1
1
openmpi/ompi/mca/rte/orte/rte_orte.h

144 строки
4.9 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/*
* Copyright (c) 2012-2013 Los Alamos National Security, LLC.
* All rights reserved.
For large scale systems, we would like to avoid doing a full modex during MPI_Init so that launch will scale a little better. At the moment, our options are somewhat limited as only a few BTLs don't immediately call modex_recv on all procs during startup. However, for those situations where someone can take advantage of it, add the ability to do a "modex on demand" retrieval of data from remote procs when we launch via mpirun. NOTE: launch performance will be absolutely awful if you do this with BTLs that aren't configured to modex_recv on first message! Even with "modex on demand", we still have to do a barrier in place of the modex - we simply don't move any data around, which does reduce the time impact. The barrier is required to ensure that the other proc has in fact registered all its BTL info and therefore is prepared to hand over a complete data package. Otherwise, you may not get the info you need. In addition, the shared memory BTL can fail to properly rendezvous as it expects the barrier to be in place. This behavior will *only* take effect under the following conditions: 1. launched via mpirun 2. #procs is greater than ompi_hostname_cutoff, which defaults to UINT32_MAX 3. mca param rte_orte_direct_modex is set to 1. At the moment, we are having problems getting this param to register properly, so only the first two conditions are in effect. Still, the bottom line is you have to *want* this behavior to get it. The planned next evolution of this will be to make the direct modex be non-blocking - this will require two fixes: 1. if the remote proc doesn't have the required info, then let it delay its response until it does. This means we need a way for the MPI layer to tell the RTE "I am done entering modex data". 2. adjust the SM rendezvous logic to loop until the required file has been created Creating a placeholder to bring this over to 1.7.5 when ready. cmr=v1.7.5:reviewer=hjelmn:subject=Enable direct modex at scale This commit was SVN r30259.
2014-01-11 17:36:06 +00:00
* Copyright (c) 2013-2014 Intel, Inc. All rights reserved
* Copyright (c) 2014 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2014 Research Organization for Information Science
* and Technology (RIST). All rights reserved.
* $COPYRIGHT$
2015-06-23 20:59:57 -07:00
*
* Additional copyrights may follow
2015-06-23 20:59:57 -07:00
*
* $HEADER$
*
* When this component is used, this file is included in the rest of
* the OPAL/ORTE/OMPI code base via ompi/mca/rte/rte.h. As such,
* this header represents the public interface to this static component.
*/
#ifndef MCA_OMPI_RTE_ORTE_H
#define MCA_OMPI_RTE_ORTE_H
#include "ompi_config.h"
#include "ompi/constants.h"
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
struct opal_proc_t;
#include "opal/threads/threads.h"
#include "orte/types.h"
#include "orte/mca/errmgr/errmgr.h"
#include "orte/mca/rml/base/rml_contact.h"
#include "orte/mca/rml/rml.h"
#include "orte/mca/routed/routed.h"
#include "orte/runtime/orte_data_server.h"
#include "orte/runtime/runtime.h"
#include "orte/util/name_fns.h"
#include "orte/util/proc_info.h"
#include "ompi/info/info.h"
struct ompi_proc_t;
struct ompi_communicator_t;
BEGIN_C_DECLS
/* Process name objects and operations */
typedef orte_process_name_t ompi_process_name_t;
typedef orte_jobid_t ompi_jobid_t;
typedef orte_vpid_t ompi_vpid_t;
typedef orte_ns_cmp_bitmask_t ompi_rte_cmp_bitmask_t;
#define OMPI_PROC_MY_NAME ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 00:47:28 +00:00
#define OMPI_NAME_PRINT(a) ORTE_NAME_PRINT((const orte_process_name_t*)a)
#define ompi_rte_compare_name_fields(a, b, c) orte_util_compare_name_fields(a, (const orte_process_name_t*)(b), (const orte_process_name_t*)(c))
#define OMPI_NAME_WILDCARD ORTE_NAME_WILDCARD
#define OMPI_NODE_RANK_INVALID ORTE_NODE_RANK_INVALID
