1
1
openmpi/orte/mca/ess/base/ess_base_fns.c

314 строки
15 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/*
* Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Trustees of Indiana University and Indiana
* University Research and Technology
* Corporation. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2004-2011 The University of Tennessee and The University
* of Tennessee Research Foundation. All rights
* reserved.
2015-06-23 20:59:57 -07:00
* Copyright (c) 2004-2005 High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart,
* University of Stuttgart. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Regents of the University of California.
* All rights reserved.
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
* Copyright (c) 2011-2012 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2011-2012 Los Alamos National Security, LLC.
* All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2014-2015 Intel, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2014 Research Organization for Information Science
* and Technology (RIST). All rights reserved.
* $COPYRIGHT$
2015-06-23 20:59:57 -07:00
*
* Additional copyrights may follow
2015-06-23 20:59:57 -07:00
*
* $HEADER$
*/
#include "orte_config.h"
#include "orte/constants.h"
#ifdef HAVE_UNISTD_H
#include <unistd.h>
#endif
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include "opal/util/output.h"
#include "opal/mca/pmix/pmix.h"
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
#include "opal/mca/hwloc/base/base.h"
#include "orte/mca/errmgr/errmgr.h"
#include "orte/util/name_fns.h"
#include "orte/util/nidmap.h"
#include "orte/util/proc_info.h"
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
#include "orte/util/show_help.h"
#include "orte/runtime/orte_globals.h"
#include "orte/mca/ess/base/base.h"
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
int orte_ess_base_proc_binding(void)
{
hwloc_obj_t node, obj;
hwloc_cpuset_t cpus, nodeset;
hwloc_obj_type_t target;
unsigned int cache_level = 0;
struct hwloc_topology_support *support;
char *map;
int ret;
char *error=NULL;
hwloc_cpuset_t mycpus;
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
/* Determine if we were pre-bound or not */
if (NULL != getenv(OPAL_MCA_PREFIX"orte_bound_at_launch")) {
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
orte_proc_is_bound = true;
if (NULL != (map = getenv(OPAL_MCA_PREFIX"orte_base_applied_binding"))) {
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
orte_proc_applied_binding = hwloc_bitmap_alloc();
if (0 != (ret = hwloc_bitmap_list_sscanf(orte_proc_applied_binding, map))) {
error = "applied_binding parse";
goto error;
}
}
} else if (NULL != getenv(OPAL_MCA_PREFIX"orte_externally_bound")) {
orte_proc_is_bound = true;
/* the topology system will pickup the binding pattern */
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
}
/* see if we were bound when launched */
if (!orte_proc_is_bound) {
OPAL_OUTPUT_VERBOSE((5, orte_ess_base_framework.framework_output,
"%s Not bound at launch",
ORTE_NAME_PRINT(ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME)));
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
/* we were not bound at launch */
if (NULL == opal_hwloc_topology) {
/* there is nothing we can do, so just return */
return ORTE_SUCCESS;
}
support = (struct hwloc_topology_support*)hwloc_topology_get_support(opal_hwloc_topology);
/* get our node object */
node = hwloc_get_root_obj(opal_hwloc_topology);
nodeset = opal_hwloc_base_get_available_cpus(opal_hwloc_topology, node);
/* get our bindings */
cpus = hwloc_bitmap_alloc();
if (hwloc_get_cpubind(opal_hwloc_topology, cpus, HWLOC_CPUBIND_PROCESS) < 0) {
/* we are NOT bound if get_cpubind fails, nor can we be bound - the
