1
1
openmpi/ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c

55 строки
1.4 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/*
* Copyright (c) 2013 Sandia National Laboratories. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2015 Research Organization for Information Science
* and Technology (RIST). All rights reserved.
fixes for Dave's get/set info code The expected sequence of events for processing info during object creation is that if there's an incoming info arg, it is opal_info_dup()ed into the obj at obj->s_info first. Then interested components register callbacks for keys they want to know about using opal_infosubscribe_infosubscribe(). Inside info_subscribe_subscribe() the specified callback() is called with whatever matching k/v is in the object's info, or with the default. The return string from the callback goes into the new k/v stored in info, and the input k/v is saved as __IN_<key>/<val>. It's saved the same way whether the input came from info or whether it was a default. A null return from the callback indicates an ignored key/val, and no k/v is stored for it, but an __IN_<key>/<val> is still kept so we still have access to the original. At MPI_*_set_info() time, opal_infosubscribe_change_info() is used. That function calls the registered callbacks for each item in the provided info. If the callback returns non-null, the info is updated with that k/v, or if the callback returns null, that key is deleted from info. An __IN_<key>/<val> is saved either way, and overwrites any previously saved value. When MPI_*_get_info() is called, opal_info_dup_mpistandard() is used, which allows relatively easy changes in interpretation of the standard, by looking at both the <key>/<val> and __IN_<key>/<val> in info. Right now it does 1. includes system extras, eg k/v defaults not expliclty set by the user 2. omits ignored keys 3. shows input values, not callback modifications, eg not the internal values Currently the callbacks are doing things like return some_condition ? "true" : "false" that is, returning static strings that are not to be freed. If the return strings start becoming more dynamic in the future I don't see how unallocated strings could support that, so I'd propose a change for the future that the callback()s registered with info_subscribe_subscribe() do a strdup on their return, and we change the callers of callback() to free the strings it returns (there are only two callers). Rough outline of the smaller changes spread over the less central files: comm.c initialize comm->super.s_info to NULL copy into comm->super.s_info in comm creation calls that provide info OBJ_RELEASE comm->super.s_info at free time comm_init.c initialize comm->super.s_info to NULL file.c copy into file->super.s_info if file creation provides info OBJ_RELEASE file->super.s_info at free time win.c copy into win->super.s_info if win creation provides info OBJ_RELEASE win->super.s_info at free time comm_get_info.c file_get_info.c win_get_info.c change_info() if there's no info attached (shouldn't happen if callbacks are registered) copy the info for the user The other category of change is generally addressing compiler warnings where ompi_info_t and opal_info_t were being used a little too interchangably. An ompi_info_t* contains an opal_info_t*, at &(ompi_info->super) Also this commit updates the copyrights. Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com>
2017-01-31 04:29:50 +03:00
* Copyright (c) 2016-2017 IBM Corporation. All rights reserved.
* $COPYRIGHT$
*
* Additional copyrights may follow
*
* $HEADER$
*/
#include "ompi_config.h"
#include "ompi/mpi/c/bindings.h"
#include "ompi/runtime/params.h"
#include "ompi/errhandler/errhandler.h"
#include "ompi/win/win.h"
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 20:02:01 +03:00
#include "ompi/communicator/communicator.h"
#include "opal/util/info_subscriber.h"
#if OMPI_BUILD_MPI_PROFILING
#if OPAL_HAVE_WEAK_SYMBOLS
#pragma weak MPI_Win_set_info = PMPI_Win_set_info
#endif
#define MPI_Win_set_info PMPI_Win_set_info
#endif
static const char FUNC_NAME[] = "MPI_Win_set_info";
int MPI_Win_set_info(MPI_Win win, MPI_Info info)
{
int ret;
if (MPI_PARAM_CHECK) {
OMPI_ERR_INIT_FINALIZE(FUNC_NAME);
if (ompi_win_invalid(win)) {
return OMPI_ERRHANDLER_INVOKE(MPI_COMM_WORLD, MPI_ERR_WIN, FUNC_NAME);
}
if (NULL == info || MPI_INFO_NULL == info ||
ompi_info_is_freed(info)) {
return OMPI_ERRHANDLER_INVOKE(win, MPI_ERR_INFO, FUNC_NAME);
}
}
OPAL_CR_ENTER_LIBRARY();
fixes for Dave's get/set info code The expected sequence of events for processing info during object creation is that if there's an incoming info arg, it is opal_info_dup()ed into the obj at obj->s_info first. Then interested components register callbacks for keys they want to know about using opal_infosubscribe_infosubscribe(). Inside info_subscribe_subscribe() the specified callback() is called with whatever matching k/v is in the object's info, or with the default. The return string from the callback goes into the new k/v stored in info, and the input k/v is saved as __IN_<key>/<val>. It's saved the same way whether the input came from info or whether it was a default. A null return from the callback indicates an ignored key/val, and no k/v is stored for it, but an __IN_<key>/<val> is still kept so we still have access to the original. At MPI_*_set_info() time, opal_infosubscribe_change_info() is used. That function calls the registered callbacks for each item in the provided info. If the callback returns non-null, the info is updated with that k/v, or if the callback returns null, that key is deleted from info. An __IN_<key>/<val> is