1
1
openmpi/opal/mca/btl/usnic/btl_usnic_module.c

2332 строки
83 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/* -*- Mode: C; c-basic-offset:4 ; indent-tabs-mode:nil -*- */
/*
* Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Trustees of Indiana University and Indiana
* University Research and Technology
* Corporation. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2004-2008 The University of Tennessee and The University
* of Tennessee Research Foundation. All rights
* reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2004-2005 High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart,
* University of Stuttgart. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Regents of the University of California.
* All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2006 Sandia National Laboratories. All rights
* reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2009-2014 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2014 Los Alamos National Security, LLC. All rights
* reserved.
* $COPYRIGHT$
*
* Additional copyrights may follow
*
* $HEADER$
*/
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
#include "opal_config.h"
#include <errno.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
#include "opal/class/opal_bitmap.h"
#include "opal/prefetch.h"
#include "opal/util/output.h"
#include "opal/datatype/opal_convertor.h"
#include "opal/include/opal_stdint.h"
#include "opal/util/show_help.h"
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
#include "opal/mca/btl/btl.h"
#include "opal/mca/btl/base/btl_base_error.h"
#include "opal/mca/mpool/base/base.h"
#include "opal/mca/mpool/mpool.h"
#include "btl_usnic.h"
#include "btl_usnic_connectivity.h"
#include "btl_usnic_frag.h"
#include "btl_usnic_proc.h"
#include "btl_usnic_endpoint.h"
#include "btl_usnic_module.h"
#include "btl_usnic_util.h"
#include "btl_usnic_send.h"
#include "btl_usnic_ack.h"
#include "btl_usnic_hwloc.h"
Move all usNIC stats to _stats.c|h and export them as MPI_T pvars. This commit moves all the module stats into their own struct so that the stats only need to appear as a single line in the module_t definition, and then moves all the logic for reporting the stats into btl_usnic_stats.c|h. Further, the stats are now exported as MPI_T_BIND_NO_OBJECT entities (i.e., not bound to any particular MPI handle), and are marked as READONLY and CONTINUOUS. They currently all default to verbose level 5 ("Application tuner / detailed", according to https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/MCAParamLevels). Most of the statistics are counters, but a small number are high watermark values. Due to how counters are reported via MPI_T, none of the counters are exported through MPI_T if the MCA param btl_usnic_stats_relative=1 (i.e., the module resets the stats back to zero at a given frequency). When MPI_T_pvar_handle_alloc() is invoked on any of these pvars, it will return a count that is equal to the number of active usnic BTL modules. The values returned for any given pvar (e.g., num_total_sends) are an array containing one value for each active usnic BTL module. The ordering of values in the array is both consistent across all usnic pvars and stable throughout a single job: array slot 0 corresponds to module X, array slot 1 corresponds to module Y, etc. Mapping which array slot corresponds to which underlying Linux usnic_X device works as follows: * The btl_usnic_devices MPI_T state pvar is associated with a btl_usnic_device MPI_T enum, and be obtained via MPI_T_pvar_get_info(). * If all usNIC pvars are of length N, the values [0,N) in the btl_usnic_device enum are associated with strings of the corresponding underlying Linux device. For exampe, to look up which Linux device is reported in all usNIC pvars' array slot 1, look up the int value 1 in the btl_usnic_devices enum. Its corresponding string value is underlying Linux device name (e.g., "usnic_1"). cmr=v1.7.4:subject="usnic BTL MPI_T pvars" This commit was SVN r29545.
2013-10-29 02:23:08 +04:00
#include "btl_usnic_stats.h"
static void
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_channel_finalize(
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module,
struct opal_btl_usnic_channel_t *channel);
/* Compute and set the proper value for sfrag->sf_size. This must not be used
* during usnic_alloc, since the PML might change the segment size after
* usnic_alloc returns. */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
static inline void compute_sf_size(opal_btl_usnic_send_frag_t *sfrag)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_frag_t *frag;
frag = &sfrag->sf_base;
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
assert(frag->uf_base.des_local_count > 0);
assert(frag->uf_base.des_local_count <= 2);
/* belt and suspenders: second len should be zero if only one SGE */
assert(2 == frag->uf_base.des_local_count || 0 == frag->uf_local_seg[1].seg_len);
sfrag->sf_size = 0;
sfrag->sf_size += frag->uf_local_seg[0].seg_len;
sfrag->sf_size += frag->uf_local_seg[1].seg_len;
}
/*
* Loop over all procs sent to us in add_procs and see if we want to
* add a proc/endpoint for them.
*/
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
static int add_procs_create_endpoints(opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module,
size_t nprocs,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_proc_t **procs,
mca_btl_base_endpoint_t **endpoints)
{
int rc;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_proc_t* my_proc;
size_t num_created = 0;
/* get pointer to my proc structure */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
my_proc = opal_proc_local_get();
if (NULL == my_proc) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_ERR_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
}
/* Loop over the procs we were given */
for (size_t i = 0; i < nprocs; i++) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
struct opal_proc_t* opal_proc = procs[i];
opal_btl_usnic_proc_t* usnic_proc;
mca_btl_base_endpoint_t* usnic_endpoint;
endpoints[i] = NULL;
/* Do not create loopback usnic connections */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
if (opal_proc == my_proc) {
continue;
}
/* usNIC does not support loopback to the same machine */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
if (OPAL_PROC_ON_LOCAL_NODE(opal_proc->proc_flags)) {
continue;
}
/* Find (or create if it doesn't exist) this peer's proc.
This will receive the modex info for that proc. Note that
the proc is shared by all usnic modules that are trying
to reach this destination. */
usnic_proc = NULL;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
rc = opal_btl_usnic_proc_match(opal_proc, module, &usnic_proc);
if (OPAL_ERR_UNREACH == rc) {
/* If the peer doesn't have usnic modex info, then we just
skip it */
continue;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
} else if (OPAL_SUCCESS != rc) {
return OPAL_ERR_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
}
/* Create the endpoint for this proc/module combination. If we cannot
* reach this proc via this module, move on to the next proc. */
usnic_endpoint = NULL;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
rc = opal_btl_usnic_create_endpoint(module, usnic_proc,
&usnic_endpoint);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
if (OPAL_SUCCESS != rc) {
opal_output_verbose(5, USNIC_OUT,
"btl:usnic:%s: unable to create endpoint for module=%p proc=%p\n",
__func__, (void *)module, (void *)usnic_proc);
OBJ_RELEASE(usnic_proc);
continue;
}
/* We like this new endpoint; save it */
opal_pointer_array_add(&module->all_procs, usnic_proc);
union ibv_gid gid = usnic_endpoint->endpoint_remote_addr.gid;
opal_output_verbose(5, USNIC_OUT,
"btl:usnic: new usnic peer endpoint: subnet = 0x%016" PRIx64 ", interface = 0x%016" PRIx64,
ntoh64(gid.global.subnet_prefix),
ntoh64(gid.global.interface_id));
endpoints[i] = usnic_endpoint;
++num_created;
}
opal_output_verbose(5, USNIC_OUT,
"btl:usnic: made %" PRIsize_t " endpoints",
num_created);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
}
/*
* Print a warning about how the remote peer was unreachable.
*
* This is a separate helper function simply because it's somewhat
* bulky to put inline.
*/
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
static void add_procs_warn_ah_fail(opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module,
opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t *endpoint)
{
/* Only show the warning if it is enabled */
if (!mca_btl_usnic_component.show_route_failures) {
return;
}
char local[IPV4STRADDRLEN], remote[IPV4STRADDRLEN];
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_snprintf_ipv4_addr(local, sizeof(local),
module->local_addr.ipv4_addr,
module->local_addr.cidrmask);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_snprintf_ipv4_addr(remote, sizeof(remote),
endpoint->endpoint_remote_addr.ipv4_addr,
endpoint->endpoint_remote_addr.cidrmask);
opal_output_verbose(15, USNIC_OUT,
"btl:usnic: %s/%s (%s) couldn't reach peer %s",
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->if_name, local, remote);
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt", "create_ah failed",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
local,
module->if_name,
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
endpoint->endpoint_proc->proc_opal->proc_hostname,
remote);
}
/* The call to ibv_create_ah() may initiate an ARP resolution, and may
* therefore take some time to complete. Hence, it will return 1 of 4
* things:
*
* 1. a valid new ah
* 2. NULL and errno == EAGAIN (ARP not complete; try again later)
* 3. NULL and errno == EADDRNOTAVAIL (unable to reach peer)
* 4. NULL and errno != (EAGAIN or ADDRNOTAVAIL) (fatal error)
*
* Since ibv_create_ah() is therefore effectively non-blocking, we
* gang all the endpoint ah creations here in this loop so that we can
* get some parallelization of ARP resolution.
*/
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
static int add_procs_create_ahs(opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module,
size_t array_len,
struct mca_btl_base_endpoint_t **endpoints)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
int ret = OPAL_SUCCESS;
size_t i;
size_t num_ah_left;
time_t ts_last_created;
struct ibv_ah_attr ah_attr;
/* memset the ah_attr to both silence valgrind warnings (since the
attr struct ends up getting written down an fd to the kernel)
and actually zero out all the fields that we don't care about
and want to be logically false. */
memset(&ah_attr, 0, sizeof(ah_attr));
ah_attr.is_global = 1;
ah_attr.port_num = 1;
/* Mark all endpoints as unreachable (this should already be done,
but just be defensive) */
for (num_ah_left = i = 0; i < array_len; i++) {
if (NULL != endpoints[i]) {
endpoints[i]->endpoint_remote_ah = NULL;
++num_ah_left;
}
}
ts_last_created = time(NULL);
while (num_ah_left > 0) {
for (i = 0; i < array_len; i++) {
if (NULL != endpoints[i] &&
NULL == endpoints[i]->endpoint_remote_ah) {
ah_attr.grh.dgid = endpoints[i]->endpoint_remote_addr.gid;
endpoints[i]->endpoint_remote_ah =
ibv_create_ah(module->pd, &ah_attr);
/* Got a successfully-created AH */
if (NULL != endpoints[i]->endpoint_remote_ah) {
ts_last_created = time(NULL);
--num_ah_left;
}
/* Got some kind of address failure. This usually
means that we couldn't find a route to that peer
(e.g., the networking is hosed between us). So
just mark that we can't reach this peer, and print
a pretty warning. */
else if (EADDRNOTAVAIL == errno ||
EHOSTUNREACH == errno) {
add_procs_warn_ah_fail(module, endpoints[i]);
OBJ_RELEASE(endpoints[i]);
endpoints[i] = NULL;
--num_ah_left;
}
/* Got some other kind of error -- give up on this
interface. */
else if (EAGAIN != errno) {
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt", "ibv API failed",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->if_name,
"ibv_create_ah()", __FILE__, __LINE__,
"Failed to create an address handle");
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
ret = OPAL_ERR_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
break;
}
}
}
/* Has it been too long since our last AH creation (ARP
resolution)? If so, we're probably never going to finish,
so just mark all remaining endpoints as unreachable and
bail. */
if (num_ah_left > 0 &&
time(NULL) > (ts_last_created +
mca_btl_usnic_component.arp_timeout)) {
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt", "ibv_create_ah timeout",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->if_name,
mca_btl_usnic_component.arp_timeout);
break;
}
/* If we still have addresses that aren't resolved yet, sleep
a little to let kernel threads do some work behind the
scenes */
if (num_ah_left > 0) {
usleep(1);
}
}
/* Look through the list:
- If something went wrong above, free all endpoints.