* environment does not support it
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
*/
hwloc_bitmap_free(cpus);
OPAL_OUTPUT_VERBOSE((5, orte_ess_base_framework.framework_output,
"%s Binding not supported",
ORTE_NAME_PRINT(ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME)));
goto MOVEON;
}
/* we are bound if the two cpusets are not equal,
* or if there is only ONE cpu available to us
*/
if (0 != hwloc_bitmap_compare(cpus, nodeset) ||
opal_hwloc_base_single_cpu(nodeset) ||
opal_hwloc_base_single_cpu(cpus)) {
/* someone external set it - indicate it is set
* so that we know
*/
orte_proc_is_bound = true;
hwloc_bitmap_list_asprintf(&orte_process_info.cpuset, cpus);
hwloc_bitmap_free(cpus);
OPAL_OUTPUT_VERBOSE((5, orte_ess_base_framework.framework_output,
"%s Process was externally bound",
ORTE_NAME_PRINT(ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME)));
} else if (support->cpubind->set_thisproc_cpubind &&
OPAL_BINDING_POLICY_IS_SET(opal_hwloc_binding_policy) &&
OPAL_BIND_TO_NONE != OPAL_GET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy)) {
/* the system is capable of doing processor affinity, but it
* has not yet been set - see if a slot_list was given
*/
hwloc_bitmap_zero(cpus);
if (OPAL_BIND_TO_CPUSET == OPAL_GET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy)) {
if (OPAL_SUCCESS != (ret = opal_hwloc_base_slot_list_parse(opal_hwloc_base_slot_list,
opal_hwloc_topology,
OPAL_HWLOC_LOGICAL, cpus))) {
error = "Setting processor affinity failed";
hwloc_bitmap_free(cpus);
goto error;
}
if (0 > hwloc_set_cpubind(opal_hwloc_topology, cpus, 0)) {
error = "Setting processor affinity failed";
hwloc_bitmap_free(cpus);
goto error;
}
hwloc_bitmap_list_asprintf(&orte_process_info.cpuset, cpus);
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
hwloc_bitmap_free(cpus);
orte_proc_is_bound = true;
OPAL_OUTPUT_VERBOSE((5, orte_ess_base_framework.framework_output,
"%s Process bound according to slot_list",
ORTE_NAME_PRINT(ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME)));
} else {
/* cleanup */
hwloc_bitmap_free(cpus);
/* get the node rank */
if (ORTE_NODE_RANK_INVALID == orte_process_info.my_node_rank) {
/* this is not an error - could be due to being
* direct launched - so just ignore and leave
* us unbound
*/
OPAL_OUTPUT_VERBOSE((5, orte_ess_base_framework.framework_output,
"%s Process not bound - no node rank available",
ORTE_NAME_PRINT(ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME)));
goto MOVEON;
}
/* if the binding policy is hwthread, then we bind to the nrank-th
* hwthread on this node
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
*/
if (OPAL_BIND_TO_HWTHREAD == OPAL_GET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy)) {
if (NULL == (obj = opal_hwloc_base_get_obj_by_type(opal_hwloc_topology, HWLOC_OBJ_PU,
0, orte_process_info.my_node_rank, OPAL_HWLOC_LOGICAL))) {
ret = ORTE_ERR_NOT_FOUND;
error = "Getting hwthread object";
goto error;
}
cpus = opal_hwloc_base_get_available_cpus(opal_hwloc_topology, obj);
if (0 > hwloc_set_cpubind(opal_hwloc_topology, cpus, 0)) {
ret = ORTE_ERROR;
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
error = "Setting processor affinity failed";
goto error;
}
hwloc_bitmap_list_asprintf(&orte_process_info.cpuset, cpus);
hwloc_bitmap_free(cpus);
OPAL_OUTPUT_VERBOSE((5, orte_ess_base_framework.framework_output,
"%s Process bound to hwthread",
ORTE_NAME_PRINT(ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME)));
} else if (OPAL_BIND_TO_CORE == OPAL_GET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy)) {
/* if the binding policy is core, then we bind to the nrank-th
* core on this node
*/
if (NULL == (obj = opal_hwloc_base_get_obj_by_type(opal_hwloc_topology, HWLOC_OBJ_CORE,