#define OMPI_LOCAL_RANK_INVALID ORTE_LOCAL_RANK_INVALID
#define OMPI_RTE_CMP_JOBID ORTE_NS_CMP_JOBID
#define OMPI_RTE_CMP_VPID ORTE_NS_CMP_VPID
#define OMPI_RTE_CMP_ALL ORTE_NS_CMP_ALL
/* This is the DSS tag to serialize a proc name */
#define OMPI_NAME ORTE_NAME
#define OMPI_PROCESS_NAME_HTON ORTE_PROCESS_NAME_HTON
#define OMPI_PROCESS_NAME_NTOH ORTE_PROCESS_NAME_NTOH
#define OMPI_RTE_MY_NODEID ORTE_PROC_MY_DAEMON->vpid
/* database keys */
#define OMPI_RTE_NODE_ID ORTE_DB_DAEMON_VPID
#define OMPI_RTE_HOST_ID ORTE_DB_HOSTID
#if OPAL_ENABLE_DEBUG
static inline orte_process_name_t * OMPI_CAST_RTE_NAME(opal_process_name_t * name);
#else
#define OMPI_CAST_RTE_NAME(a) ((orte_process_name_t*)(a))
#endif
/* Process info struct and values */
typedef orte_node_rank_t ompi_node_rank_t;
typedef orte_local_rank_t ompi_local_rank_t;
#define ompi_process_info orte_process_info
#define ompi_rte_proc_is_bound orte_proc_is_bound
/* Error handling objects and operations */
2015-06-23 20:59:57 -07:00
OMPI_DECLSPEC void __opal_attribute_noreturn__
ompi_rte_abort(int error_code, char *fmt, ...);
#define ompi_rte_abort_peers(a, b, c) orte_errmgr.abort_peers(a, b, c)
Per the RFC and discussion on the devel list, update the RTE-MPI error handling interface. There are a few differences in the code from the original RFC that came out of the discussion - I've captured those in the following writeup George and I were talking about ORTE's error handling the other day in regards to the right way to deal with errors in the updated OOB. Specifically, it seemed a bad idea for a library such as ORTE to be aborting the job on its own prerogative. If we lose a connection or cannot send a message, then we really should just report it upwards and let the application and/or upper layers decide what to do about it. The current code base only allows a single error callback to exist, which seemed unduly limiting. So, based on the conversation, I've modified the errmgr interface to provide a mechanism for registering any number of error handlers (this replaces the current "set_fault_callback" API). When an error occurs, these handlers will be called in order until one responds that the error has been "resolved" - i.e., no further action is required - by returning OMPI_SUCCESS. The default MPI layer error handler is specified to go "last" and calls mpi_abort, so the current "abort" behavior is preserved unless other error handlers are registered. In the register_callback function, I provide an "order" param so you can specify "this callback must come first" or "this callback must come last". Seemed to me that we will probably have different code areas registering callbacks, and one might require it go first (the default "abort" will always require it go last). So you can append and prepend, or go first. Note that only one registration can declare itself "first" or "last", and since the default "abort" callback automatically takes "last", that one isn't available. :-) The errhandler callback function passes an opal_pointer_array of structs, each of which contains the name of the proc involved (which can be yourself for internal errors) and the error code. This is a change from the current fault callback which returned an opal_pointer_array of just process names. Rationale is that you might need to see the cause of the error to decide what action to take. I realize that isn't a requirement for remote procs, but remember that we will use the SAME interface to report RTE errors internal to the proc itself. In those cases, you really do need to see the error code. It is legal to pass a NULL for the pointer array (e.g., when reporting an internal failure without error code), so handlers must be prepared for that possibility. If people find that too burdensome, we can remove it. Should we ever decide to create a separate callback path for internal errors vs remote process failures, or if we decide to do something different based on experience, then we can adjust this API. This commit was SVN r28852.