saved either way, and overwrites any previously saved value. When MPI_*_get_info() is called, opal_info_dup_mpistandard() is used, which allows relatively easy changes in interpretation of the standard, by looking at both the <key>/<val> and __IN_<key>/<val> in info. Right now it does 1. includes system extras, eg k/v defaults not expliclty set by the user 2. omits ignored keys 3. shows input values, not callback modifications, eg not the internal values Currently the callbacks are doing things like return some_condition ? "true" : "false" that is, returning static strings that are not to be freed. If the return strings start becoming more dynamic in the future I don't see how unallocated strings could support that, so I'd propose a change for the future that the callback()s registered with info_subscribe_subscribe() do a strdup on their return, and we change the callers of callback() to free the strings it returns (there are only two callers). Rough outline of the smaller changes spread over the less central files: comm.c initialize comm->super.s_info to NULL copy into comm->super.s_info in comm creation calls that provide info OBJ_RELEASE comm->super.s_info at free time comm_init.c initialize comm->super.s_info to NULL file.c copy into file->super.s_info if file creation provides info OBJ_RELEASE file->super.s_info at free time win.c copy into win->super.s_info if win creation provides info OBJ_RELEASE win->super.s_info at free time comm_get_info.c file_get_info.c win_get_info.c change_info() if there's no info attached (shouldn't happen if callbacks are registered) copy the info for the user The other category of change is generally addressing compiler warnings where ompi_info_t and opal_info_t were being used a little too interchangably. An ompi_info_t* contains an opal_info_t*, at &(ompi_info->super) Also this commit updates the copyrights. Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com>
2017-01-31 04:29:50 +03:00
ret = opal_infosubscribe_change_info(&(win->super), &(info->super));
Major structural changes to data types: .super infosubscriber ompi_communicator_t, ompi_win_t, ompi_file_t all have a super class of type opal_infosubscriber_t instead of a base/super type of opal_object_t (in previous code comm used c_base, but file used super). It may be a bit bold to say that being a subscriber of MPI_Info is the foundational piece that ties these three things together, but if you object, then I would prefer to turn infosubscriber into a more general name that encompasses other common features rather than create a different super class. The key here is that we want to be able to pass comm, win and file objects as if they were opal_infosubscriber_t, so that one routine can heandle all 3 types of objects being passed to it. MPI_INFO_NULL is still an ompi_predefined_info_t type since an MPI_Info is part of ompi but the internal details of the underlying information concept is part of opal. An ompi_info_t type still exists for exposure to the user, but it is simply a wrapper for the opal object. Routines such as ompi_info_dup, etc have all been moved to opal_info_dup and related to the opal directory. Fortran to C translation tables are only used for MPI_Info that is exposed to the application and are therefore part of the ompi_info_t and not the opal_info_t The data structure changes are primarily in the following files: communicator/communicator.h ompi/info/info.h ompi/win/win.h ompi/file/file.h The following new files were created: opal/util/info.h opal/util/info.c opal/util/info_subscriber.h opal/util/info_subscriber.c This infosubscriber concept is that communicators, files and windows can have subscribers that subscribe to any changes in the info associated with the comm/file/window. When xxx_set_info is called, the new info is presented to each subscriber who can modify the info in any way they want. The new value is presented to the next subscriber and so on until all subscribers have had a chance to modify the value. Therefore, the order of subscribers can make a difference but we hope that there is generally only one subscriber that cares or modifies any given key/value pair. The final info is then stored and returned by a call to xxx_get_info. The new model can be seen in the following files: ompi/mpi/c/comm_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/comm_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/file_set_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_get_info.c ompi/mpi/c/win_set_info.c The current subscribers where changed as follows: mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_module.c mca/osc/rmda/osc_rdma_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "no_locks") mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c (This one actually subscribes to "blocking_fence" and "alloc_shared_contig") Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <markalle@us.ibm.com> Conflicts: AUTHORS ompi/communicator/comm.c ompi/debuggers/ompi_mpihandles_dll.c ompi/file/file.c ompi/file/file.h ompi/info/info.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio.h ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_open.c ompi/mca/io/ompio/io_ompio_file_set_view.c ompi/mca/osc/pt2pt/osc_pt2pt.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc.h ompi/mca/sharedfp/addproc/sharedfp_addproc_file_open.c ompi/mca/topo/treematch/topo_treematch_dist_graph_create.c ompi/mpi/c/lookup_name.c ompi/mpi/c/publish_name.c ompi/mpi/c/unpublish_name.c opal/mca/mpool/base/mpool_base_alloc.c opal/util/Makefile.am
2016-01-22 20:02:01 +03:00
OMPI_ERRHANDLER_RETURN(ret, win, ret, FUNC_NAME);
}