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2014-2015 Los Alamos National Security, LLC. All rights
* reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2014 Intel, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2015 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2015-2017 Research Organization for Information Science
* and Technology (RIST). All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2017 The University of Tennessee and The University
* of Tennessee Research Foundation. All rights
* reserved.
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
* Copyright (c) 2016 IBM Corp. All rights reserved.
* $COPYRIGHT$
*
* Additional copyrights may follow
*
* $HEADER$
*/
#include "ompi_config.h"
#include "ompi/mca/osc/osc.h"
#include "ompi/mca/osc/base/base.h"
#include "ompi/mca/osc/base/osc_base_obj_convert.h"
#include "ompi/request/request.h"
#include "opal/util/sys_limits.h"
#include "opal/include/opal/align.h"
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
#include "opal/util/info_subscriber.h"
#include "osc_sm.h"
static int component_open(void);
static int component_init(bool enable_progress_threads, bool enable_mpi_threads);
static int component_finalize(void);
static int component_query(struct ompi_win_t *win, void **base, size_t size, int disp_unit,
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
struct ompi_communicator_t *comm, struct opal_info_t *info,
int flavor);
static int component_select(struct ompi_win_t *win, void **base, size_t size, int disp_unit,
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
struct ompi_communicator_t *comm, struct opal_info_t *info,
int flavor, int *model);
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
static char* component_set_blocking_fence_info(void *obj, char *key, char *val);
static char* component_set_alloc_shared_noncontig_info(void *obj, char *key, char *val);
ompi_osc_sm_component_t mca_osc_sm_component = {
{ /* ompi_osc_base_component_t */
.osc_version = {
OMPI_OSC_BASE_VERSION_3_0_0,
.mca_component_name = "sm",
MCA_BASE_MAKE_VERSION(component, OMPI_MAJOR_VERSION, OMPI_MINOR_VERSION,
OMPI_RELEASE_VERSION),
.mca_open_component = component_open,
},
.osc_data = { /* mca_base_component_data */
/* The component is not checkpoint ready */
MCA_BASE_METADATA_PARAM_NONE
},
.osc_init = component_init,
.osc_query = component_query,
.osc_select = component_select,
.osc_finalize = component_finalize,
}
};
ompi_osc_sm_module_t ompi_osc_sm_module_template = {
{
.osc_win_shared_query = ompi_osc_sm_shared_query,
.osc_win_attach = ompi_osc_sm_attach,
.osc_win_detach = ompi_osc_sm_detach,
.osc_free = ompi_osc_sm_free,
.osc_put = ompi_osc_sm_put,
.osc_get = ompi_osc_sm_get,
.osc_accumulate = ompi_osc_sm_accumulate,
.osc_compare_and_swap = ompi_osc_sm_compare_and_swap,
.osc_fetch_and_op = ompi_osc_sm_fetch_and_op,
.osc_get_accumulate = ompi_osc_sm_get_accumulate,
.osc_rput = ompi_osc_sm_rput,
.osc_rget = ompi_osc_sm_rget,
.osc_raccumulate = ompi_osc_sm_raccumulate,
.osc_rget_accumulate = ompi_osc_sm_rget_accumulate,
.osc_fence = ompi_osc_sm_fence,
.osc_start = ompi_osc_sm_start,
.osc_complete = ompi_osc_sm_complete,
.osc_post = ompi_osc_sm_post,
.osc_wait = ompi_osc_sm_wait,
.osc_test = ompi_osc_sm_test,
.osc_lock = ompi_osc_sm_lock,
.osc_unlock = ompi_osc_sm_unlock,
.osc_lock_all = ompi_osc_sm_lock_all,
.osc_unlock_all = ompi_osc_sm_unlock_all,
.osc_sync = ompi_osc_sm_sync,
.osc_flush = ompi_osc_sm_flush,
.osc_flush_all = ompi_osc_sm_flush_all,
.osc_flush_local = ompi_osc_sm_flush_local,
.osc_flush_local_all = ompi_osc_sm_flush_local_all,
}
};
static int
component_open(void)
{
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
}
static int
component_init(bool enable_progress_threads, bool enable_mpi_threads)
{
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
}
static int
component_finalize(void)
{
/* clean up requests free list */
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
}
static int
check_win_ok(ompi_communicator_t *comm, int flavor)
{
if (! (MPI_WIN_FLAVOR_SHARED == flavor
|| MPI_WIN_FLAVOR_ALLOCATE == flavor) ) {
return OMPI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
}