2013-07-19 01:08:53 +00:00
#define OMPI_RTE_ERRHANDLER_FIRST ORTE_ERRMGR_CALLBACK_FIRST
#define OMPI_RTE_ERRHANDLER_LAST ORTE_ERRMGR_CALLBACK_LAST
#define OMPI_RTE_ERRHANDLER_PREPEND ORTE_ERRMGR_CALLBACK_PREPEND
#define OMPI_RTE_ERRHANDLER_APPEND ORTE_ERRMGR_CALLBACK_APPEND
typedef orte_error_t ompi_rte_error_report_t;
#define ompi_rte_register_errhandler(a, b) orte_errmgr.register_error_callback(a, b)
#define OMPI_ERROR_LOG ORTE_ERROR_LOG
/* Init and finalize objects and operations */
#define ompi_rte_init(a, b) orte_init(a, b, ORTE_PROC_MPI)
#define ompi_rte_finalize() orte_finalize()
OMPI_DECLSPEC void ompi_rte_wait_for_debugger(void);
#define OMPI_DB_HOSTNAME ORTE_DB_HOSTNAME
#define OMPI_DB_LOCALITY ORTE_DB_LOCALITY
#define OMPI_DB_GLOBAL_RANK ORTE_DB_GLOBAL_RANK
/* Communications */
typedef orte_rml_tag_t ompi_rml_tag_t;
As per the RFC, bring in the ORTE async progress code and the rewrite of OOB: *** THIS RFC INCLUDES A MINOR CHANGE TO THE MPI-RTE INTERFACE *** Note: during the course of this work, it was necessary to completely separate the MPI and RTE progress engines. There were multiple places in the MPI layer where ORTE_WAIT_FOR_COMPLETION was being used. A new OMPI_WAIT_FOR_COMPLETION macro was created (defined in ompi/mca/rte/rte.h) that simply cycles across opal_progress until the provided flag becomes false. Places where the MPI layer blocked waiting for RTE to complete an event have been modified to use this macro. *************************************************************************************** I am reissuing this RFC because of the time that has passed since its original release. Since its initial release and review, I have debugged it further to ensure it fully supports tests like loop_spawn. It therefore seems ready for merge back to the trunk. Given its prior review, I have set the timeout for one week. The code is in https://bitbucket.org/rhc/ompi-oob2 WHAT: Rewrite of ORTE OOB WHY: Support asynchronous progress and a host of other features WHEN: Wed, August 21 SYNOPSIS: The current OOB has served us well, but a number of limitations have been identified over the years. Specifically: * it is only progressed when called via opal_progress, which can lead to hangs or recursive calls into libevent (which is not supported by that code) * we've had issues when multiple NICs are available as the code doesn't "shift" messages between transports - thus, all nodes had to be available via the same TCP interface. * the OOB "unloads" incoming opal_buffer_t objects during the transmission, thus preventing use of OBJ_RETAIN in the code when repeatedly sending the same message to multiple recipients * there is no failover mechanism across NICs - if the selected NIC (or its attached switch) fails, we are forced to abort * only one transport (i.e., component) can be "active" The revised OOB resolves these problems: * async progress is used for all application processes, with the progress thread blocking in the event library * each available TCP NIC is supported by its own TCP module. The ability to asynchronously progress each module independently is provided, but not enabled by default (a runtime MCA parameter turns it "on") * multi-address TCP NICs (e.g., a NIC with both an IPv4 and IPv6 address, or with virtual interfaces) are supported - reachability is determined by comparing the contact info for a peer against all addresses within the range covered by the address/mask pairs for the NIC. * a message that arrives on one TCP NIC is automatically shifted to whatever NIC that is connected to the next "hop" if that peer cannot be reached by the incoming NIC. If no TCP module will reach the peer, then the OOB attempts to send the message via all other available components - if none can reach the peer, then an "error" is reported back to the RML, which then calls the errmgr for instructions. * opal_buffer_t now conforms to standard object rules re OBJ_RETAIN as we no longer "unload" the incoming object * NIC failure is reported to the TCP component, which then tries to resend the message across any other available TCP NIC. If that doesn't work, then the message is given back to the OOB base to try using other components. If all that fails, then the error is reported to the RML, which