- If an otherwise-valid endpoint has no AH, that means we timed
out trying to resolve it, so just release that endpoint. */
size_t num_created = 0;
for (i = 0; i < array_len; i++) {
if (NULL != endpoints[i]) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
if (OPAL_SUCCESS != ret ||
NULL == endpoints[i]->endpoint_remote_ah) {
OBJ_RELEASE(endpoints[i]);
endpoints[i] = NULL;
} else {
++num_created;
}
}
}
/* All done */
opal_output_verbose(5, USNIC_OUT,
"btl:usnic: made %" PRIsize_t " address handles",
num_created);
return ret;
}
/*
* Add procs to this BTL module, receiving endpoint information from
* the modex. This is done in 2 phases:
*
* 1. Find (or create) the remote proc, and create the associated
* endpoint.
* 2. Resolve the address handles for all remote endpoints.
*
* The second part is a separate loop from the first part to allow the
* address lookups to be done in parallel. This comes at a cost,
* however: we may determine during the 2nd part that we should tear
* down some or all the endpoints that we created in the 1st part.
* For example, ibv_create_ah() may fail in a fatal way (i.e., we
* should fail the entire add_procs()), or it may fail for one or more
* peers (i.e., we should just mark those peers as unreachable and not
* add a proc or endpoint for them).
*/
static int usnic_add_procs(struct mca_btl_base_module_t* base_module,
size_t nprocs,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
struct opal_proc_t **procs,
struct mca_btl_base_endpoint_t** endpoints,
opal_bitmap_t* reachable)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_module_t* module = (opal_btl_usnic_module_t*) base_module;
int rc;
/* First, create endpoints (and procs, if they're not already
created) for all the usnic-reachable procs we were given. */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
rc = add_procs_create_endpoints(module, nprocs, procs, endpoints);
if (OPAL_SUCCESS != rc) {
goto fail;
}
/* Create address handles for all the newly-created endpoints */
rc = add_procs_create_ahs(module, nprocs, endpoints);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
if (OPAL_SUCCESS != rc) {
goto fail;
}
/* Find all the endpoints with address handles and mark them as
reachable */
for (size_t i = 0; i < nprocs; ++i) {
if (NULL != endpoints[i] &&
NULL != endpoints[i]->endpoint_remote_ah) {
opal_bitmap_set_bit(reachable, i);
}
}
/* This is fairly gross, but we need to output the connectivity
map after add_procs() has been called on all existing usnic
modules. The only way I can think to do that is to count each
time add_procs() is called, and when we're at a multiple of
component.num_modules (i.e., add_procs() has been called on
each module -- both during MPI_INIT and dynamic process cases),
call the function to output the map. */
static int num_times_add_procs_called = 0;
++num_times_add_procs_called;
if (0 == (num_times_add_procs_called %
mca_btl_usnic_component.num_modules)) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_connectivity_map();
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
fail:
/* If we get here, it means something went terribly wrong. Scorch
the earth: destroy all endpoints and say that nothing was
reachable. */
for (size_t i = 0; i < nprocs; ++i) {
if (NULL != endpoints[i]) {
OBJ_RELEASE(endpoints[i]);
endpoints[i] = NULL;
}
}
return rc;
}
/*
* Delete the proc as reachable from this module. If there are
* multiple usnic modules in a process, we'll come through here
* multiple times to remove each proc. The OBJ reference counts
* will make all the details work out.
*/
static int usnic_del_procs(struct mca_btl_base_module_t *base_module,
size_t nprocs,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
struct opal_proc_t **procs,
struct mca_btl_base_endpoint_t **peers)
{
size_t i, j;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module;
opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t *endpoint;
int index;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
module = (struct opal_btl_usnic_module_t *)base_module;
for (i = 0; i < nprocs; i++) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_proc_t* proc =
opal_btl_usnic_proc_lookup_ompi(procs[i]);
if (NULL != proc) {
/* find endpoint for this module */
for (j = 0; j < proc->proc_endpoint_count; ++j) {
endpoint = proc->proc_endpoints[j];
if (NULL != endpoint && endpoint->endpoint_module == module) {
/* This call to usnic_del_procs is actually an
* implicit ACK of every packet we have ever sent
* ***because it is only ever invoked after an
* OOB/grpcomm barrier (in MPI_COMM_DISCONNECT and
* MPI_FINALIZE)***, so call handle_ack (via
* flush_endpoint) to do all the ACK processing
* and release all the data that needs
* releasing. */
if (!ENDPOINT_DRAINED(endpoint)) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_flush_endpoint(endpoint);
}
/* We're all done with this endpoint */
OBJ_RELEASE(endpoint);
break; /* done once we found match */
}
}
/* remove proc from this module, and decrement its refcount */
for (index = 0; index < module->all_procs.size; ++index) {
if (opal_pointer_array_get_item(&module->all_procs, index) ==
proc) {
OBJ_RELEASE(proc);
opal_pointer_array_set_item(&module->all_procs, index,
NULL);
break;
}
}
}
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
}
/*
* Let the PML register a callback function with me
*/
static int usnic_register_pml_err_cb(struct mca_btl_base_module_t* btl,
mca_btl_base_module_error_cb_fn_t cbfunc)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module = (opal_btl_usnic_module_t*) btl;
module->pml_error_callback = cbfunc;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
}
/**
* Allocate control messages or eager frags if BTL does not have
* INPLACE flag. To be clear: max it will ever alloc is eager_limit.
* THEREFORE: eager_limit is the max that ALLOC must always be able to
* alloc.
* --> Contraction in the btl.h documentation.
*/
static mca_btl_base_descriptor_t*
usnic_alloc(struct mca_btl_base_module_t* btl,
struct mca_btl_base_endpoint_t* endpoint,
uint8_t order,
size_t size,
uint32_t flags)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_send_frag_t *frag;
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module = (opal_btl_usnic_module_t*) btl;
mca_btl_base_descriptor_t *desc;
/* small is easy, just allocate a small segment */
if (OPAL_LIKELY(size <= module->max_frag_payload)) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_small_send_frag_t *sfrag;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sfrag = opal_btl_usnic_small_send_frag_alloc(module);
if (NULL == sfrag) {
return NULL;
}
frag = &sfrag->ssf_base;
/* between MTU and eager limit, we need to allocate a buffer
* which can hold the data. We will allocate a
* large fragment, and attach the buffer to it.
*/
} else {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_large_send_frag_t *lfrag;
/* truncate to eager_limit */
if (OPAL_UNLIKELY(size > module->super.btl_eager_limit)) {
size = module->super.btl_eager_limit;
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
lfrag = opal_btl_usnic_large_send_frag_alloc(module);
if (OPAL_UNLIKELY(NULL == lfrag)) {
return NULL;
}
frag = &lfrag->lsf_base;
assert(size > 0);
lfrag->lsf_buffer = malloc(size);
if (OPAL_UNLIKELY(NULL == lfrag->lsf_buffer)) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_frag_return(module, &lfrag->lsf_base.sf_base);
return NULL;
}
/* pointer to buffer for caller */
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
frag->sf_base.uf_base.des_local[0].seg_addr.pval = lfrag->lsf_buffer;
MSGDEBUG1_OUT("usnic_alloc: packing frag %p on the fly", (void *)frag);
lfrag->lsf_pack_on_the_fly = true;
}
#if MSGDEBUG2
opal_output(0, "usnic_alloc: %s frag=%p, size=%d, flags=0x%x\n",
(size <= module->max_frag_payload)?"small":"large",
(void *)frag, (int)size, flags);
#endif
/* set endpoint */
frag->sf_endpoint = endpoint;
/* set up descriptor */
desc = &frag->sf_base.uf_base;
desc->des_flags = flags;
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
desc->des_local[0].seg_len = size;
desc->des_local_count = 1;
return desc;
}
/**
* Return an allocated fragment
*
* Return the send fragment to the appropriate list
*/
static int usnic_free(struct mca_btl_base_module_t* btl,
mca_btl_base_descriptor_t* des)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_frag_t* frag = (opal_btl_usnic_frag_t*)des;
#if MSGDEBUG2
opal_output(0, "usnic_free: %p (%s)\n", (void*)frag,
usnic_frag_type(frag->uf_type));
#endif
/* calling free routine gives us ownership - we need to make sure
* the flag is set for lower layers.
*/
frag->uf_base.des_flags |= MCA_BTL_DES_FLAGS_BTL_OWNERSHIP;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_frag_return_cond((struct opal_btl_usnic_module_t *)btl,
frag);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
}
/*
* Notes from george:
*
* - BTL ALLOC: allocating control messages or eager frags if BTL
does not have INPLACE flag. To be clear: max it will ever alloc
is eager_limit. THEREFORE: eager_limit is the max that ALLOC
must always be able to alloc.
--> Contraction in the btl.h documentation.
*
* - BTL PREPARE SRC: max_send_size frags go through here. Can return
a smaller size than was asked for.
*
* - BTL PREPARE DEST: not used if you don't have PUT/GET
*
* - BTL SEND: will be used after ALLOC / PREPARE
*/
/* Responsible for handling "small" frags (reserve + *size <= max_frag_payload)
* in the same manner as btl_prepare_src. Must return a smaller amount than
* requested if the given convertor cannot process the entire (*size).
*/
static inline
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_send_frag_t *
prepare_src_small(
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
struct opal_btl_usnic_module_t* module,
struct mca_btl_base_endpoint_t* endpoint,
struct mca_mpool_base_registration_t* registration,
struct opal_convertor_t* convertor,
uint8_t order,
size_t reserve,
size_t* size,
uint32_t flags)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_send_frag_t *frag;
opal_btl_usnic_small_send_frag_t *sfrag;
size_t payload_len;
payload_len = *size + reserve;
assert(payload_len <= module->max_frag_payload); /* precondition */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sfrag = opal_btl_usnic_small_send_frag_alloc(module);
if (OPAL_UNLIKELY(NULL == sfrag)) {
return NULL;
}
frag = &sfrag->ssf_base;
/* In the case of a convertor, we will copy the data in now, since that is
* the cheapest way to discover how much we can actually send (since we know
* we will pack it anyway later). The alternative is to do all of the
* following:
* 1) clone_with_position(convertor) and see where the new position ends up
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
* actually being (see opal_btl_usnic_convertor_pack_peek). Otherwise we
* aren't fulfilling our contract w.r.t. (*size).