0, orte_process_info.my_node_rank, OPAL_HWLOC_LOGICAL))) {
ret = ORTE_ERR_NOT_FOUND;
error = "Getting core object";
goto error;
}
cpus = opal_hwloc_base_get_available_cpus(opal_hwloc_topology, obj);
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
if (0 > hwloc_set_cpubind(opal_hwloc_topology, cpus, 0)) {
error = "Setting processor affinity failed";
ret = ORTE_ERROR;
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
goto error;
}
hwloc_bitmap_list_asprintf(&orte_process_info.cpuset, cpus);
OPAL_OUTPUT_VERBOSE((5, orte_ess_base_framework.framework_output,
"%s Process bound to core",
ORTE_NAME_PRINT(ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME)));
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
} else {
/* for all higher binding policies, we bind to the specified
* object that the nrank-th core belongs to
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
*/
if (NULL == (obj = opal_hwloc_base_get_obj_by_type(opal_hwloc_topology, HWLOC_OBJ_CORE,
0, orte_process_info.my_node_rank, OPAL_HWLOC_LOGICAL))) {
ret = ORTE_ERR_NOT_FOUND;
error = "Getting core object";
goto error;
}
if (OPAL_BIND_TO_L1CACHE == OPAL_GET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy)) {
target = HWLOC_OBJ_CACHE;
cache_level = 1;
} else if (OPAL_BIND_TO_L2CACHE == OPAL_GET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy)) {
target = HWLOC_OBJ_CACHE;
cache_level = 2;
} else if (OPAL_BIND_TO_L3CACHE == OPAL_GET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy)) {
target = HWLOC_OBJ_CACHE;
cache_level = 3;
} else if (OPAL_BIND_TO_SOCKET == OPAL_GET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy)) {
target = HWLOC_OBJ_SOCKET;
} else if (OPAL_BIND_TO_NUMA == OPAL_GET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy)) {
target = HWLOC_OBJ_NODE;
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
} else {
ret = ORTE_ERR_NOT_FOUND;
error = "Binding policy not known";
goto error;
}
for (obj = obj->parent; NULL != obj; obj = obj->parent) {
if (target == obj->type) {
if (HWLOC_OBJ_CACHE == target && cache_level != obj->attr->cache.depth) {
continue;
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
}
/* this is the place! */
cpus = opal_hwloc_base_get_available_cpus(opal_hwloc_topology, obj);
if (0 > hwloc_set_cpubind(opal_hwloc_topology, cpus, 0)) {
ret = ORTE_ERROR;
error = "Setting processor affinity failed";
goto error;
}
hwloc_bitmap_list_asprintf(&orte_process_info.cpuset, cpus);
orte_proc_is_bound = true;
OPAL_OUTPUT_VERBOSE((5, orte_ess_base_framework.framework_output,
"%s Process bound to %s",
ORTE_NAME_PRINT(ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME),
hwloc_obj_type_string(target)));
break;
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
}
}
if (!orte_proc_is_bound) {
ret = ORTE_ERROR;
error = "Setting processor affinity failed";
goto error;
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
}
}
}
}
} else {
OPAL_OUTPUT_VERBOSE((5, orte_ess_base_framework.framework_output,
"%s Process bound at launch",
ORTE_NAME_PRINT(ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME)));
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
}
MOVEON:
/* get or update our local cpuset - it will get used multiple
* times, so it's more efficient to keep a global copy
*/
opal_hwloc_base_get_local_cpuset();
/* get the cpus we are bound to */
mycpus = hwloc_bitmap_alloc();
2015-06-23 20:59:57 -07:00
if (hwloc_get_cpubind(opal_hwloc_topology,
mycpus,
HWLOC_CPUBIND_PROCESS) < 0) {
if (NULL != orte_process_info.cpuset) {
free(orte_process_info.cpuset);
orte_process_info.cpuset = NULL;
}
if (opal_hwloc_report_bindings || 4 < opal_output_get_verbosity(orte_ess_base_framework.framework_output)) {
opal_output(0, "MCW rank %d is not bound",
ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME->vpid);
}
} else {
/* store/update the string representation of our local binding */
if (NULL != orte_process_info.cpuset) {
free(orte_process_info.cpuset);
orte_process_info.cpuset = NULL;
}
hwloc_bitmap_list_asprintf(&orte_process_info.cpuset, mycpus);
/* report the binding, if requested */
if (opal_hwloc_report_bindings || 4 < opal_output_get_verbosity(orte_ess_base_framework.framework_output)) {
char tmp1[1024], tmp2[1024];
if (OPAL_ERR_NOT_BOUND == opal_hwloc_base_cset2str(tmp1, sizeof(tmp1), opal_hwloc_topology, mycpus)) {
opal_output(0, "MCW rank %d is not bound (or bound to all available processors)", ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME->vpid);
} else {
opal_hwloc_base_cset2mapstr(tmp2, sizeof(tmp2), opal_hwloc_topology, mycpus);
opal_output(0, "MCW rank %d bound to %s: %s",
ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME->vpid, tmp1, tmp2);
}
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
}
}
hwloc_bitmap_free(mycpus);
Per the PMIx RFC: WHAT: Merge the PMIx branch into the devel repo, creating a new OPAL “lmix” framework to abstract PMI support for all RTEs. Replace the ORTE daemon-level collectives with a new PMIx server and update the ORTE grpcomm framework to support server-to-server collectives WHY: We’ve had problems dealing with variations in PMI implementations, and need to extend the existing PMI definitions to meet exascale requirements. WHEN: Mon, Aug 25 WHERE: https://github.com/rhc54/ompi-svn-mirror.git Several community members have been working on a refactoring of the current PMI support within OMPI. Although the APIs are common, Slurm and Cray implement a different range of capabilities, and package them differently. For example, Cray provides an integrated PMI-1/2 library, while Slurm separates the two and requires the user to specify the one to be used at runtime. In addition, several bugs in the Slurm implementations have caused problems requiring extra coding. All this has led to a slew of #if’s in the PMI code and bugs when the corner-case logic for one implementation accidentally traps the other. Extending this support to other implementations would have increased this complexity to an unacceptable level. Accordingly, we have: * created a new OPAL “pmix” framework to abstract the PMI support, with separate components for Cray, Slurm PMI-1, and Slurm PMI-2 implementations. * Replaced the current ORTE grpcomm daemon-based collective operation with an integrated PMIx server, and updated the grpcomm APIs to provide more flexible, multi-algorithm support for collective operations. At this time, only the xcast and allgather operations are supported. * Replaced the current global collective id with a signature based on the names of the participating procs. The allows an unlimited number of collectives to be executed by any group of processes, subject to the requirement that only one collective can be active at a time for a unique combination of procs. Note that a proc can be involved in any number of simultaneous collectives - it is the specific combination of procs that is subject to the constraint * removed the prior OMPI/OPAL modex code * added new macros for executing modex send/recv to simplify use of the new APIs. The send macros allow the caller to specify whether or not the BTL supports async modex operations - if so, then the non-blocking “fence” operation is used, if the active PMIx component supports it. Otherwise, the default is a full blocking modex exchange as we currently perform. * retained the current flag that directs us to use a blocking fence operation, but only to retrieve data upon demand This commit was SVN r32570.