reports to the errmgr for instructions * obviously from the above, multiple OOB components (e.g., TCP and UD) can be active in parallel * the matching code has been moved to the RML (and out of the OOB/TCP component) so it is independent of transport * routing is done by the individual OOB modules (as opposed to the RML). Thus, both routed and non-routed transports can simultaneously be active * all blocking send/recv APIs have been removed. Everything operates asynchronously. KNOWN LIMITATIONS: * although provision is made for component failover as described above, the code for doing so has not been fully implemented yet. At the moment, if all connections for a given peer fail, the errmgr is notified of a "lost connection", which by default results in termination of the job if it was a lifeline * the IPv6 code is present and compiles, but is not complete. Since the current IPv6 support in the OOB doesn't work anyway, I don't consider this a blocker * routing is performed at the individual module level, yet the active routed component is selected on a global basis. We probably should update that to reflect that different transports may need/choose to route in different ways * obviously, not every error path has been tested nor necessarily covered * determining abnormal termination is more challenging than in the old code as we now potentially have multiple ways of connecting to a process. Ideally, we would declare "connection failed" when *all* transports can no longer reach the process, but that requires some additional (possibly complex) code. For now, the code replicates the old behavior only somewhat modified - i.e., if a module sees its connection fail, it checks to see if it is a lifeline. If so, it notifies the errmgr that the lifeline is lost - otherwise, it notifies the errmgr that a non-lifeline connection was lost. * reachability is determined solely on the basis of a shared subnet address/mask - more sophisticated algorithms (e.g., the one used in the tcp btl) are required to handle routing via gateways * the RML needs to assign sequence numbers to each message on a per-peer basis. The receiving RML will then deliver messages in order, thus preventing out-of-order messaging in the case where messages travel across different transports or a message needs to be redirected/resent due to failure of a NIC This commit was SVN r29058.
2013-08-22 16:37:40 +00:00
#define ompi_rte_send_buffer_nb(a, b, c, d, e) orte_rml.send_buffer_nb(a, b, c, d, e)
#define ompi_rte_recv_buffer_nb(a, b, c, d, e) orte_rml.recv_buffer_nb(a, b, c, d, e)
#define ompi_rte_recv_cancel(a, b) orte_rml.recv_cancel(a, b)
#define ompi_rte_parse_uris(a, b, c) orte_rml_base_parse_uris(a, b, c)
As per the RFC, bring in the ORTE async progress code and the rewrite of OOB: *** THIS RFC INCLUDES A MINOR CHANGE TO THE MPI-RTE INTERFACE *** Note: during the course of this work, it was necessary to completely separate the MPI and RTE progress engines. There were multiple places in the MPI layer where ORTE_WAIT_FOR_COMPLETION was being used. A new OMPI_WAIT_FOR_COMPLETION macro was created (defined in ompi/mca/rte/rte.h) that simply cycles across opal_progress until the provided flag becomes false. Places where the MPI layer blocked waiting for RTE to complete an event have been modified to use this macro. *************************************************************************************** I am reissuing this RFC because of the time that has passed since its original release. Since its initial release and review, I have debugged it further to ensure it fully supports tests like loop_spawn. It therefore seems ready for merge back to the trunk. Given its prior review, I have set the timeout for one week. The code is in https://bitbucket.org/rhc/ompi-oob2 WHAT: Rewrite of ORTE OOB WHY: Support asynchronous progress and a host of other features WHEN: Wed, August 21 SYNOPSIS: The current OOB has served us well, but a number of limitations have been identified over the years. Specifically: * it is only progressed when called via opal_progress, which can lead to hangs or recursive calls into libevent (which is not supported by that code) * we've had issues when multiple NICs are available as the code doesn't "shift" messages