* 2) Add a bunch of branches checking for different cases, both here and in
* progress_sends
* 3) If we choose to defer the packing, we must clone the convertor because
* the PML owns it and might reuse it for another prepare_src call.
*
* Two convertor clones is likely to be at least as slow as just copying the
* data and might consume a similar amount of memory. Plus we still have to
* pack it later to send it.
*
* The reason we do not copy non-convertor buffer at this point is because
* we might still use INLINE for the send, and in that case we do not want
* to copy the data at all.
*/
if (OPAL_UNLIKELY(opal_convertor_need_buffers(convertor))) {
/* put user data just after end of 1st seg (upper layer header) */
assert(payload_len <= module->max_frag_payload);
usnic_convertor_pack_simple(
convertor,
(IOVBASE_TYPE*)(intptr_t)(frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[0].seg_addr.lval + reserve),
*size,
size);
payload_len = reserve + *size;
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
frag->sf_base.uf_base.des_local_count = 1;
/* PML will copy header into beginning of segment */
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[0].seg_len = payload_len;
} else {
opal_convertor_get_current_pointer(convertor,
&sfrag->ssf_base.sf_base.uf_local_seg[1].seg_addr.pval);
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
frag->sf_base.uf_base.des_local_count = 2;
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[0].seg_len = reserve;
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[1].seg_len = *size;
}
frag->sf_base.uf_base.des_flags = flags;
frag->sf_endpoint = endpoint;
return frag;
}
/* Packs data from the given large send frag into single new segment and
* returns a pointer to it. The packed data comes first from SG[0] (PML
* header) and then second from either SG[1] (if seg_addr is non-NULL) or from
* the convertor contained in the frag.
*
* The frag's bookkeeping data will be updated appropriately. */
static
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_chunk_segment_t *
pack_chunk_seg_from_frag(
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
struct opal_btl_usnic_module_t* module,
opal_btl_usnic_large_send_frag_t *lfrag)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_chunk_segment_t *seg;
uint8_t *copyptr;
size_t copylen;
size_t seg_space;
size_t max_data;
assert(NULL != lfrag);
/* never should be attempting to pack if we've already packed everything */
assert(lfrag->lsf_pack_bytes_left > 0);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
seg = opal_btl_usnic_chunk_segment_alloc(module);
if (OPAL_UNLIKELY(NULL == seg)) {
/* TODO look at ways to deal with this case more gracefully, possibly as
* part of capping the overall BTL memory consumption. Watch out for
* possible MPI-layer deadlock. */
BTL_ERROR(("chunk segment allocation error"));
abort(); /* XXX */
}
seg_space = module->max_chunk_payload;
copyptr = seg->ss_base.us_payload.raw;
/* Keep copying in as long as we have space, there is data to be copied, and
* we aren't using a convertor (SG[1] will be NULL if we have a convertor).
*/
while (seg_space > 0 &&
lfrag->lsf_pack_bytes_left > 0 &&
NULL != lfrag->lsf_cur_ptr) {
if (seg_space > lfrag->lsf_bytes_left_in_sge) {
copylen = lfrag->lsf_bytes_left_in_sge;
} else {
copylen = seg_space;
}
memcpy(copyptr, lfrag->lsf_cur_ptr, copylen);
seg_space -= copylen;
copyptr += copylen;
lfrag->lsf_bytes_left_in_sge -= copylen;
lfrag->lsf_pack_bytes_left -= copylen;
if (lfrag->lsf_bytes_left_in_sge > 0) {
lfrag->lsf_cur_ptr += copylen;
} else {
++lfrag->lsf_cur_sge;
lfrag->lsf_cur_ptr =
lfrag->lsf_des_src[lfrag->lsf_cur_sge].seg_addr.pval;
lfrag->lsf_bytes_left_in_sge =
lfrag->lsf_des_src[lfrag->lsf_cur_sge].seg_len;
}
}
if (seg_space > 0 && lfrag->lsf_pack_bytes_left > 0) {
/* the remaining bytes come from a convertor; pack using it */
assert(NULL == lfrag->lsf_cur_ptr);
assert(1 == lfrag->lsf_cur_sge);
copylen = lfrag->lsf_pack_bytes_left;
if (copylen > seg_space) {
copylen = seg_space;
}
usnic_convertor_pack_simple(&lfrag->lsf_base.sf_convertor, copyptr,
copylen, &max_data);
seg_space -= max_data;
lfrag->lsf_bytes_left_in_sge -= max_data;
lfrag->lsf_pack_bytes_left -= max_data;
}
MSGDEBUG1_OUT("%s: packed seg=%p, frag=%p, payload=%zd\n",
__func__, (void *)seg, (void *)lfrag,
(module->max_chunk_payload - seg_space));
assert(lfrag->lsf_cur_sge <= 2);
assert(seg_space < module->max_chunk_payload); /* must make progress */
seg->ss_parent_frag = &lfrag->lsf_base;
seg->ss_base.us_sg_entry[0].length = module->max_chunk_payload - seg_space;
return seg;
}
static
void *
pack_chunk_seg_chain_with_reserve(
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
struct opal_btl_usnic_module_t* module,
opal_btl_usnic_large_send_frag_t *lfrag,
size_t reserve_len,
opal_convertor_t *convertor,
size_t max_convertor_bytes,
size_t *convertor_bytes_packed)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_chunk_segment_t *seg;
void *ret_ptr = NULL;
int n_segs;
uint8_t *copyptr;
size_t copylen;
size_t seg_space;
size_t max_data;
bool first_pass;
assert(NULL != lfrag);
assert(NULL != convertor_bytes_packed);
n_segs = 0;
*convertor_bytes_packed = 0;
first_pass = true;
while (*convertor_bytes_packed < max_convertor_bytes ||
first_pass) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
seg = opal_btl_usnic_chunk_segment_alloc(module);
if (OPAL_UNLIKELY(NULL == seg)) {
BTL_ERROR(("chunk segment allocation error"));
abort(); /* XXX */
}
++n_segs;
seg_space = module->max_chunk_payload;
copyptr = seg->ss_base.us_payload.raw;
if (first_pass && reserve_len > 0) {
/* logic could accommodate >max, but currently doesn't */
assert(reserve_len <= module->max_chunk_payload);
ret_ptr = copyptr;
seg_space -= reserve_len;
copyptr += reserve_len;
}
/* now pack any convertor data */
if (*convertor_bytes_packed < max_convertor_bytes && seg_space > 0) {
copylen = max_convertor_bytes - *convertor_bytes_packed;
if (copylen > seg_space) {
copylen = seg_space;
}
usnic_convertor_pack_simple(convertor, copyptr, copylen, &max_data);
seg_space -= max_data;
*convertor_bytes_packed += max_data;
/* If unable to pack any of the remaining bytes, release the
* most recently allocated segment and finish processing.
*/
if (seg_space == module->max_chunk_payload) {
assert(max_data == 0); /* only way this can happen */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_chunk_segment_return(module, seg);
break;
}
}
/* bozo checks */
assert(seg_space >= 0);
assert(seg_space < module->max_chunk_payload);
/* append segment of data to chain to send */
seg->ss_parent_frag = &lfrag->lsf_base;
seg->ss_base.us_sg_entry[0].length = module->max_chunk_payload - seg_space;
opal_list_append(&lfrag->lsf_seg_chain, &seg->ss_base.us_list.super);
#if MSGDEBUG1
opal_output(0, "%s: appending seg=%p, frag=%p, payload=%zd\n",
__func__, (void *)seg, (void *)lfrag,
(module->max_chunk_payload - seg_space));
#endif
first_pass = false;
}
return ret_ptr;
}
/* Responsible for handling "large" frags (reserve + *size > max_frag_payload)
* in the same manner as btl_prepare_src. Must return a smaller amount than
* requested if the given convertor cannot process the entire (*size).
*/
static
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_send_frag_t *
prepare_src_large(
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
struct opal_btl_usnic_module_t* module,
struct mca_btl_base_endpoint_t* endpoint,
struct mca_mpool_base_registration_t* registration,
struct opal_convertor_t* convertor,
uint8_t order,
size_t reserve,
size_t* size,
uint32_t flags)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_send_frag_t *frag;
opal_btl_usnic_large_send_frag_t *lfrag;
int rc;
/* Get holder for the msg */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
lfrag = opal_btl_usnic_large_send_frag_alloc(module);
if (OPAL_UNLIKELY(NULL == lfrag)) {
return NULL;
}
frag = &lfrag->lsf_base;
/* The header location goes in SG[0], payload in SG[1]. If we are using a
* convertor then SG[1].seg_len is accurate but seg_addr is NULL. */
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
frag->sf_base.uf_base.des_local_count = 2;
/* stash header location, PML will write here */
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[0].seg_addr.pval = &lfrag->lsf_ompi_header;
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[0].seg_len = reserve;
/* make sure upper header small enough */
assert(reserve <= sizeof(lfrag->lsf_ompi_header));
if (OPAL_UNLIKELY(opal_convertor_need_buffers(convertor))) {
/* threshold == -1 means always pack eagerly */
if (mca_btl_usnic_component.pack_lazy_threshold >= 0 &&
*size >= (size_t)mca_btl_usnic_component.pack_lazy_threshold) {
MSGDEBUG1_OUT("packing frag %p on the fly", (void *)frag);
lfrag->lsf_pack_on_the_fly = true;
/* tell the PML we will absorb as much as possible while still
* respecting indivisible element boundaries in the convertor */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
*size = opal_btl_usnic_convertor_pack_peek(convertor, *size);
/* Clone the convertor b/c we (the BTL) don't own it and the PML
* might mutate it after we return from this function. */
rc = opal_convertor_clone(convertor, &frag->sf_convertor,
/*copy_stack=*/true);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
if (OPAL_UNLIKELY(OPAL_SUCCESS != rc)) {
BTL_ERROR(("unexpected convertor clone error"));
abort(); /* XXX */
}
}
else {
/* pack everything in the convertor into a chain of segments now,
* leaving space for the PML header in the first segment */
lfrag->lsf_base.sf_base.uf_local_seg[0].seg_addr.pval =
pack_chunk_seg_chain_with_reserve(module, lfrag, reserve,
convertor, *size, size);
}
/* We set SG[1] to {NULL,bytes_packed} so that various calculations
* by both PML and this BTL will be correct. For example, the PML adds
* up the bytes in the descriptor segments to determine if an MPI-level
* request is complete or not. */
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[1].seg_addr.pval = NULL;
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[1].seg_len = *size;
} else {
/* convertor not needed, just save the payload pointer in SG[1] */
lfrag->lsf_pack_on_the_fly = true;
opal_convertor_get_current_pointer(convertor,
&frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[1].seg_addr.pval);
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[1].seg_len = *size;
}
frag->sf_base.uf_base.des_flags = flags;
frag->sf_endpoint = endpoint;
return frag;
}
/**
* Note the "user" data the PML wishes to communicate and return a descriptor
* that can be used for send or put. We create a frag (which is also a
* descriptor by virtue of its base class) and populate it with enough
* source information to complete a future send/put.