2014-08-21 18:56:47 +00:00
/* push our cpuset so others can calculate our locality */
if (NULL != orte_process_info.cpuset) {
OPAL_MODEX_SEND_VALUE(ret, OPAL_PMIX_GLOBAL, OPAL_PMIX_CPUSET,
orte_process_info.cpuset, OPAL_STRING);
}
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
return ORTE_SUCCESS;
error:
if (ORTE_ERR_SILENT != ret) {
Per the PMIx RFC: WHAT: Merge the PMIx branch into the devel repo, creating a new OPAL “lmix” framework to abstract PMI support for all RTEs. Replace the ORTE daemon-level collectives with a new PMIx server and update the ORTE grpcomm framework to support server-to-server collectives WHY: We’ve had problems dealing with variations in PMI implementations, and need to extend the existing PMI definitions to meet exascale requirements. WHEN: Mon, Aug 25 WHERE: https://github.com/rhc54/ompi-svn-mirror.git Several community members have been working on a refactoring of the current PMI support within OMPI. Although the APIs are common, Slurm and Cray implement a different range of capabilities, and package them differently. For example, Cray provides an integrated PMI-1/2 library, while Slurm separates the two and requires the user to specify the one to be used at runtime. In addition, several bugs in the Slurm implementations have caused problems requiring extra coding. All this has led to a slew of #if’s in the PMI code and bugs when the corner-case logic for one implementation accidentally traps the other. Extending this support to other implementations would have increased this complexity to an unacceptable level. Accordingly, we have: * created a new OPAL “pmix” framework to abstract the PMI support, with separate components for Cray, Slurm PMI-1, and Slurm PMI-2 implementations. * Replaced the current ORTE grpcomm daemon-based collective operation with an integrated PMIx server, and updated the grpcomm APIs to provide more flexible, multi-algorithm support for collective operations. At this time, only the xcast and allgather operations are supported. * Replaced the current global collective id with a signature based on the names of the participating procs. The allows an unlimited number of collectives to be executed by any group of processes, subject to the requirement that only one collective can be active at a time for a unique combination of procs. Note that a proc can be involved in any number of simultaneous collectives - it is the specific combination of procs that is subject to the constraint * removed the prior OMPI/OPAL modex code * added new macros for executing modex send/recv to simplify use of the new APIs. The send macros allow the caller to specify whether or not the BTL supports async modex operations - if so, then the non-blocking “fence” operation is used, if the active PMIx component supports it. Otherwise, the default is a full blocking modex exchange as we currently perform. * retained the current flag that directs us to use a blocking fence operation, but only to retrieve data upon demand This commit was SVN r32570.
2014-08-21 18:56:47 +00:00
orte_show_help("help-orte-runtime",
Per RFC, bring in the following changes: * Remove paffinity, maffinity, and carto frameworks -- they've been wholly replaced by hwloc. * Move ompi_mpi_init() affinity-setting/checking code down to ORTE. * Update sm, smcuda, wv, and openib components to no longer use carto. Instead, use hwloc data. There are still optimizations possible in the sm/smcuda BTLs (i.e., making multiple mpools). Also, the old carto-based code found out how many NUMA nodes were ''available'' -- not how many were used ''in this job''. The new hwloc-using code computes the same value -- it was not updated to calculate how many NUMA nodes are used ''by this job.'' * Note that I cannot compile the smcuda and wv BTLs -- I ''think'' they're right, but they need to be verified by their owners. * The openib component now does a bunch of stuff to figure out where "near" OpenFabrics devices are. '''THIS IS A CHANGE IN DEFAULT BEHAVIOR!!''' and still needs to be verified by OpenFabrics vendors (I do not have a NUMA machine with an OpenFabrics device that is a non-uniform distance from multiple different NUMA nodes). * Completely rewrite the OMPI_Affinity_str() routine from the "affinity" mpiext extension. This extension now understands hyperthreads; the output format of it has changed a bit to reflect this new information. * Bunches of minor changes around the code base to update names/types from maffinity/paffinity-based names to hwloc-based names. * Add some helper functions into the hwloc base, mainly having to do with the fact that we have the hwloc data reporting ''all'' topology information, but sometimes you really only want the (online | available) data. This commit was SVN r26391.
2012-05-07 14:52:54 +00:00
"orte_init:startup:internal-failure",
true, error, ORTE_ERROR_NAME(ret), ret);
}
return ORTE_ERR_SILENT;
}