between transports - thus, all nodes had to be available via the same TCP interface. * the OOB "unloads" incoming opal_buffer_t objects during the transmission, thus preventing use of OBJ_RETAIN in the code when repeatedly sending the same message to multiple recipients * there is no failover mechanism across NICs - if the selected NIC (or its attached switch) fails, we are forced to abort * only one transport (i.e., component) can be "active" The revised OOB resolves these problems: * async progress is used for all application processes, with the progress thread blocking in the event library * each available TCP NIC is supported by its own TCP module. The ability to asynchronously progress each module independently is provided, but not enabled by default (a runtime MCA parameter turns it "on") * multi-address TCP NICs (e.g., a NIC with both an IPv4 and IPv6 address, or with virtual interfaces) are supported - reachability is determined by comparing the contact info for a peer against all addresses within the range covered by the address/mask pairs for the NIC. * a message that arrives on one TCP NIC is automatically shifted to whatever NIC that is connected to the next "hop" if that peer cannot be reached by the incoming NIC. If no TCP module will reach the peer, then the OOB attempts to send the message via all other available components - if none can reach the peer, then an "error" is reported back to the RML, which then calls the errmgr for instructions. * opal_buffer_t now conforms to standard object rules re OBJ_RETAIN as we no longer "unload" the incoming object * NIC failure is reported to the TCP component, which then tries to resend the message across any other available TCP NIC. If that doesn't work, then the message is given back to the OOB base to try using other components. If all that fails, then the error is reported to the RML, which reports to the errmgr for instructions * obviously from the above, multiple OOB components (e.g., TCP and UD) can be active in parallel * the matching code has been moved to the RML (and out of the OOB/TCP component) so it is independent of transport * routing is done by the individual OOB modules (as opposed to the RML). Thus, both routed and non-routed transports can simultaneously be active * all blocking send/recv APIs have been removed. Everything operates asynchronously. KNOWN LIMITATIONS: * although provision is made for component failover as described above, the code for doing so has not been fully implemented yet. At the moment, if all connections for a given peer fail, the errmgr is notified of a "lost connection", which by default results in termination of the job if it was a lifeline * the IPv6 code is present and compiles, but is not complete. Since the current IPv6 support in the OOB doesn't work anyway, I don't consider this a blocker * routing is performed at the individual module level, yet the active routed component is selected on a global basis. We probably should update that to reflect that different transports may need/choose to route in different ways * obviously, not every error path has been tested nor necessarily covered * determining abnormal termination is more challenging than in the old code as we now potentially have multiple ways of connecting to a process. Ideally, we would declare "connection failed" when *all* transports can no longer reach the process, but that requires some additional (possibly complex) code. For now, the code replicates the old behavior only somewhat modified - i.e., if a module sees its connection fail, it checks to see if it is a lifeline. If so, it notifies the errmgr that the lifeline is lost - otherwise, it notifies the errmgr that a non-lifeline connection was lost. * reachability is determined solely on the basis of a shared subnet address/mask - more sophisticated algorithms (e.g., the one used in the tcp btl) are required to handle routing via gateways * the RML needs to assign sequence numbers to each message on a per-peer basis. The receiving RML will then deliver messages in order, thus preventing out-of-order messaging in the case where messages travel across different transports or a message needs to be redirected/resent due to failure of a NIC This commit was SVN r29058.