*
* We will create either a small send frag if < than an MTU, otherwise a large
* send frag. The convertor will be saved for deferred packing if the user
* buffer is noncontiguous. Otherwise it will be saved in one of the
* descriptor's SGEs.
*
* NOTE that the *only* reason this routine is allowed to return a size smaller
* than was requested is if the convertor cannot process the entire amount.
*/
static mca_btl_base_descriptor_t*
usnic_prepare_src(
struct mca_btl_base_module_t* base_module,
struct mca_btl_base_endpoint_t* endpoint,
struct mca_mpool_base_registration_t* registration,
struct opal_convertor_t* convertor,
uint8_t order,
size_t reserve,
size_t* size,
uint32_t flags)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module = (opal_btl_usnic_module_t*) base_module;
opal_btl_usnic_send_frag_t *frag;
uint32_t payload_len;
#if MSGDEBUG2
size_t osize = *size;
#endif
/* Do we need to check the connectivity? If enabled, we'll check
the connectivity at either first send to peer X or first ACK to
peer X. */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_check_connectivity(module, endpoint);
/*
* if total payload len fits in one MTU use small send, else large
*/
payload_len = *size + reserve;
if (payload_len <= module->max_frag_payload) {
frag = prepare_src_small(module, endpoint, registration, convertor,
order, reserve, size, flags);
} else {
frag = prepare_src_large(module, endpoint, registration, convertor,
order, reserve, size, flags);
}
#if MSGDEBUG2
opal_output(0, "prep_src: %s %s frag %p, size=%d+%u (was %u), conv=%p\n",
module->device->name,
(reserve + *size) <= module->max_frag_payload?"small":"large",
(void *)frag, (int)reserve, (unsigned)*size, (unsigned)osize,
(void *)convertor);
#if MSGDEBUG1
{
unsigned i;
mca_btl_base_descriptor_t *desc = &frag->sf_base.uf_base;
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
for (i=0; i<desc->des_local_count; ++i) {
opal_output(0, " %d: ptr:%p len:%d\n", i,
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
(void *)desc->des_local[i].seg_addr.pval,
desc->des_local[i].seg_len);
}
}
#endif
#endif
return &frag->sf_base.uf_base;
}
static mca_btl_base_descriptor_t*
usnic_prepare_dst(
struct mca_btl_base_module_t* base_module,
struct mca_btl_base_endpoint_t* endpoint,
struct mca_mpool_base_registration_t* registration,
struct opal_convertor_t* convertor,
uint8_t order,
size_t reserve,
size_t* size,
uint32_t flags)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_put_dest_frag_t *pfrag;
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module;
void *data_ptr;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
module = (opal_btl_usnic_module_t *)base_module;
/* allocate a fragment for this */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
pfrag = (opal_btl_usnic_put_dest_frag_t *)
opal_btl_usnic_put_dest_frag_alloc(module);
if (NULL == pfrag) {
return NULL;
}
/* find start of the data */
opal_convertor_get_current_pointer(convertor, (void **) &data_ptr);
/* make a seg entry pointing at data_ptr */
pfrag->uf_remote_seg[0].seg_addr.pval = data_ptr;
pfrag->uf_remote_seg[0].seg_len = *size;
pfrag->uf_base.order = order;
pfrag->uf_base.des_flags = flags;
#if MSGDEBUG2
opal_output(0, "prep_dst size=%d, addr=%p, pfrag=%p\n", (int)*size,
data_ptr, (void *)pfrag);
#endif
return &pfrag->uf_base;
}
/*
* Emulate an RDMA put. We'll send the remote address
* across to the other side so it will know where to put the data
*/
static int
usnic_put(
struct mca_btl_base_module_t *btl,
struct mca_btl_base_endpoint_t *endpoint,
struct mca_btl_base_descriptor_t *desc)
{
int rc;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_send_frag_t *frag;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
frag = (opal_btl_usnic_send_frag_t *)desc;
compute_sf_size(frag);
frag->sf_ack_bytes_left = frag->sf_size;
#if MSGDEBUG2
opal_output(0, "usnic_put, frag=%p, size=%d\n", (void *)frag,
(int)frag->sf_size);
#if MSGDEBUG1
{ unsigned i;
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
for (i=0; i<desc->des_local_count; ++i) {
opal_output(0, " %d: ptr:%p len:%d%s\n", i,
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
desc->des_local[i].seg_addr.pval,
desc->des_local[i].seg_len,
(i==0)?" (source)":"");
}
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
for (i=0; i<desc->des_remote_count; ++i) {
opal_output(0, " %d: ptr:%p len:%d%s\n", i,
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
desc->des_remote[i].seg_addr.pval,
desc->des_remote[i].seg_len,
(i==0)?" (dest)":"");
}
}
#endif
#endif
/* copy out address - why does he not use our provided holder? */
frag->sf_base.uf_remote_seg[0].seg_addr.pval = desc->des_remote->seg_addr.pval;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
rc = opal_btl_usnic_finish_put_or_send((opal_btl_usnic_module_t *)btl,
(opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t *)endpoint,
frag,
/*tag=*/MCA_BTL_NO_ORDER);
return rc;
}
static int usnic_finalize(struct mca_btl_base_module_t* btl)
{
int i;
int rc;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_module_t* module = (opal_btl_usnic_module_t*)btl;
if (module->device_async_event_active) {
opal_event_del(&(module->device_async_event));
module->device_async_event_active = false;
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_channel_finalize(module,
&module->mod_channels[USNIC_DATA_CHANNEL]);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_channel_finalize(module,
&module->mod_channels[USNIC_PRIORITY_CHANNEL]);
Move all usNIC stats to _stats.c|h and export them as MPI_T pvars. This commit moves all the module stats into their own struct so that the stats only need to appear as a single line in the module_t definition, and then moves all the logic for reporting the stats into btl_usnic_stats.c|h. Further, the stats are now exported as MPI_T_BIND_NO_OBJECT entities (i.e., not bound to any particular MPI handle), and are marked as READONLY and CONTINUOUS. They currently all default to verbose level 5 ("Application tuner / detailed", according to https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/MCAParamLevels). Most of the statistics are counters, but a small number are high watermark values. Due to how counters are reported via MPI_T, none of the counters are exported through MPI_T if the MCA param btl_usnic_stats_relative=1 (i.e., the module resets the stats back to zero at a given frequency). When MPI_T_pvar_handle_alloc() is invoked on any of these pvars, it will return a count that is equal to the number of active usnic BTL modules. The values returned for any given pvar (e.g., num_total_sends) are an array containing one value for each active usnic BTL module. The ordering of values in the array is both consistent across all usnic pvars and stable throughout a single job: array slot 0 corresponds to module X, array slot 1 corresponds to module Y, etc. Mapping which array slot corresponds to which underlying Linux usnic_X device works as follows: * The btl_usnic_devices MPI_T state pvar is associated with a btl_usnic_device MPI_T enum, and be obtained via MPI_T_pvar_get_info(). * If all usNIC pvars are of length N, the values [0,N) in the btl_usnic_device enum are associated with strings of the corresponding underlying Linux device. For exampe, to look up which Linux device is reported in all usNIC pvars' array slot 1, look up the int value 1 in the btl_usnic_devices enum. Its corresponding string value is underlying Linux device name (e.g., "usnic_1"). cmr=v1.7.4:subject="usnic BTL MPI_T pvars" This commit was SVN r29545.
2013-10-29 02:23:08 +04:00
/* Shutdown the stats on this module */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_stats_finalize(module);
/* Note that usnic_del_procs will have been called for *all* procs
by this point, so the module->all_endpoints list will be empty.
Destruct it. */
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&(module->all_endpoints));
/* _flush_endpoint should have emptied this list */
assert(opal_list_is_empty(&(module->pending_resend_segs)));
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&module->pending_resend_segs);
/* Similarly, empty the endpoints_that_need_acks list so that
endpoints don't still have an endpoint_ack_li item still in
use */
while (!opal_list_is_empty(&(module->endpoints_that_need_acks))) {
(void) opal_list_remove_first(&(module->endpoints_that_need_acks));
}
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&module->endpoints_that_need_acks);
/* Note that usnic_del_procs will have been called for *all* procs
by this point, so the module->all_procs list will be empty.
Destruct it. */
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&module->all_procs);
for (i = module->first_pool; i <= module->last_pool; ++i) {
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&module->module_recv_buffers[i]);
}
free(module->module_recv_buffers);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&module->ack_segs);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&module->endpoints_with_sends);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&module->small_send_frags);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&module->large_send_frags);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&module->put_dest_frags);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&module->chunk_segs);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&module->senders);
mca_mpool_base_module_destroy(module->super.btl_mpool);
/* destroy the PD after all the CQs and AHs have been destroyed, otherwise
* we get a minor leak in libusnic_verbs */
rc = ibv_dealloc_pd(module->pd);
if (rc) {
BTL_ERROR(("failed to ibv_dealloc_pd, err=%d (%s)", rc, strerror(rc)));
}
rc = ibv_close_device(module->device_context);
if (-1 == rc) {
BTL_ERROR(("failed to ibv_close_device"));
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
}
static void
usnic_do_resends(
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_send_segment_t *sseg;
opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t *endpoint;
struct opal_btl_usnic_channel_t *data_channel;
int ret;
data_channel = &module->mod_channels[USNIC_DATA_CHANNEL];
while (((size_t)data_channel->sd_wqe > 0) &&
!opal_list_is_empty(&module->pending_resend_segs)) {
/*
* If a segment is on the re-send list, it will not
* be in the retransmit hotel. Post the segment, then check it in.