if (ompi_group_have_remote_peers (comm->c_local_group)) {
return OMPI_ERR_RMA_SHARED;
}
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
}
static int
component_query(struct ompi_win_t *win, void **base, size_t size, int disp_unit,
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
struct ompi_communicator_t *comm, struct opal_info_t *info,
int flavor)
{
int ret;
if (OMPI_SUCCESS != (ret = check_win_ok(comm, flavor))) {
if (OMPI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED == ret) {
return -1;
}
return ret;
}
return 100;
}
static int
component_select(struct ompi_win_t *win, void **base, size_t size, int disp_unit,
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
struct ompi_communicator_t *comm, struct opal_info_t *info,
int flavor, int *model)
{
ompi_osc_sm_module_t *module = NULL;
int comm_size = ompi_comm_size (comm);
int ret = OMPI_ERROR;
if (OMPI_SUCCESS != (ret = check_win_ok(comm, flavor))) {
return ret;
}
/* create module structure */
module = (ompi_osc_sm_module_t*)
calloc(1, sizeof(ompi_osc_sm_module_t));
if (NULL == module) return OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
OBJ_CONSTRUCT(&module->lock, opal_mutex_t);
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
ret = opal_infosubscribe_subscribe(win, "blocking_fence", "false",
component_set_blocking_fence_info);
module->global_state->use_barrier_for_fence = 1;
if (OPAL_SUCCESS != ret) goto error;
ret = opal_infosubscribe_subscribe(win, "alloc_shared_contig", "false", component_set_alloc_shared_noncontig_info);
if (OPAL_SUCCESS != ret) goto error;
/* fill in the function pointer part */
memcpy(module, &ompi_osc_sm_module_template,
sizeof(ompi_osc_base_module_t));
/* need our communicator for collectives in next phase */
ret = ompi_comm_dup(comm, &module->comm);
if (OMPI_SUCCESS != ret) goto error;
module->flavor = flavor;
/* create the segment */
if (1 == comm_size) {
module->segment_base = NULL;
module->sizes = malloc(sizeof(size_t));
if (NULL == module->sizes) return OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
module->bases = malloc(sizeof(void*));
if (NULL == module->bases) return OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
module->sizes[0] = size;
module->bases[0] = malloc(size);
if (NULL == module->bases[0]) return OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
module->global_state = malloc(sizeof(ompi_osc_sm_global_state_t));
if (NULL == module->global_state) return OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
module->node_states = malloc(sizeof(ompi_osc_sm_node_state_t));
if (NULL == module->node_states) return OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
module->posts = calloc (1, sizeof(module->posts[0]) + sizeof (uint64_t));
if (NULL == module->posts) return OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
module->posts[0] = (uint64_t *) (module->posts + 1);
} else {
unsigned long total, *rbuf;
int i, flag;
size_t pagesize;
size_t state_size;
size_t posts_size, post_size = (comm_size + 63) / 64;
OPAL_OUTPUT_VERBOSE((1, ompi_osc_base_framework.framework_output,
"allocating shared memory region of size %ld\n", (long) size));
/* get the pagesize */
pagesize = opal_getpagesize();
rbuf = malloc(sizeof(unsigned long) * comm_size);
if (NULL == rbuf) return OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
module->noncontig = false;
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
if (OMPI_SUCCESS != opal_info_get_bool(info, "alloc_shared_noncontig",
&module->noncontig, &flag)) {
goto error;
}
if (module->noncontig) {
total = ((size - 1) / pagesize + 1) * pagesize;
} else {
total = size;
}
ret = module->comm->c_coll->coll_allgather(&total, 1, MPI_UNSIGNED_LONG,
rbuf, 1, MPI_UNSIGNED_LONG,
module->comm,
module->comm->c_coll->coll_allgather_module);
if (OMPI_SUCCESS != ret) return ret;
total = 0;
for (i = 0 ; i < comm_size ; ++i) {
total += rbuf[i];
}
/* user opal/shmem directly to create a shared memory segment */
state_size = sizeof(ompi_osc_sm_global_state_t) + sizeof(ompi_osc_sm_node_state_t) * comm_size;
state_size += OPAL_ALIGN_PAD_AMOUNT(state_size, 64);
posts_size = comm_size * post_size * sizeof (uint64_t);