2013-08-22 16:37:40 +00:00
#define ompi_rte_send_cbfunc orte_rml_send_callback
/* Communication tags */
/* carry over the INVALID def */
#define OMPI_RML_TAG_INVALID ORTE_RML_TAG_INVALID
/* define a starting point to avoid conflicts */
#define OMPI_RML_TAG_BASE ORTE_RML_TAG_MAX
As per the RFC, bring in the ORTE async progress code and the rewrite of OOB: *** THIS RFC INCLUDES A MINOR CHANGE TO THE MPI-RTE INTERFACE *** Note: during the course of this work, it was necessary to completely separate the MPI and RTE progress engines. There were multiple places in the MPI layer where ORTE_WAIT_FOR_COMPLETION was being used. A new OMPI_WAIT_FOR_COMPLETION macro was created (defined in ompi/mca/rte/rte.h) that simply cycles across opal_progress until the provided flag becomes false. Places where the MPI layer blocked waiting for RTE to complete an event have been modified to use this macro. *************************************************************************************** I am reissuing this RFC because of the time that has passed since its original release. Since its initial release and review, I have debugged it further to ensure it fully supports tests like loop_spawn. It therefore seems ready for merge back to the trunk. Given its prior review, I have set the timeout for one week. The code is in https://bitbucket.org/rhc/ompi-oob2 WHAT: Rewrite of ORTE OOB WHY: Support asynchronous progress and a host of other features WHEN: Wed, August 21 SYNOPSIS: The current OOB has served us well, but a number of limitations have been identified over the years. Specifically: * it is only progressed when called via opal_progress, which can lead to hangs or recursive calls into libevent (which is not supported by that code) * we've had issues when multiple NICs are available as the code doesn't "shift" messages between transports - thus, all nodes had to be available via the same TCP interface. * the OOB "unloads" incoming opal_buffer_t objects during the transmission, thus preventing use of OBJ_RETAIN in the code when repeatedly sending the same message to multiple recipients * there is no failover mechanism across NICs - if the selected NIC (or its attached switch) fails, we are forced to abort * only one transport (i.e., component) can be "active" The revised OOB resolves these problems: * async progress is used for all application processes, with the progress thread blocking in the event library * each available TCP NIC is supported by its own TCP module. The ability to asynchronously progress each module independently is provided, but not enabled by default (a runtime MCA parameter turns it "on") * multi-address TCP NICs (e.g., a NIC with both an IPv4 and IPv6 address, or with virtual interfaces) are supported - reachability is determined by comparing the contact info for a peer against all addresses within the range covered by the address/mask pairs for the NIC. * a message that arrives on one TCP NIC is automatically shifted to whatever NIC that is connected to the next "hop" if that peer cannot be reached by the incoming NIC. If no TCP module will reach the peer, then the OOB attempts to send the message via all other available components - if none can reach the peer, then an "error" is reported back to the RML, which then calls the errmgr for instructions. * opal_buffer_t now conforms to standard object rules re OBJ_RETAIN as we no longer "unload" the incoming object * NIC failure is reported to the TCP component, which then tries to resend the message across any other available TCP NIC. If that doesn't work, then the message is given back to the OOB base to try using other components. If all that fails, then the error is reported to the RML, which reports to the errmgr for instructions * obviously from the above, multiple OOB components (e.g., TCP and UD) can be active in parallel * the matching code has been moved to the RML (and out of the OOB/TCP component) so it is independent of transport * routing is done by the individual OOB modules (as opposed to the RML). Thus, both routed and non-routed transports can simultaneously be active * all blocking send/recv APIs have been removed. Everything operates asynchronously. KNOWN LIMITATIONS: * although provision is made for component failover as described above, the code for doing so has not been fully implemented yet. At the moment, if all connections for a given peer fail, the errmgr is notified of a "lost connection", which by default results in termination of the job if it was a lifeline * the IPv6 code is present and compiles, but is not complete. Since the current IPv6 support in the OOB doesn't work anyway, I don't consider this a blocker * routing is performed at the individual module level, yet the active routed component is selected on a global basis. We probably should update that to reflect that different transports may need/choose to route in different ways * obviously, not every error path has been tested nor necessarily covered * determining abnormal termination is more challenging than in the old code as we now potentially have multiple ways of connecting to a process. Ideally, we would declare "connection failed" when *all* transports can no longer reach the process, but that requires some additional (possibly complex) code. For now, the code replicates the old behavior only somewhat modified - i.e., if a module sees its connection fail, it checks to see if it is a lifeline. If so, it notifies the errmgr that the lifeline is lost - otherwise, it notifies the errmgr that a non-lifeline connection was lost. * reachability is determined solely on the basis of a shared subnet address/mask - more sophisticated algorithms (e.g., the one used in the tcp btl) are required to handle routing via gateways * the RML needs to assign sequence numbers to each message on a per-peer basis. The receiving RML will then deliver messages in order, thus preventing out-of-order messaging in the case where messages travel across different transports or a message needs to be redirected/resent due to failure of a NIC This commit was SVN r29058.