*/
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sseg = (opal_btl_usnic_send_segment_t *)
opal_list_remove_first(&module->pending_resend_segs);
endpoint = sseg->ss_parent_frag->sf_endpoint;
/* clobber any stale piggy-backed ACK */
sseg->ss_base.us_btl_header->ack_present = 0;
/* Only post this segment if not already posted */
if (sseg->ss_send_posted == 0) {
/* resends are always standard segments */
sseg->ss_channel = USNIC_DATA_CHANNEL;
/* re-send the segment */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_post_segment(module, endpoint, sseg);
/* consume a send credit for this endpoint. May send us
* negative, oh well... This is because the completion routine
* always increments send credits, and we must balance.
* Alternative is to mark this as a retrans segment and check in
* completion, but this ugly way avoids extra checks in the
* critical path. And, really, respects the concept of send
* credits more.
*/
--endpoint->endpoint_send_credits;
Move all usNIC stats to _stats.c|h and export them as MPI_T pvars. This commit moves all the module stats into their own struct so that the stats only need to appear as a single line in the module_t definition, and then moves all the logic for reporting the stats into btl_usnic_stats.c|h. Further, the stats are now exported as MPI_T_BIND_NO_OBJECT entities (i.e., not bound to any particular MPI handle), and are marked as READONLY and CONTINUOUS. They currently all default to verbose level 5 ("Application tuner / detailed", according to https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/MCAParamLevels). Most of the statistics are counters, but a small number are high watermark values. Due to how counters are reported via MPI_T, none of the counters are exported through MPI_T if the MCA param btl_usnic_stats_relative=1 (i.e., the module resets the stats back to zero at a given frequency). When MPI_T_pvar_handle_alloc() is invoked on any of these pvars, it will return a count that is equal to the number of active usnic BTL modules. The values returned for any given pvar (e.g., num_total_sends) are an array containing one value for each active usnic BTL module. The ordering of values in the array is both consistent across all usnic pvars and stable throughout a single job: array slot 0 corresponds to module X, array slot 1 corresponds to module Y, etc. Mapping which array slot corresponds to which underlying Linux usnic_X device works as follows: * The btl_usnic_devices MPI_T state pvar is associated with a btl_usnic_device MPI_T enum, and be obtained via MPI_T_pvar_get_info(). * If all usNIC pvars are of length N, the values [0,N) in the btl_usnic_device enum are associated with strings of the corresponding underlying Linux device. For exampe, to look up which Linux device is reported in all usNIC pvars' array slot 1, look up the int value 1 in the btl_usnic_devices enum. Its corresponding string value is underlying Linux device name (e.g., "usnic_1"). cmr=v1.7.4:subject="usnic BTL MPI_T pvars" This commit was SVN r29545.
2013-10-29 02:23:08 +04:00
++module->stats.num_resends;
}
/* restart the retrans timer */
ret = opal_hotel_checkin(&endpoint->endpoint_hotel,
sseg, &sseg->ss_hotel_room);
if (OPAL_UNLIKELY(OPAL_SUCCESS != ret)) {
BTL_ERROR(("hotel checkin failed\n"));
abort(); /* should not be possible */
}
}
}
/* Given a large send frag (which is at the head of the given endpoint's send
* queue), generate a new segment, fill it with data, and
* endpoint_send_segment() it. Takes care of subsequent frag
* cleanup/bookkeeping (dequeue, descriptor callback, etc.) if this frag was
* completed by this segment.
*/
static void
usnic_handle_large_send(
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module,
opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t *endpoint,
opal_btl_usnic_send_frag_t *frag)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_large_send_frag_t *lfrag;
opal_btl_usnic_btl_chunk_header_t *chp;
opal_btl_usnic_send_segment_t *sseg;
size_t payload_len;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
assert(frag->sf_base.uf_type == OPAL_BTL_USNIC_FRAG_LARGE_SEND);
lfrag = (opal_btl_usnic_large_send_frag_t *)frag;
if (lfrag->lsf_cur_offset == 0) {
/* assign a fragment ID */
do {
lfrag->lsf_frag_id = endpoint->endpoint_next_frag_id++;
} while (lfrag->lsf_frag_id == 0);
}
if (lfrag->lsf_pack_on_the_fly) {
assert(opal_list_is_empty(&lfrag->lsf_seg_chain));
/* just pack a single chunk segment and put it on the list */
sseg = pack_chunk_seg_from_frag(module, lfrag);
} else {
/* data was pre-packed in prepare_src */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sseg = (opal_btl_usnic_send_segment_t *)
opal_list_remove_first(&lfrag->lsf_seg_chain);
}
assert(NULL != sseg);
payload_len = sseg->ss_base.us_sg_entry[0].length;
assert(payload_len > 0); /* must have made progress */
assert(payload_len <= module->max_chunk_payload);
assert(lfrag->lsf_bytes_left >= payload_len);
/* set actual packet length for verbs */
assert(1 == sseg->ss_send_desc.num_sge); /* chunk invariant */
sseg->ss_base.us_sg_entry[0].length =
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_btl_chunk_header_t) + payload_len;
lfrag->lsf_bytes_left -= payload_len;
/* fill in the chunk's BTL header with frag info */
chp = sseg->ss_base.us_btl_chunk_header;
chp->ch_frag_id = lfrag->lsf_frag_id;
chp->ch_frag_size = lfrag->lsf_base.sf_size;
chp->ch_frag_offset = lfrag->lsf_cur_offset;
chp->ch_hdr.tag = lfrag->lsf_tag;
/* payload length into the header*/
sseg->ss_base.us_btl_header->payload_len = payload_len;
/* do the send */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_send_segment(module, sseg);
/* do fragment bookkeeping */
lfrag->lsf_cur_offset += payload_len;
#if MSGDEBUG1
opal_output(0, "%s: payload_len=%zd, bytes_left=%zd on_the_fly=%s\n",
__func__, payload_len, lfrag->lsf_bytes_left,
lfrag->lsf_pack_on_the_fly?"true":"false");
#endif
/* done with fragment? */
if (lfrag->lsf_bytes_left == 0) {
/* remove this frag from sending list now because upper layer may
* decide to put it on some other list in the callback
*/
opal_list_remove_item(&endpoint->endpoint_frag_send_queue,
&frag->sf_base.uf_base.super.super);
/* only callback now if this was not a PUT and we own the fragment,
* otherwise we need to wait until last byte is ACKed
*/
if (frag->sf_base.uf_remote_seg[0].seg_addr.pval == NULL &&
(frag->sf_base.uf_base.des_flags &
MCA_BTL_DES_FLAGS_BTL_OWNERSHIP)) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
OPAL_BTL_USNIC_DO_SEND_FRAG_CB(module, frag, "large");
}
}
}
/*
* Progress the send engine.
* Should only ever be called from usnic_component_progress() to
* avoid re-entrancy issues.
*/
void
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_module_progress_sends(
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_send_frag_t *frag;
opal_btl_usnic_send_segment_t *sseg;
opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t *endpoint;
struct opal_btl_usnic_channel_t *data_channel;
struct opal_btl_usnic_channel_t *prio_channel;
/*
* Post all the sends that we can
* resends 1st priority
* ACKs 2nd priority
* new sends 3rd
*/
data_channel = &module->mod_channels[USNIC_DATA_CHANNEL];
prio_channel = &module->mod_channels[USNIC_PRIORITY_CHANNEL];
/*
* Handle all the retransmits we can
*/
if (OPAL_UNLIKELY(!opal_list_is_empty(&module->pending_resend_segs))) {
usnic_do_resends(module);
}
/*
* Keep sending as long as there are WQEs and something to do
*/
while (((size_t) data_channel->sd_wqe > 0) &&
!opal_list_is_empty(&module->endpoints_with_sends)) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_small_send_frag_t *sfrag;
size_t payload_len;
/*
* Grab the first endpoint with a pending send. Presence on this
* list means there is a fragment with data ready to go and
* the endpoint's send window is open, and the endpoint has send
* credits.
*/
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
endpoint = (opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t *)
opal_list_get_first(&module->endpoints_with_sends);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
frag = (opal_btl_usnic_send_frag_t *)
opal_list_get_first(&endpoint->endpoint_frag_send_queue);
/*
* small send? (fragment fits in one segment)
* Send ptr and length will be in uf_local_seg[0]
*/
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
if (frag->sf_base.uf_type == OPAL_BTL_USNIC_FRAG_SMALL_SEND) {
/* remove this frag from sending list now because upper layer may
* decide to put it on some other list in the callback
*/
opal_list_remove_item(&endpoint->endpoint_frag_send_queue,
&frag->sf_base.uf_base.super.super);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sfrag = (opal_btl_usnic_small_send_frag_t *)frag;
sseg = &sfrag->ssf_segment;
/* get payload len from segment */
payload_len = sfrag->ssf_base.sf_size;
sseg->ss_base.us_btl_header->payload_len = payload_len;
#if MSGDEBUG1
opal_output(0, "progress send small, frag=%p, ptr=%p, payload=%zd, len=%"PRIu32", ep=%p, tag=%d\n",
(void *)frag,
(void *)sseg->ss_base.us_sg_entry[0].addr, payload_len,
sseg->ss_base.us_sg_entry[0].length,
(void *)frag->sf_endpoint,
sseg->ss_base.us_btl_header->tag);
#endif
/* post the send */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_send_segment(module, sseg);
/* don't do callback yet if this is a put */
if (frag->sf_base.uf_remote_seg[0].seg_addr.pval == NULL) {
/* we have copied the data, perform a callback if
* we own the fragment and callback is requested.
* If we don't own the fragment, we cannot callback yet
* because we are not done with the segment inside.
* (ACK not received yet)
*/
if ((frag->sf_base.uf_base.des_flags &
(MCA_BTL_DES_SEND_ALWAYS_CALLBACK |
MCA_BTL_DES_FLAGS_BTL_OWNERSHIP)) ==
(MCA_BTL_DES_SEND_ALWAYS_CALLBACK |
MCA_BTL_DES_FLAGS_BTL_OWNERSHIP)) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
OPAL_BTL_USNIC_DO_SEND_FRAG_CB(module, frag, "small");
}
}
/* Large sends... */
} else {
usnic_handle_large_send(module, endpoint, frag);
}
/* If no more sends or endpoint send window is closed,
* or no more send credits, remove from send list
*/
if (opal_list_is_empty(&endpoint->endpoint_frag_send_queue) ||
endpoint->endpoint_send_credits <= 0 ||
!WINDOW_OPEN(endpoint)) {
opal_list_remove_item(&module->endpoints_with_sends,
&endpoint->super);
endpoint->endpoint_ready_to_send = false;
}
}
/*
* Handle any ACKs that need to be sent
*/
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
endpoint = opal_btl_usnic_get_first_endpoint_needing_ack(module);
while (((size_t)prio_channel->sd_wqe) > 0 && endpoint != NULL) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t *next_endpoint;
/* get next in list */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
next_endpoint = opal_btl_usnic_get_next_endpoint_needing_ack(endpoint);
/* Is it time to send ACK? */
if (endpoint->endpoint_acktime == 0 ||
endpoint->endpoint_acktime <= get_nsec()) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_ack_send(module, endpoint);
opal_btl_usnic_remove_from_endpoints_needing_ack(endpoint);
}
endpoint = next_endpoint;
}
}
/*
* Initiate a send.