posts_size += OPAL_ALIGN_PAD_AMOUNT(posts_size, 64);
if (0 == ompi_comm_rank (module->comm)) {
char *data_file;
if (asprintf(&data_file, "%s"OPAL_PATH_SEP"shared_window_%d.%s",
ompi_process_info.proc_session_dir,
ompi_comm_get_cid(module->comm),
ompi_process_info.nodename) < 0) {
return OMPI_ERR_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
}
ret = opal_shmem_segment_create (&module->seg_ds, data_file, total + pagesize + state_size + posts_size);
free(data_file);
if (OPAL_SUCCESS != ret) {
goto error;
}
}
ret = module->comm->c_coll->coll_bcast (&module->seg_ds, sizeof (module->seg_ds), MPI_BYTE, 0,
module->comm, module->comm->c_coll->coll_bcast_module);
if (OMPI_SUCCESS != ret) {
goto error;
}
module->segment_base = opal_shmem_segment_attach (&module->seg_ds);
if (NULL == module->segment_base) {
goto error;
}
module->sizes = malloc(sizeof(size_t) * comm_size);
if (NULL == module->sizes) return OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
module->bases = malloc(sizeof(void*) * comm_size);
if (NULL == module->bases) return OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
module->posts = calloc (comm_size, sizeof (module->posts[0]));
if (NULL == module->posts) return OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
/* set module->posts[0] first to ensure 64-bit alignment */
module->posts[0] = (uint64_t *) (module->segment_base);
module->global_state = (ompi_osc_sm_global_state_t *) (module->posts[0] + comm_size * post_size);
module->node_states = (ompi_osc_sm_node_state_t *) (module->global_state + 1);
for (i = 0, total = state_size + posts_size ; i < comm_size ; ++i) {
if (i > 0) {
module->posts[i] = module->posts[i - 1] + post_size;
}
module->sizes[i] = rbuf[i];
if (module->sizes[i]) {
module->bases[i] = ((char *) module->segment_base) + total;
total += rbuf[i];
} else {
module->bases[i] = NULL;
}
}
free(rbuf);
}
/* initialize my state shared */
module->my_node_state = &module->node_states[ompi_comm_rank(module->comm)];
memset (module->my_node_state, 0, sizeof(*module->my_node_state));
*base = module->bases[ompi_comm_rank(module->comm)];
opal_atomic_init(&module->my_node_state->accumulate_lock, OPAL_ATOMIC_UNLOCKED);
/* share everyone's displacement units. */
module->disp_units = malloc(sizeof(int) * comm_size);
ret = module->comm->c_coll->coll_allgather(&disp_unit, 1, MPI_INT,
module->disp_units, 1, MPI_INT,
module->comm,
module->comm->c_coll->coll_allgather_module);
if (OMPI_SUCCESS != ret) goto error;
module->start_group = NULL;
module->post_group = NULL;
/* initialize synchronization code */
module->my_sense = 1;
module->outstanding_locks = calloc(comm_size, sizeof(enum ompi_osc_sm_locktype_t));
if (NULL == module->outstanding_locks) {
ret = OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
goto error;
}
if (0 == ompi_comm_rank(module->comm)) {
#if HAVE_PTHREAD_CONDATTR_SETPSHARED && HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEXATTR_SETPSHARED
pthread_mutexattr_t mattr;
pthread_condattr_t cattr;
bool blocking_fence=false;
int flag;
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
if (OMPI_SUCCESS != opal_info_get_bool(info, "blocking_fence",
&blocking_fence, &flag)) {
goto error;
}
if (flag && blocking_fence) {
ret = pthread_mutexattr_init(&mattr);
ret = pthread_mutexattr_setpshared(&mattr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED);
if (ret != 0) {
module->global_state->use_barrier_for_fence = 1;
} else {
ret = pthread_mutex_init(&module->global_state->mtx, &mattr);
if (ret != 0) {
module->global_state->use_barrier_for_fence = 1;
} else {
pthread_condattr_init(&cattr);
pthread_condattr_setpshared(&cattr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED);
ret = pthread_cond_init(&module->global_state->cond, &cattr);
if (ret != 0) return OMPI_ERROR;
pthread_condattr_destroy(&cattr);
}
}
module->global_state->use_barrier_for_fence = 0;
module->global_state->sense = module->my_sense;
module->global_state->count = comm_size;
pthread_mutexattr_destroy(&mattr);
} else {
module->global_state->use_barrier_for_fence = 1;
}
#else
module->global_state->use_barrier_for_fence = 1;
#endif
}
ret = module->comm->c_coll->coll_barrier(module->comm,