2013-08-22 16:37:40 +00:00
#define OMPI_RML_PERSISTENT ORTE_RML_PERSISTENT
#define OMPI_RML_NON_PERSISTENT ORTE_RML_NON_PERSISTENT
typedef struct {
ompi_rte_component_t super;
opal_mutex_t lock;
opal_list_t modx_reqs;
} ompi_rte_orte_component_t;
typedef struct {
opal_list_item_t super;
opal_mutex_t lock;
opal_condition_t cond;
bool active;
orte_process_name_t peer;
} ompi_orte_tracker_t;
OBJ_CLASS_DECLARATION(ompi_orte_tracker_t);
For large scale systems, we would like to avoid doing a full modex during MPI_Init so that launch will scale a little better. At the moment, our options are somewhat limited as only a few BTLs don't immediately call modex_recv on all procs during startup. However, for those situations where someone can take advantage of it, add the ability to do a "modex on demand" retrieval of data from remote procs when we launch via mpirun. NOTE: launch performance will be absolutely awful if you do this with BTLs that aren't configured to modex_recv on first message! Even with "modex on demand", we still have to do a barrier in place of the modex - we simply don't move any data around, which does reduce the time impact. The barrier is required to ensure that the other proc has in fact registered all its BTL info and therefore is prepared to hand over a complete data package. Otherwise, you may not get the info you need. In addition, the shared memory BTL can fail to properly rendezvous as it expects the barrier to be in place. This behavior will *only* take effect under the following conditions: 1. launched via mpirun 2. #procs is greater than ompi_hostname_cutoff, which defaults to UINT32_MAX 3. mca param rte_orte_direct_modex is set to 1. At the moment, we are having problems getting this param to register properly, so only the first two conditions are in effect. Still, the bottom line is you have to *want* this behavior to get it. The planned next evolution of this will be to make the direct modex be non-blocking - this will require two fixes: 1. if the remote proc doesn't have the required info, then let it delay its response until it does. This means we need a way for the MPI layer to tell the RTE "I am done entering modex data". 2. adjust the SM rendezvous logic to loop until the required file has been created Creating a placeholder to bring this over to 1.7.5 when ready. cmr=v1.7.5:reviewer=hjelmn:subject=Enable direct modex at scale This commit was SVN r30259.