*
* Send completion callbacks can be done from a few different places.
*
* If this is a send from a fragment we do not own, we always have
* to wait for the last ACK of the fragment, because we cannot allow
* the fragment to be re-used until we know we have no more retransmits to do.
*
* If this is a send from a fragment we own, and we know we have copied the
* data from the user's buffer, we can perform the callback immediately
* (or possibly not at all, simply returning "1" to indicate completion).
*
* If this is a send from a fragment we own and we have not yet copied out
* all the data (as is the case in a large send) then we defer the callback
* until the last of the data has been copied out by routines called
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
* from opal_btl_usnic_progress_sends()
*/
static int
usnic_send(
struct mca_btl_base_module_t* base_module,
struct mca_btl_base_endpoint_t* base_endpoint,
struct mca_btl_base_descriptor_t* descriptor,
mca_btl_base_tag_t tag)
{
int rc;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_send_frag_t *frag;
opal_btl_usnic_small_send_frag_t *sfrag;
opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t *endpoint;
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module;
opal_btl_usnic_send_segment_t *sseg;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
endpoint = (opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_t *)base_endpoint;
module = (opal_btl_usnic_module_t *)base_module;
frag = (opal_btl_usnic_send_frag_t*) descriptor;
assert(frag->sf_endpoint == endpoint);
frag->sf_base.uf_remote_seg[0].seg_addr.pval = NULL; /* not a PUT */
compute_sf_size(frag);
frag->sf_ack_bytes_left = frag->sf_size;
#if MSGDEBUG2
opal_output(0, "usnic_send: frag=%p, endpoint=%p, tag=%d, sf_size=%d\n",
(void *)frag, (void *)endpoint,
tag, (int)frag->sf_size);
#if MSGDEBUG1
{ unsigned i;
opal_output(0, " descriptor->des_flags=0x%x\n", descriptor->des_flags);
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
for (i=0; i<descriptor->des_local_count; ++i) {
opal_output(0, " %d: ptr:%p len:%d\n", i,
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
descriptor->des_local[i].seg_addr.pval,
descriptor->des_local[i].seg_len);
}
}
#endif
#endif
/*
* If this fragment is small enough to inline,
* and we have enough send WQEs,
* then inline and fastpath it
*/
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
if (frag->sf_base.uf_type == OPAL_BTL_USNIC_FRAG_SMALL_SEND &&
frag->sf_ack_bytes_left < module->max_tiny_payload &&
WINDOW_OPEN(endpoint) &&
(module->mod_channels[USNIC_PRIORITY_CHANNEL].sd_wqe >=
module->mod_channels[USNIC_PRIORITY_CHANNEL].fastsend_wqe_thresh)) {
size_t payload_len;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sfrag = (opal_btl_usnic_small_send_frag_t *)frag;
sseg = &sfrag->ssf_segment;
payload_len = frag->sf_ack_bytes_left;
sseg->ss_base.us_btl_header->payload_len = payload_len;
/* fix up verbs SG entries */
sseg->ss_base.us_sg_entry[0].length =
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_btl_header_t) +
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[0].seg_len;
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
if (frag->sf_base.uf_base.des_local_count > 1) {
/* only briefly, we will set it back to 1 before release */
sseg->ss_send_desc.num_sge = 2;
sseg->ss_base.us_sg_entry[1].addr =
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[1].seg_addr.lval,
sseg->ss_base.us_sg_entry[1].length =
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[1].seg_len;
} else {
sseg->ss_send_desc.num_sge = 1;
}
sseg->ss_send_desc.send_flags |= IBV_SEND_INLINE;
sseg->ss_channel = USNIC_PRIORITY_CHANNEL;
sseg->ss_base.us_btl_header->tag = tag;
#if MSGDEBUG1
opal_output(0, "INLINE send, sseg=%p", (void *)sseg);
#endif
/* post the segment now */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_endpoint_send_segment(module, sseg);
/* make a copy of the data for retrans */
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
if (frag->sf_base.uf_base.des_local_count > 1) {
memcpy(((char *)(intptr_t)frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[0].seg_addr.lval +
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[0].seg_len),
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[1].seg_addr.pval,
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[1].seg_len);
/* update 1st segment length */
Per RFC: Remove des_src and des_dst members from the mca_btl_base_segment_t and replace them with des_local and des_remote This change also updates the BTL version to 3.0.0. This commit does not represent the final version of BTL 3.0.0. More changes are coming. In making this change I updated all of the BTLs as well as BTL user's to use the new structure members. Please evaluate your component to ensure the changes are correct. RFC text: This is the first of several BTL interface changes I am proposing for the 1.9/2.0 release series. What: Change naming of btl descriptor members. I propose we change des_src and des_dst (and their associated counts) to be des_local and des_remote. For receive callbacks the des_local member will be used to communicate the segment information to the callback. The proposed change will include updating all of the doxygen in btl.h as well as updating all BTLs and BTL users to use the new naming scheme. Why: My btl usage makes use of both put and get operations on the same descriptor. With the current naming scheme I need to ensure that there is consistency beteen the segments described in des_src and des_dst depending on whether a put or get operation is executed. Additionally, the current naming prevents BTLs that do not require prepare/RMA matched operations (do not set MCA_BTL_FLAGS_RDMA_MATCHED) from executing multiple simultaneous put AND get operations. At the moment the descriptor can only be used with one or the other. The naming change makes it easier for BTL users to setup/modify descriptors for RMA operations as the local segment and remote segment are always in the same member field. The only issue I forsee with this change is that it will require a little more work to move BTL fixes to the 1.8 release series. This commit was SVN r32196.
2014-07-10 20:31:15 +04:00
frag->sf_base.uf_base.des_local_count = 1;
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[0].seg_len +=
frag->sf_base.uf_local_seg[1].seg_len;
/* set up VERBS SG list */
/* this maintains invariant that num_sge=1 */
sseg->ss_send_desc.num_sge = 1;
sseg->ss_base.us_sg_entry[0].length =
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_btl_header_t) + frag->sf_size;
}
/* If we own the frag and callback was requested, callback now,
* else just return 1 to show completion.
* If we don't own the frag, need to wait for ACK before
* performing callback on the frag
*/
if (descriptor->des_flags & MCA_BTL_DES_FLAGS_BTL_OWNERSHIP) {
if (descriptor->des_flags & MCA_BTL_DES_SEND_ALWAYS_CALLBACK) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
OPAL_BTL_USNIC_DO_SEND_FRAG_CB(module, frag, "immediate small");
rc = 0;
} else {
#if MSGDEBUG1
opal_output(0, "skipping callback for frag %p, returning 1\n", (void *)frag);
#endif
rc = 1;
++module->stats.pml_send_callbacks; /* returning "1" is an implicit CB */
}
} else {
#if MSGDEBUG1
opal_output(0, "don't own descriptor, defer callback for frag %p\n", (void *)frag);
#endif
descriptor->des_flags |= MCA_BTL_DES_SEND_ALWAYS_CALLBACK;
rc = 0;
}
} else {
/*
* We move this off to another function because having it inside
* this function seems to add a little latency, likely due to inlines
* making the function too big. In fact, the routine had to go to
* another file entirely, else the compiler tried to be helpful
* and inline all by itself.
*/
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
rc = opal_btl_usnic_finish_put_or_send(module, endpoint, frag, tag);
/* FIXME can we clarify flag set/clear ordering? */
frag->sf_base.uf_base.des_flags |= MCA_BTL_DES_SEND_ALWAYS_CALLBACK;
}
++module->stats.pml_module_sends;
return rc;
}
#if 0
/*
* Initiate an immediate send
*/
static int usnic_sendi(struct mca_btl_base_module_t* btl,
struct mca_btl_base_endpoint_t* endpoint,
struct opal_convertor_t* convertor,
void* header,
size_t header_size,
size_t payload_size,
uint8_t order,
uint32_t flags,
mca_btl_base_tag_t tag,
mca_btl_base_descriptor_t** descriptor)
{
/* JMS write me */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_ERROR;
}
#endif
/*
* RDMA Memory Pool (de)register callbacks
*/
static int usnic_reg_mr(void* reg_data, void* base, size_t size,
mca_mpool_base_registration_t* reg)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_module_t* mod = (opal_btl_usnic_module_t*)reg_data;
opal_btl_usnic_reg_t* ud_reg = (opal_btl_usnic_reg_t*)reg;
ud_reg->mr = ibv_reg_mr(mod->pd, base, size, IBV_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE |
IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE | IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ);
if (NULL == ud_reg->mr) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_ERR_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
}
static int usnic_dereg_mr(void* reg_data,
mca_mpool_base_registration_t* reg)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_reg_t* ud_reg = (opal_btl_usnic_reg_t*)reg;
if (ud_reg->mr != NULL) {
if (ibv_dereg_mr(ud_reg->mr)) {
opal_output(0, "%s: error unpinning UD memory mr=%p: %s\n",
__func__, (void*) ud_reg->mr, strerror(errno));
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_ERROR;
}
}
ud_reg->mr = NULL;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
}
/*
* Called back by libevent if an async event occurs on the device
*/
static void module_async_event_callback(int fd, short flags, void *arg)
{
bool got_event = false;
bool fatal = false;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module = (opal_btl_usnic_module_t*) arg;
struct ibv_async_event event;
/* Get the async event */
if (0 != ibv_get_async_event(module->device_context, &event)) {
/* This shouldn't happen. If it does, treat this as a fatal
error. */
fatal = true;
} else {
got_event = true;
}
/* Process the event */
if (got_event) {
switch (event.event_type) {
case IBV_EVENT_PORT_ACTIVE:
/* This event should never happen, because OMPI will
ignore ports that are down, and we should only get this
event if a port *was* down and is now *up*. But if we
ever do get it, it should be a harmless event -- just
ignore it. */
opal_output_verbose(10, USNIC_OUT,
"btl:usnic: got IBV_EVENT_PORT_ACTIVE on %s:%d",
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->port_num);
break;
case IBV_EVENT_QP_FATAL:
case IBV_EVENT_PORT_ERR:
#if HAVE_DECL_IBV_EVENT_GID_CHANGE
case IBV_EVENT_GID_CHANGE:
#endif
default:
/* For the moment, these are the only other cases
usnic_verbs.ko will report to us. However, they're
only listed here for completeness. We currently abort
if any async event other than PORT_ACTIVE occurs. */
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt", "async event",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->if_name,
ibv_event_type_str(event.event_type),
event.event_type);
fatal = true;
break;
}
/* Ack the event back to verbs */
ibv_ack_async_event(&event);
}
/* If this is fatal, invoke the upper layer error handler to abort
the job */
if (fatal) {
opal_btl_usnic_exit(module);
/* Does not return */
}
}
/*
* Create a single UD queue pair.