module->comm->c_coll->coll_barrier_module);
if (OMPI_SUCCESS != ret) goto error;
*model = MPI_WIN_UNIFIED;
win->w_osc_module = &module->super;
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
error:
win->w_osc_module = &module->super;
ompi_osc_sm_free (win);
return ret;
}
int
ompi_osc_sm_shared_query(struct ompi_win_t *win, int rank, size_t *size, int *disp_unit, void *baseptr)
{
ompi_osc_sm_module_t *module =
(ompi_osc_sm_module_t*) win->w_osc_module;
if (module->flavor != MPI_WIN_FLAVOR_SHARED) {
return MPI_ERR_WIN;
}
if (MPI_PROC_NULL != rank) {
*size = module->sizes[rank];
*((void**) baseptr) = module->bases[rank];
*disp_unit = module->disp_units[rank];
} else {
int i = 0;
*size = 0;
*((void**) baseptr) = NULL;
*disp_unit = 0;
for (i = 0 ; i < ompi_comm_size(module->comm) ; ++i) {
if (0 != module->sizes[i]) {
*size = module->sizes[i];
*((void**) baseptr) = module->bases[i];
*disp_unit = module->disp_units[i];
break;
}
}
}
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
}
int
ompi_osc_sm_attach(struct ompi_win_t *win, void *base, size_t len)
{
ompi_osc_sm_module_t *module =
(ompi_osc_sm_module_t*) win->w_osc_module;
if (module->flavor != MPI_WIN_FLAVOR_DYNAMIC) {
return MPI_ERR_RMA_ATTACH;
}
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
}
int
ompi_osc_sm_detach(struct ompi_win_t *win, const void *base)
{
ompi_osc_sm_module_t *module =
(ompi_osc_sm_module_t*) win->w_osc_module;
if (module->flavor != MPI_WIN_FLAVOR_DYNAMIC) {
return MPI_ERR_RMA_ATTACH;
}
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
}
int
ompi_osc_sm_free(struct ompi_win_t *win)
{
ompi_osc_sm_module_t *module =
(ompi_osc_sm_module_t*) win->w_osc_module;
/* free memory */
if (NULL != module->segment_base) {
/* synchronize */
module->comm->c_coll->coll_barrier(module->comm,
module->comm->c_coll->coll_barrier_module);
if (0 == ompi_comm_rank (module->comm)) {
opal_shmem_unlink (&module->seg_ds);
}
opal_shmem_segment_detach (&module->seg_ds);
} else {
free(module->node_states);
free(module->global_state);
free(module->bases[0]);
}
free(module->disp_units);
free(module->outstanding_locks);
free(module->sizes);
free(module->bases);
free (module->posts);
/* cleanup */
ompi_comm_free(&module->comm);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&module->lock);
free(module);
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
}
int
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
ompi_osc_sm_set_info(struct ompi_win_t *win, struct opal_info_t *info)
{
ompi_osc_sm_module_t *module =
(ompi_osc_sm_module_t*) win->w_osc_module;
/* enforce collectiveness... */
return module->comm->c_coll->coll_barrier(module->comm,
module->comm->c_coll->coll_barrier_module);
}
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
static char*
component_set_blocking_fence_info(void *obj, char *key, char *val)
{
ompi_osc_sm_module_t *module = (ompi_osc_sm_module_t*) ((struct ompi_win_t*) obj)->w_osc_module;
/*
* Assuming that you can't change the default.
*/
return module->global_state->use_barrier_for_fence ? "true" : "false";
}
static char*
component_set_alloc_shared_noncontig_info(void *obj, char *key, char *val)
{
ompi_osc_sm_module_t *module = (ompi_osc_sm_module_t*) ((struct ompi_win_t*) obj)->w_osc_module;
/*
* Assuming that you can't change the default.
*/
return module->noncontig ? "true" : "false";
}
int
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
ompi_osc_sm_get_info(struct ompi_win_t *win, struct opal_info_t **info_used)
{
ompi_osc_sm_module_t *module =
(ompi_osc_sm_module_t*) win->w_osc_module;
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
opal_info_t *info = OBJ_NEW(opal_info_t);
if (NULL == info) return OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
if (module->flavor == MPI_WIN_FLAVOR_SHARED) {
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
opal_info_set(info, "blocking_fence",
(1 == module->global_state->use_barrier_for_fence) ? "true" : "false");
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 12:02:01 -05:00
opal_info_set(info, "alloc_shared_noncontig",
(module->noncontig) ? "true" : "false");
}
*info_used = info;
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
}