2014-01-11 17:36:06 +00:00
#if OPAL_ENABLE_DEBUG
static inline orte_process_name_t * OMPI_CAST_RTE_NAME(opal_process_name_t * name) {
return (orte_process_name_t *)name;
}
#endif
Per the PMIx RFC: WHAT: Merge the PMIx branch into the devel repo, creating a new OPAL “lmix” framework to abstract PMI support for all RTEs. Replace the ORTE daemon-level collectives with a new PMIx server and update the ORTE grpcomm framework to support server-to-server collectives WHY: We’ve had problems dealing with variations in PMI implementations, and need to extend the existing PMI definitions to meet exascale requirements. WHEN: Mon, Aug 25 WHERE: https://github.com/rhc54/ompi-svn-mirror.git Several community members have been working on a refactoring of the current PMI support within OMPI. Although the APIs are common, Slurm and Cray implement a different range of capabilities, and package them differently. For example, Cray provides an integrated PMI-1/2 library, while Slurm separates the two and requires the user to specify the one to be used at runtime. In addition, several bugs in the Slurm implementations have caused problems requiring extra coding. All this has led to a slew of #if’s in the PMI code and bugs when the corner-case logic for one implementation accidentally traps the other. Extending this support to other implementations would have increased this complexity to an unacceptable level. Accordingly, we have: * created a new OPAL “pmix” framework to abstract the PMI support, with separate components for Cray, Slurm PMI-1, and Slurm PMI-2 implementations. * Replaced the current ORTE grpcomm daemon-based collective operation with an integrated PMIx server, and updated the grpcomm APIs to provide more flexible, multi-algorithm support for collective operations. At this time, only the xcast and allgather operations are supported. * Replaced the current global collective id with a signature based on the names of the participating procs. The allows an unlimited number of collectives to be executed by any group of processes, subject to the requirement that only one collective can be active at a time for a unique combination of procs. Note that a proc can be involved in any number of simultaneous collectives - it is the specific combination of procs that is subject to the constraint * removed the prior OMPI/OPAL modex code * added new macros for executing modex send/recv to simplify use of the new APIs. The send macros allow the caller to specify whether or not the BTL supports async modex operations - if so, then the non-blocking “fence” operation is used, if the active PMIx component supports it. Otherwise, the default is a full blocking modex exchange as we currently perform. * retained the current flag that directs us to use a blocking fence operation, but only to retrieve data upon demand This commit was SVN r32570.
2014-08-21 18:56:47 +00:00
#define ompi_direct_modex_cutoff orte_direct_modex_cutoff
Per the PMIx RFC: WHAT: Merge the PMIx branch into the devel repo, creating a new OPAL “lmix” framework to abstract PMI support for all RTEs. Replace the ORTE daemon-level collectives with a new PMIx server and update the ORTE grpcomm framework to support server-to-server collectives WHY: We’ve had problems dealing with variations in PMI implementations, and need to extend the existing PMI definitions to meet exascale requirements. WHEN: Mon, Aug 25 WHERE: https://github.com/rhc54/ompi-svn-mirror.git Several community members have been working on a refactoring of the current PMI support within OMPI. Although the APIs are common, Slurm and Cray implement a different range of capabilities, and package them differently. For example, Cray provides an integrated PMI-1/2 library, while Slurm separates the two and requires the user to specify the one to be used at runtime. In addition, several bugs in the Slurm implementations have caused problems requiring extra coding. All this has led to a slew of #if’s in the PMI code and bugs when the corner-case logic for one implementation accidentally traps the other. Extending this support to other implementations would have increased this complexity to an unacceptable level. Accordingly, we have: * created a new OPAL “pmix” framework to abstract the PMI support, with separate components for Cray, Slurm PMI-1, and Slurm PMI-2 implementations. * Replaced the current ORTE grpcomm daemon-based collective operation with an integrated PMIx server, and updated the grpcomm APIs to provide more flexible, multi-algorithm support for collective operations. At this time, only the xcast and allgather operations are supported. * Replaced the current global collective id with a signature based on the names of the participating procs. The allows an unlimited number of collectives to be executed by any group of processes, subject to the requirement that only one collective can be active at a time for a unique combination of procs. Note that a proc can be involved in any number of simultaneous collectives - it is the specific combination of procs that is subject to the constraint * removed the prior OMPI/OPAL modex code * added new macros for executing modex send/recv to simplify use of the new APIs. The send macros allow the caller to specify whether or not the BTL supports async modex operations - if so, then the non-blocking “fence” operation is used, if the active PMIx component supports it. Otherwise, the default is a full blocking modex exchange as we currently perform. * retained the current flag that directs us to use a blocking fence operation, but only to retrieve data upon demand This commit was SVN r32570.
2014-08-21 18:56:47 +00:00
END_C_DECLS
#endif /* MCA_OMPI_RTE_ORTE_H */