*/
static int
init_qp(
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_module_t* module,
struct opal_btl_usnic_channel_t *channel)
{
struct ibv_qp_attr qp_attr;
struct ibv_qp_init_attr qp_init_attr;
/* memset to both silence valgrind warnings (since the attr struct
ends up getting written down an fd to the kernel) and actually
zero out all the fields that we don't care about / want to be
logically false. */
memset(&qp_init_attr, 0, sizeof(qp_init_attr));
qp_init_attr.send_cq = channel->cq;
qp_init_attr.recv_cq = channel->cq;
qp_init_attr.cap.max_send_wr = channel->chan_sd_num;
qp_init_attr.cap.max_recv_wr = channel->chan_rd_num;
qp_init_attr.cap.max_send_sge = 1;
qp_init_attr.cap.max_recv_sge = 1;
qp_init_attr.qp_type = IBV_QPT_UD;
/* We did math up in component_init() to know that there should be
enough QPs available. So if create_qp fails, then either the
memlock limits are too low, or something other than this MPI
job is consuming QPs. */
channel->qp = ibv_create_qp(module->pd, &qp_init_attr);
if (NULL == channel->qp) {
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt", "create ibv resource failed",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->if_name,
"ibv_create_qp()", __FILE__, __LINE__,
"Failed to create a usNIC queue pair");
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_ERR_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
}
/* memset to both silence valgrind warnings (since the attr struct
ends up getting written down an fd to the kernel) and actually
zero out all the fields that we don't care about / want to be
logically false. */
memset(&qp_attr, 0, sizeof(qp_attr));
qp_attr.qp_state = IBV_QPS_INIT;
qp_attr.port_num = module->port_num;
if (ibv_modify_qp(channel->qp, &qp_attr,
IBV_QP_STATE | IBV_QP_PORT)) {
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt", "ibv API failed",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->if_name,
"ibv_modify_qp()", __FILE__, __LINE__,
"Failed to modify an existing queue pair");
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
}
/* Find the max inline size */
memset(&qp_attr, 0, sizeof(qp_attr));
memset(&qp_init_attr, 0, sizeof(qp_init_attr));
if (ibv_query_qp(channel->qp, &qp_attr, IBV_QP_CAP,
&qp_init_attr) != 0) {
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt", "ibv API failed",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->if_name,
"ibv_query_qp()", __FILE__, __LINE__,
"Failed to query an existing queue pair");
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE;
}
/* only grab this once */
if (channel == &module->mod_channels[USNIC_DATA_CHANNEL]) {
module->qp_max_inline = qp_attr.cap.max_inline_data;
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
static int move_qp_to_rtr(opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module,
struct opal_btl_usnic_channel_t *channel)
{
struct ibv_qp_attr qp_attr;
memset(&qp_attr, 0, sizeof(qp_attr));
qp_attr.qp_state = IBV_QPS_RTR;
if (ibv_modify_qp(channel->qp, &qp_attr, IBV_QP_STATE)) {
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt", "ibv API failed",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->if_name,
"ibv_modify_qp", __FILE__, __LINE__,
"Failed to move QP to RTR state");
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_ERROR;
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
static int move_qp_to_rts(opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module,
struct opal_btl_usnic_channel_t *channel)
{
struct ibv_qp_attr qp_attr;
memset(&qp_attr, 0, sizeof(qp_attr));
qp_attr.qp_state = IBV_QPS_RTS;
if (ibv_modify_qp(channel->qp, &qp_attr, IBV_QP_STATE)) {
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt", "ibv API failed",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->if_name,
"ibv_modify_qp", __FILE__, __LINE__,
"Failed to move QP to RTS state");
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_ERROR;
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
}
/*
* finalize channel - release all associated resources
*/
static void
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_channel_finalize(
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module,
struct opal_btl_usnic_channel_t *channel)
{
if (NULL != channel->qp) {
ibv_destroy_qp(channel->qp);
channel->qp = NULL;
}
/* destroy CQ if created */
if (NULL != channel->cq) {
ibv_destroy_cq(channel->cq);
channel->cq = NULL;
}
/* gets set right after constructor called, lets us know recv_segs
* have been constructed. Make sure to wait until queues destroyed to destroy
* the recv_segs
*/
if (channel->recv_segs.ctx == module) {
assert(NULL == channel->qp && NULL == channel->cq);
OBJ_DESTRUCT(&channel->recv_segs);
}
}
/*
* Initialize a channel
*/
static int
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_channel_init(
opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module,
struct opal_btl_usnic_channel_t *channel,
int index,
int mtu,
int rd_num,
int sd_num)
{
struct ibv_context *ctx;
uint32_t segsize;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_recv_segment_t *rseg;
ompi_free_list_item_t* item;
struct ibv_recv_wr* bad_wr;
int i;
int rc;
ctx = module->device_context;
channel->chan_mtu = mtu;
channel->chan_rd_num = rd_num;
channel->chan_sd_num = sd_num;
channel->chan_index = index;
channel->chan_deferred_recv = NULL;
channel->chan_error = false;
channel->sd_wqe = sd_num;
channel->fastsend_wqe_thresh = sd_num - 10;
/* We did math up in component_init() to know that there should be
enough CQs available. So if create_cq fails, then either the
memlock limits are too low, or something other than this MPI
job is consuming CQs. */
channel->cq = ibv_create_cq(ctx, module->cq_num, NULL, NULL, 0);
if (NULL == channel->cq) {
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt", "create ibv resource failed",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->if_name,
"ibv_create_cq()", __FILE__, __LINE__,
"Failed to create a usNIC completion queue");
goto error;
}
/* Set up the QP for this channel */
rc = init_qp(module, channel);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
if (OPAL_SUCCESS != rc) {
goto error;
}
/*
* Initialize pool of receive segments. round MTU up to cache line size
* so that each segment is guaranteed to start on a cache line boundary
*/
segsize = (mtu + opal_cache_line_size - 1) & ~(opal_cache_line_size - 1);
OBJ_CONSTRUCT(&channel->recv_segs, ompi_free_list_t);
rc = ompi_free_list_init_new(&channel->recv_segs,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_recv_segment_t),
opal_cache_line_size,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
OBJ_CLASS(opal_btl_usnic_recv_segment_t),
segsize,
opal_cache_line_size,
rd_num,
rd_num,
rd_num,
module->super.btl_mpool);
channel->recv_segs.ctx = module; /* must come after ompi_free_list_init_new,
otherwise ctx gets clobbered */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
if (OPAL_SUCCESS != rc) {
goto error;
}
/* Post receive descriptors */
for (i = 0; i < rd_num; i++) {
OMPI_FREE_LIST_GET_MT(&channel->recv_segs, item);
assert(NULL != item);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
rseg = (opal_btl_usnic_recv_segment_t*)item;
if (NULL == rseg) {
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt",
"internal error during init",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->if_name,
"get freelist buffer()", __FILE__, __LINE__,
"Failed to get receive buffer from freelist");
abort(); /* this is impossible */
}
/* cannot find length from constructor, set it now */
rseg->rs_base.us_sg_entry[0].length = mtu;
rseg->rs_recv_desc.next = NULL;
if (ibv_post_recv(channel->qp, &rseg->rs_recv_desc, &bad_wr)) {
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt", "ibv API failed",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->if_name,
"ibv_post_recv", __FILE__, __LINE__,
"Failed to post receive buffer");
goto error;
}
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
if (OPAL_SUCCESS != move_qp_to_rtr(module, channel)) {
goto error;
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
if (OPAL_SUCCESS != move_qp_to_rts(module, channel)) {
goto error;
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
error:
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_channel_finalize(module, channel);
return OPAL_ERROR;
}
/*
* generate initial send sequence number
*/
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
static opal_btl_usnic_seq_t
get_initial_seq_no(void)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_seq_t isn;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
isn = (opal_btl_usnic_seq_t)opal_rand(&opal_btl_usnic_rand_buff);
return isn;
}
/*
* Initialize the btl module by allocating a protection domain,
* memory pool, priority and data channels, and free lists
*/
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
int opal_btl_usnic_module_init(opal_btl_usnic_module_t *module)
{
int rc;
int i;
struct mca_mpool_base_resources_t mpool_resources;
struct ibv_context *ctx = module->device_context;
uint32_t ack_segment_len;
uint32_t segsize;
#if OPAL_HAVE_HWLOC
/* If this process is bound to a single NUMA locality, calculate
its NUMA distance from this usNIC device */
if (mca_btl_usnic_component.want_numa_device_assignment) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_hwloc_distance(module);
} else {
opal_output_verbose(5, USNIC_OUT,
"btl:usnic: not sorting devices by NUMA distance (MCA btl_usnic_want_numa_device_assignment)");
}
#else
opal_output_verbose(5, USNIC_OUT,
"btl:usnic: not sorting devices by NUMA distance (topology support not included)");
#endif
/* Setup a connectivity listener */
if (mca_btl_usnic_component.connectivity_enabled) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
rc = opal_btl_usnic_connectivity_listen(module);
if (OPAL_SUCCESS != rc) {
OPAL_ERROR_LOG(rc);
ABORT("Failed to notify connectivity agent to listen");
}
} else {
/* If we're not doing a connectivity check, just set the port
to 0 */
module->local_addr.connectivity_udp_port = 0;
}
/* Setup the pointer array for the procs that will be used by this
module */
OBJ_CONSTRUCT(&module->all_procs, opal_pointer_array_t);
opal_pointer_array_init(&module->all_procs, ompi_process_info.num_procs,
INT_MAX, 32);
/* Get a PD */
module->pd = ibv_alloc_pd(ctx);
if (NULL == module->pd) {
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt", "ibv API failed",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->if_name,
"ibv_alloc_pd()", __FILE__, __LINE__,
"Failed to create a PD; is the usnic_verbs Linux kernel module loaded?");
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_ERROR;
}
/* Setup the mpool */
mpool_resources.reg_data = (void*)module;
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
mpool_resources.sizeof_reg = sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_reg_t);
mpool_resources.register_mem = usnic_reg_mr;
mpool_resources.deregister_mem = usnic_dereg_mr;
asprintf(&mpool_resources.pool_name, "usnic.%" PRIu64,
module->local_addr.gid.global.interface_id);
module->super.btl_mpool =
mca_mpool_base_module_create(mca_btl_usnic_component.usnic_mpool_name,
&module->super, &mpool_resources);
if (NULL == module->super.btl_mpool) {
opal_show_help("help-mpi-btl-usnic.txt", "ibv API failed",
true,
opal_process_info.nodename,
ibv_get_device_name(module->device),
module->if_name,
"create mpool", __FILE__, __LINE__,
"Failed to allocate registered memory; check Linux memlock limits");
goto dealloc_pd;
}
/* initialize data and priority channels */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
rc = opal_btl_usnic_channel_init(module,
&module->mod_channels[USNIC_PRIORITY_CHANNEL],
USNIC_PRIORITY_CHANNEL,
module->tiny_mtu, module->prio_rd_num, module->prio_sd_num);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) {
goto chan_destroy;
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
rc = opal_btl_usnic_channel_init(module,
&module->mod_channels[USNIC_DATA_CHANNEL],
USNIC_DATA_CHANNEL,
module->if_mtu, module->rd_num, module->sd_num);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) {
goto chan_destroy;
}
module->local_addr.isn = get_initial_seq_no();
/* Place QP number in our local address information */
module->local_addr.qp_num[USNIC_PRIORITY_CHANNEL] =
module->mod_channels[USNIC_PRIORITY_CHANNEL].qp->qp_num;
module->local_addr.qp_num[USNIC_DATA_CHANNEL] =
module->mod_channels[USNIC_DATA_CHANNEL].qp->qp_num;
/* Get the fd to receive events on this device */
opal_event_set(opal_event_base, &(module->device_async_event),
module->device_context->async_fd,
OPAL_EV_READ | OPAL_EV_PERSIST,
module_async_event_callback, module);
opal_event_add(&(module->device_async_event), NULL);
module->device_async_event_active = true;
/* No more errors anticipated - initialize everything else */
/* list of all endpoints */
OBJ_CONSTRUCT(&(module->all_endpoints), opal_list_t);
/* Pending send segs list */
OBJ_CONSTRUCT(&module->pending_resend_segs, opal_list_t);
OBJ_CONSTRUCT(&module->endpoints_that_need_acks, opal_list_t);
/* list of endpoints that are ready to send */
OBJ_CONSTRUCT(&module->endpoints_with_sends, opal_list_t);
segsize = (module->if_mtu + opal_cache_line_size - 1) &
~(opal_cache_line_size - 1);
/* Send frags freelists */
OBJ_CONSTRUCT(&module->small_send_frags, ompi_free_list_t);
rc = ompi_free_list_init_new(&module->small_send_frags,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_small_send_frag_t),
opal_cache_line_size,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
OBJ_CLASS(opal_btl_usnic_small_send_frag_t),
segsize,
opal_cache_line_size,
module->sd_num * 4,
-1,
module->sd_num / 2,
module->super.btl_mpool);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
assert(OPAL_SUCCESS == rc);
OBJ_CONSTRUCT(&module->large_send_frags, ompi_free_list_t);
rc = ompi_free_list_init_new(&module->large_send_frags,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_large_send_frag_t),
opal_cache_line_size,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
OBJ_CLASS(opal_btl_usnic_large_send_frag_t),
0, /* payload size */
0, /* payload align */
module->sd_num / 8,
-1,
module->sd_num / 8,
NULL);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
assert(OPAL_SUCCESS == rc);
OBJ_CONSTRUCT(&module->put_dest_frags, ompi_free_list_t);
rc = ompi_free_list_init_new(&module->put_dest_frags,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_put_dest_frag_t),
opal_cache_line_size,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
OBJ_CLASS(opal_btl_usnic_put_dest_frag_t),
0, /* payload size */
0, /* payload align */
module->sd_num / 8,
-1,
module->sd_num / 8,
NULL);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
assert(OPAL_SUCCESS == rc);
/* list of segments to use for sending */
OBJ_CONSTRUCT(&module->chunk_segs, ompi_free_list_t);
rc = ompi_free_list_init_new(&module->chunk_segs,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_chunk_segment_t),
opal_cache_line_size,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
OBJ_CLASS(opal_btl_usnic_chunk_segment_t),
segsize,
opal_cache_line_size,
module->sd_num * 4,
-1,
module->sd_num / 2,
module->super.btl_mpool);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
assert(OPAL_SUCCESS == rc);
/* ACK segments freelist */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
ack_segment_len = (sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_btl_header_t) +
opal_cache_line_size - 1) & ~(opal_cache_line_size - 1);
OBJ_CONSTRUCT(&module->ack_segs, ompi_free_list_t);
rc = ompi_free_list_init_new(&module->ack_segs,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_ack_segment_t),
opal_cache_line_size,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
OBJ_CLASS(opal_btl_usnic_ack_segment_t),
ack_segment_len,
opal_cache_line_size,
module->sd_num * 4,
-1,
module->sd_num / 2,
module->super.btl_mpool);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
assert(OPAL_SUCCESS == rc);
/*
* Initialize pools of large recv buffers
*
* NOTE: (last_pool < first_pool) is _not_ erroneous; recv buffer pools
* simply won't be used in that case.
*/
module->first_pool = 16; /* 64 kiB */
module->last_pool = usnic_fls(module->super.btl_eager_limit-1);
module->module_recv_buffers = calloc(module->last_pool+1,
sizeof(ompi_free_list_t));
assert(module->module_recv_buffers != NULL);
for (i=module->first_pool; i<=module->last_pool; ++i) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
size_t elt_size = sizeof(opal_btl_usnic_rx_buf_t) - 1 + (1 << i);
OBJ_CONSTRUCT(&module->module_recv_buffers[i], ompi_free_list_t);
rc = ompi_free_list_init_new(&module->module_recv_buffers[i],
elt_size,
opal_cache_line_size,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
OBJ_CLASS(opal_btl_usnic_rx_buf_t),
0, /* payload size */
0, /* payload align */
128, /* init elts to alloc */
128, /* max elts to alloc */
128, /* num elts per alloc */
NULL /* mpool */);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
assert(OPAL_SUCCESS == rc);
}
Move all usNIC stats to _stats.c|h and export them as MPI_T pvars. This commit moves all the module stats into their own struct so that the stats only need to appear as a single line in the module_t definition, and then moves all the logic for reporting the stats into btl_usnic_stats.c|h. Further, the stats are now exported as MPI_T_BIND_NO_OBJECT entities (i.e., not bound to any particular MPI handle), and are marked as READONLY and CONTINUOUS. They currently all default to verbose level 5 ("Application tuner / detailed", according to https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/MCAParamLevels). Most of the statistics are counters, but a small number are high watermark values. Due to how counters are reported via MPI_T, none of the counters are exported through MPI_T if the MCA param btl_usnic_stats_relative=1 (i.e., the module resets the stats back to zero at a given frequency). When MPI_T_pvar_handle_alloc() is invoked on any of these pvars, it will return a count that is equal to the number of active usnic BTL modules. The values returned for any given pvar (e.g., num_total_sends) are an array containing one value for each active usnic BTL module. The ordering of values in the array is both consistent across all usnic pvars and stable throughout a single job: array slot 0 corresponds to module X, array slot 1 corresponds to module Y, etc. Mapping which array slot corresponds to which underlying Linux usnic_X device works as follows: * The btl_usnic_devices MPI_T state pvar is associated with a btl_usnic_device MPI_T enum, and be obtained via MPI_T_pvar_get_info(). * If all usNIC pvars are of length N, the values [0,N) in the btl_usnic_device enum are associated with strings of the corresponding underlying Linux device. For exampe, to look up which Linux device is reported in all usNIC pvars' array slot 1, look up the int value 1 in the btl_usnic_devices enum. Its corresponding string value is underlying Linux device name (e.g., "usnic_1"). cmr=v1.7.4:subject="usnic BTL MPI_T pvars" This commit was SVN r29545.
2013-10-29 02:23:08 +04:00
/* Initialize stats on this module */
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_stats_init(module);
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
chan_destroy:
for (i=0; i<USNIC_NUM_CHANNELS; ++i) {
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_channel_finalize(module, &module->mod_channels[i]);
}
mca_mpool_base_module_destroy(module->super.btl_mpool);
dealloc_pd:
rc = ibv_dealloc_pd(module->pd);
if (rc) {
BTL_ERROR(("failed to ibv_dealloc_pd, err=%d (%s)", rc, strerror(rc)));
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_ERROR;
}
static int usnic_ft_event(int state)
{
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
return OPAL_SUCCESS;
}
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
opal_btl_usnic_module_t opal_btl_usnic_module_template = {
.super = {
.btl_component = &mca_btl_usnic_component.super,
.btl_exclusivity = MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_DEFAULT,
.btl_flags = MCA_BTL_FLAGS_SEND |
MCA_BTL_FLAGS_PUT |
MCA_BTL_FLAGS_SEND_INPLACE,
George did the work and deserves all the credit for it. Ralph did the merge, and deserves whatever blame results from errors in it :-) WHAT: Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all necessary components (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL All the components required for inter-process communications are currently deeply integrated in the OMPI layer. Several groups/institutions have express interest in having a more generic communication infrastructure, without all the OMPI layer dependencies. This communication layer should be made available at a different software level, available to all layers in the Open MPI software stack. As an example, our ORTE layer could replace the current OOB and instead use the BTL directly, gaining access to more reactive network interfaces than TCP. Similarly, external software libraries could take advantage of our highly optimized AM (active message) communication layer for their own purpose. UTK with support from Sandia, developped a version of Open MPI where the entire communication infrastucture has been moved down to OPAL (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool). Most of the moved components have been updated to match the new schema, with few exceptions (mainly BTLs where I have no way of compiling/testing them). Thus, the completion of this RFC is tied to being able to completing this move for all BTLs. For this we need help from the rest of the Open MPI community, especially those supporting some of the BTLs. A non-exhaustive list of BTLs that qualify here is: mx, portals4, scif, udapl, ugni, usnic. This commit was SVN r32317.
2014-07-26 04:47:28 +04:00
#ifndef OPAL_BTL_USNIC_CISCO_V1_6
.btl_seg_size = sizeof(mca_btl_base_segment_t), /* seg size */
#endif
.btl_add_procs = usnic_add_procs,
.btl_del_procs = usnic_del_procs,
.btl_finalize = usnic_finalize,
.btl_alloc = usnic_alloc,
.btl_free = usnic_free,
.btl_prepare_src = usnic_prepare_src,
.btl_prepare_dst = usnic_prepare_dst,
.btl_send = usnic_send,
.btl_put = usnic_put,
.btl_dump = mca_btl_base_dump,
.btl_register_error = usnic_register_pml_err_cb,
.btl_ft_event = usnic_ft_event
}
};